“marginally significant”

Similar to maternal influences, paternal behavioral control also served as a negative predictor of adolescent Internet addiction ( β = −0.20, p < 0.001, Cohen's f 2 = 0.04), while paternal psychological control showed a marginally significant positive prediction ( β = 0.04, p = 0.06, Cohen's f 2 = 0.002, see Table 2 ).

α- and β-Diversity in Each Obesity Phenotype Healthy individuals had higher microbial α-diversity based on the Shannon index compared to the MHO and MUO phenotypes, and the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 ).

To assess HI effects independent of temperature modulation, a 4 (Area) × 2 (Sex) × 2 (Treatment; HI normothermic and sham) repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant Sex × Treatment interaction [ F (1,37) = 5.621, p < 0.05], as well as a marginally significant Sex effect [ F (1,37) = 3.748, p = 0.06] and Area × Sex interaction [ F (1,37) = 2.996, p = 0.09].

The interaction between group and rating type may be more pronounced among conservative participants; the three-way interaction involving political ideology, rating type, and group was marginally significant ( B = −.41, SE = 0.22, p = .06).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between age (6, 12 months) and stimulus (face, object); F (1,47) = 3.71, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.073) such that there were longer peak looks to faces than objects at 6 months but not 12 months (6 months face M 20.46, SE 2.92; object M 14.87, SE 1.78; 12 months face M 14.23, SE 1.41; object M 14.77, SE = 1.04).

For psychosocial determinants of FVC, a statistically significant interaction effect was found on intention ( P <.001) and planning ( P <.001), whereas the time×group effect was marginally significant for self-efficacy ( P =.06) and nonsignificant for social support ( P =.83).

Overall alkaloid concentration was also higher in bee Salvia as detected by a t ‐test, indicating that concentration as well as composition contribute to this pattern ( t = 3.23, df = 5.01, P = 0.023), and marginally significant when considering all species ( t = 2.15, df = 10.14, P = 0.06).

Results demonstrated that there was no significant difference between conditions in perceived efficacy [F(1,148) = .12, p = .73] and a marginally significant difference between the groups in perceived threat [F(1,148) = 3.65, p = .06].

sanctipalustris ( p = 0.060, marginally significant), N. tunga (0.002), and N. vrijeuni ( p = 0.003) in terms of the dominant frequency ( Figs. 5 and 6 , Table S9 ).

Quantitatively, the risky drinking group showed a marginally significant decrease in the maximum (t 53 = 2.09, p = 0.06) and average (t 53 = 1.81, p = 0.08) number of drinks per week (Year 2 − baseline) compared with the moderate drinking group over the 2 years ( Table 1 ).

Total calendar years of yoga practice was marginally significant, P = 0.06.

before exposure to NWIs) – decreased willingness to donate in three of the seven scenarios – xenotransplant, stem cells, and evolution – and was marginally significant ( p = .06) in the bioweapons scenario.

The difference between treatment groups was marginally significant (estimate ± SE = 10.4 ± 5.2, t = 2.0, p = 0.06).

In the higher fit group, a group × time interaction was observed at the 1st, F (1, 23) = 12.10, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.35, 2nd, F (1, 23) = 5.94, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.21, and 3rd PI, F (1, 23) = 5.32, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.19), due to a longer IT at post-test than at pre-test in the control group [1st PI, F (1, 10) = 12.94, p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.56; 2nd PI, F (1, 10) = 5.97, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.37, and marginally significant at the 3rd PI; F (1, 10) = 4.43, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.31].

When comparing participants who had follow-up data to those who did not, baseline REAL-DQ scores on three subscales demonstrated marginally significant differences (Healthy Habits, p = .06; Managing Diabetes, p = .04; Emotions and Well-being, p = .06) with participants who scored higher at baseline being less likely to complete follow-up measures.

Flavanones showed a marginally significant trend ( p for trend =0.05), with the highest intake quartile approaching statistical significance (OR = 0 .74, 95% CI: 0.55–1.01, p = 0.06).

There was some evidence that grazer utilization may increase the percentage bare ground in tufted attractor‐dominated sites: the best model included only a positive and marginally significant effect of dung abundance on percentage bare ground ( F 1,13 = 4.312, p = .06; Figure 5 ; Table S7 ); however, the simpler intercept only model received similar support (ΔAICc = 1.115). 4.

The difference between the two measurements was marginally significant with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, Z = − 1.87, p = 0.06.

There was a marginally significant effect on egoistic motives (b = 0.23, SE = 0.12, p = 0.06).

Results : A marginally significant interaction effect emerged (β = −.71, p < .06).

Post hoc analysis on the ANOVA model revealed that contact versus noncontact decoding was significantly stronger in PN compared with both VTC and V1 (primary visual cortex) ( P = 0.005 and 0.004, respectively) and marginally significant compared with LOC ( P = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant effect of memory type ( F (1,36) = 3.79, P = 0.060), where lure discrimination was worse over time compared to target recognition.

The Shannon Diversity Index of landcover types within a 500-m buffer had a marginally significant positive effect on the number S. lineatus captured in pitfall traps at field pea sites (χ2 = 3.56, df = 1, P = 0.06, estimate = 1.47 ± 0.78) ( Supplementary Fig.

The EQ-VAS score also showed a positive but marginally significant association (coefficient = 4.095, p = 0.060).

The coefficient for Treatment was positive and marginally significant ( β = 1.05, SE = 0.56, Z = 1.88, p = 0.060), replicating the pattern in the 1-on-1 game, though the effect was weaker at the pair level.