“marginally significant”

The goodness of fit test returned a significant result for coral restoration experience ( p = 0.01616) and a marginally significant result for participants’ number of dives in the Bay Islands ( p = 0.06052).

The time spent in closed arms was also higher in lactating females than in nonlactating females ( p = 0.0316), which may be partially dependent on strain, especially the CAJcl substrain, as indicated by a marginally significant strain × reproductive state interaction ( F 6,154 = 2.06, p = 0.0607).

InterSC showed a positive association with cognitive reappraisal (β = .21, p< .001), the need to belong (β = .25, p< .001), and API (β = .154, p< .001), but was negatively related to attentional control (β = -.10, p < .05), and a marginally significant association with self-esteem (β = -.068, p = .061).

For the first-order disparity training group, the first-order disparity threshold improvement was significantly greater than that in the zero-order disparity [ F (1, 9) = 8.650, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.490] and marginally significant than that in the second-order training [ F (1, 9) = 4.597, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.338].

For the main effect of treatment, a marginally significant result was found in the mPFC ( F [1, 48] = 3.68, p = .061), but not in the bilateral NAcc ( F s[1, 48] < 1, p s > .3).

A marginally significant association was also demonstrated between advanced N classification (either N 2 or N 3) and DSS (OR – 2.46, p = 0.061, 95% CI 0.96–6.33).

Regarding the benefits of PEB, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between pro-environmental attitude and type of estimation ( b = −0.02 CI 95% [−0.03, 0.00], p = 0.061; model statistics: F (2819) = 3.13, p = 0.025).

While there was no significant effect of age ( β = −0.070, p = 0.624), there was a marginally significant age × culture interaction ( β = −0.270, p = 0.061), indicating that developmental changes in context sensitivity differed across cultural contexts.

In multivariate model 1 comprising sociodemographic factors, the association between composite SES score and T2DM was marginally significant (type 3 p=0.061).

Liver fat content was significantly increased with length of exposure to HAFPD alone ( P = 0.003, compare 8WVeh and 16WVeh), but the difference in liver fat between 8W-matched and 16W-matched chow-fed mice was marginally significant (14.0 ± 6.1 and 26.0 ± 5.1%, respectively, P = 0.061).

The main effect of word type was marginally significant, F (1, 34) = 3.75, p = .061, η p 2 = .01, BF 10 = 0.66, indicating a trend toward faster responses to control relative to test words overall.

Furthermore, central to our hypothesis, a marginally significant Load × Group interaction effect was found, F (2, 27) = 3.1, p = 0.061 (see Figure 3 ).

In the model for FIM total score, diagnosis type was a statistically significant predictor ( P = 0.003; Table 4 ), while the number of AT was marginally significant ( P = 0.061; Table 4 ).

3b ) and marginally significant difference in the 5th rank subject (χ 2 = 5.60, p = 0.061; Fig. 3b ).

The intercept term of the model was marginally significant ( p = 0.061).

However, having higher percent of population aged more than 60 years was associated with higher case fatality rates (marginally significant P = 0.061), Table 1 . 3.2.2.

For non-lead-exposed respondents, blood lead levels in male ALAD2 allele carriers demonstrated a marginally significant decrease compared with those in male ALAD1 homozygotes ( p = 0.061).

Variation in dissatisfaction rate by household financial status was marginally significant ( P = 0.061) while that by current age ( P = 0.802), gender ( P = 0.570), ethnicity ( P = 0.110), daily per capita income of the household ( P = 0.890), time since surgery ( P = 0.838), and IOL surgery ( P = 0.632) were not significant.

Importantly, we found a marginally significant interaction for simulation versus priming with the warm versus cold pictures, F (1, 238) = 3.549, p = .061, η 2 = .015.

Notably, “p53 signaling pathway” and “Bile secretion” were also enriched with marginally significant p values ( p value = 0.061 and 0.065, respectively).

At T3, there was a marginally significant mean-level difference between the SNI and active control condition on SSB consumption, adjusted for baseline SSB consumption ( b = 0·17, se = 0·10, β = 0·20, P = 0·061, 95 % CI [–0·01, 0·40]).

The protective effect of preeclampsia against moderate-to-severe BPD was significant only in infants born at 29–31 weeks (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24–0.88) and not in those born before 29 weeks (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43–1.65), with a marginally significant interaction term ( p = 0.061).

The interaction effect was marginally significant, F (1,33) = 3.76, p = 0.061.

After applying propensity score weights, this association was reduced and became marginally significant (p = 0.061).

Considering only gender, without considering the group or experimental condition, women had lower SAP ( p < 0.001), increased HR ( p = 0.004), increased vasomotor domain score ( p = 0.034) and a marginally significant increase in secretomotor domain score ( p = 0.061) in the COMPASS-31, compared with men ( Table 5 ).