“marginally significant”

The differences in Y variants between these samples were marginally significant ( p = 0.06) (Additional File 1 ).

Moreover, increasing age was a marginally significant predictive factor of OS ( P = 0.06).

After adjustment for the number of live births, the difference between the two ethnic groups (Slavs vs Tartars and Bashkirs) was marginally significant ( P =0.06) suggesting that this is largely because of different reproductive patterns ( Remennick, 1989 ).

The interaction of the two factors was marginally significant for the latency of N2 component [ F (4,76) = 2.729, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.126].

The discrepancy between the direct and indirect estimate was marginally significant (I 2 =71%, P=0.06).

They also found – although marginally significant - decreased ERN (p = 0.06) in BDs when compared with controls, indicating that the electrophysiological alterations observed in the previous study probably are common markers of BD and not gender specific.

6A ) and running exerted a marginally significant inhibitory effect ( P = 0.06 for main effect of running), but there was no significant interaction effect ( P = 0.86).

There was also a marginally significant interaction effect between negative body image and weight status ( β = 0.67, p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).

Additionally, the frequencies of group 2 cells (CD137+ IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells) were higher in cluster 3 (G) tissues compared to cluster 2 (M) tissues (marginally significant, p = 0.06).

We observed a significant increase in the estimates of evolving HOMA-IR with increasing levels of oxLDL ( P < 0.001) and a marginally significant association with F 2 Isop ( P = 0.06).

Variance responses There was a marginally significant difference in variance changes between birds and insects, estimate = − 0.11, p = 0.06, 95% CI (− 0.22, 0.01), with birds showing a significant increase in variance following an immune challenge, estimate = 0.12, p = 0.02, 95% CI (0.02, 0.21), while insects did not, estimate = 0.01, p = 0.75, 95% CI (− 0.04, 0.06).

AR 2 and AR 3 populations show a marginally significant deviation from expectation of neutrality ( p < 0.06 for AR 2 ; p < 0.07 for AR 3 ).

RQ2: Changes in Participants’ Sedentary Behavior Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed a marginally significant decrease in daily sedentary time in group A ( Z =−11.50; P =.06) and no significant difference in daily sedentary time in group B ( Z =2.50; P =.59).

We also find a marginally significant correlation between the value of epistasis, ε , and the cost of the mutations (Pearson's correlation r = 0.19, P = 0.06).

These difference was significant ( p = 0.008) or marginally significant ( p = 0.06) in the experiment 2, which meant the interference of inter-character spaces and non-word spaces was appeared on the familiar format.

Due to the low number of cases, group differences were marginally significant in 2004 (χ 2 (2) = 3.53; p = 0.06) and were significant in 2018 (χ 2 (2) = 8.44; p<0.01).

In women, child birth and caesarean section were associated with increased risk of HCV infection, although the association was marginally significant for delivery (p = 0.06).

The results showed that there was a marginally significant interaction between regulatory focus and emotion in regard to the behavior of water-saving information dissemination ( F (1,56) = 3.62, p = 0.06)).

Being “not at all” anxious was a marginally significant predictor of weight loss (B = 0.83, p = 0.06).

In this model, citizenship of the parents was marginally significant (β = −0.108, p = 0.06, 95% CI: −0.226–0.009).

In fact, symbiotic performance was poor overall, with only strain ACRS20 having significantly higher shoot dry weight than the negative control (Dunnett’s test, p < 0.05) and performance of ACRS4b and ACRS7b being marginally significant ( p < 0.06).

Differences between families with 1 child with a disability and 3 or more children with a disability (mean, −1.1 ± 1.1; median, −1.2) were marginally significant (Dunn statistic = 1.86, P = .06).

For well-being indicators, emotion regulation fell to non-significance for positive and negative feelings and remained marginally significant for thriving ( p = .06), suggesting personality plays a more prominent role in eudemonic and emotional well-being compared to emotion regulation.

Condition was a marginally significant trend, B = 0.78, SE = 0.41, Wald χ 2 (1) = 3.72, p = 0.06.

There was, however, a marginally significant ( p = 0.06) effect of boredom proneness on risky behavior, such that risky behavior was reduced with increasing levels of boredom proneness (i.e., the opposite effect relative to literature on boredom proneness and self-reported risk-taking) (Table 8 ).