“marginally significant”

No OBA effect was detected for the high-validity group, M diff = 0.02, t (16) = 0.99, p = 0.34, d = 0.14, BF 10 = 0.28, while a medium-sized OBA effect in the low-validity group was marginally significant, M diff = 0.03, t (18) = 2.02, p = 0.06, d = 0.44, BF 10 = 1.13.

Action planning was found to be a marginally significant negative predictor of snack consumption (β = -0.10; B = -0.27; p = 0.06), suggesting that higher scores on plans to restrict snack consumption lead to lower snack consumption.

Also, after removing the thirteen TG+ subjects (three of whom developed T1D) from the T1D analysis, the association between ovalbumin antibody concentrations and T1D development became marginally significant (p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ) .

A significant main effect of time, F (1,54) = 5.84, p = .02, partial η 2 = .10, was revealed for compassionate feelings that was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between time and training, F (1,54) = 3.61, p = .06, partial η 2 = .06.

Although a significant increase in the ‘G’ allele ( χ 2 =6.83, P = 0.00895, Power = 85.03%, OR = 2.6) was noticed in ALL patients, it was found to be marginally significant after correction for multiple testing (BH P = 0.06).

Of interest was a marginally significant decrease in liver metastases for patients receiving preoperative combined treatment (p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant effect of irradiation × treatment interaction on immobility (F (1,22) = 3.81, P = 0.06).

This was qualified by a marginally significant interaction, F (3,292) = 2.39, p = .06, η p 2 = .03, Huynh-Feldt corrected ( Figure 4 ).

The social network without dependent infants ( N = 16) remained marginally significant (mean pathlength to the nearest case: 0.048, p = 0.060).

There was a marginally significant negative effect on the level of entomophily ( p ‐value = .06 with buffer 500 m).

Notably, the improvement in the NDI was marginally significant ( P =.06), whereas the improvements in the ISI and PCL-5 were not statistically significant ( P =.26 and P =.37, respectively; Table 3 ).

Agreeableness showed marginally significant results (b = 2.39, p = 0.06).

In addition, a marginally significant increase in larval densities in AM fungi-inoculated plots was observed in RWW-C2 ( F 1,18 = 3.85, P = 0.06).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between these three factors ( F 1, 56 = 3.98, p <.06).

Additionally, a marginally significant effect of exposure day on carbohydrate content was noted ( p = 0.06).

The difference between the correlation coefficients was marginally significant ( z = 1.49, p = 0.06). 4.3.

There was also a marginally significant 3-way interaction of target configuration, congruency, and experiment, F (1,34) = 3.74, MS e = 187, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.10, showing a smaller difference in the congruency effects between the horizontal and vertical target configuration trials in the present experiment (a difference of 9 ms) compared with Experiment 4 in Chen and Cave (a difference of 27 ms).

With the addition of BMI, Step 2 was marginally significant, ΔR 2 = 0.04, F(2, 82) = 11.88, p ≤ 0.06, such that greater BMI was associated with greater SDRT, with BMI accounting for a marginal incremental amount of variance in incongruent RT variability beyond the associated descriptive variables, β = 0.19, t (82) = 1.93, p = 0.006.

An ANOVA did not find a significant effect of year on larval length for skipjack tuna larvae (p = 0.22), and there was a marginally significant effect for Thunnus spp. larvae (p = 0.06).

Authoritative parenting practice showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.06) by adolescent sex, with a higher authoritative score among parents of boys.

However, despite the lack of a reference plane in depth, for all but Subject 1 (marginally significant) the observed SEM values for phosphene area were significantly smaller than SEM values from randomly chosen electrodes (Subject 1: p < 0.06, Subject 2: p < 0.01, Subject 3: p < 0.001, Subject 4: p < 0.001).

In addition, gene SIK3 (ARIC p = 2.85×10 -23 ) was marginally significant in FHS (p = 6.01×10 -2 ), and reached genome-wide significance in the combined analysis (p < 1×10 -8 ).

Sample size had a significant effect on effect size ( p = 0.0394) and age had a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.0603).

Additionally, a 3-factor ANOVA shows a marginally significant interaction between experimental condition and portion of block in the frontal neural response ( F (1, 176) = 3.57, p = 0.0604; permutation based TypeIIISS(1, 176) = 129.4, p = 0.07705).

Differences in cell viability, with respect to control, between TMD and OD were marginally significant (F(7,48) = 2.11, p = 0.0605).