“marginally significant”

With Bonferroni adjustment for 15 comparisons ( Figure 1 ), leg-minus-forearm differences were marginally significant ( P =0.03–0.06).

Moreover, the relationship between carotenoid chroma and brightness was marginally significant and negative ( r = −.14; p = .030; n = 234; Figure 1c ). 3.2.

For Q 10dB values derived from middle-turn measurements obtained with stimulus levels of 50–70 dB SPL, a repeated-measures ANOVA (with stimulus level and measurement type as within-subjects factors) revealed no significant main effect of measurement type ( F (1,5) = 0.11, P = 0.75), a significant main effect of stimulus level ( F (2,10) = 50.35, P < 0.001), and a marginally significant interaction between stimulus level and measurement type ( F (2,10) = 4.88, P = 0.03).

Planned comparisons further showed that monosyllables with large rises in sonority (e.g., blif ) produced reliably more accurate responses relative to small rises (e.g., bnif , t1(39) = 8.68, p<.0001; t2(45) = 3.25, p<.003), which, in turn produced reliably more accurate responses compared to sonority plateaus (e.g., bdif , t1(39) = 7.14, p<.0001; t2(45) = 5.27, p<.0001); the contrast between sonority plateaus and falls (e.g., lbif ) was marginally significant (t1(39) = 2.37, p<.03; t2(45) = 1.13, p<.28) To demonstrate that the effect of syllable type is not due to artifact associated with binary data [31] , we also submitted the results to a General Mixed Effects Model logistic regression model with syllable (monosyllables vs. disyllables) and type (e.g., blif, bnif, bdif, lbif ) as fixed effects, and participants and items as random effects.

The difference was marginally significant for the angry face ( t (118) = 2.20, p = 0.030, Cohen’s d = 0.40, 95% CI [0.003, 0.07], uncorrected) and nonsignificant for the fearful face ( t (118) = 1.73, p = 0.087, Cohen’s d = 0.32, 95% CI [–0.004, 0.06], uncorrected).

Selection of treatment strategy on the basis of 18 F-FDG PET/CT alone was significantly associated with the survival outcomes at nine months (P=0.03) and marginally significant at 12 months (P=0.03).

The chi-square value of the goodness of fit test was marginally significant (p = 0.03) owing to a lack of observations between 5 and 10 m, but was not deemed sufficient to prevent using the model for inference.

Plasma Lp-PLA 2 activity did not correlate with CSF biomarkers nor with white matter changes within diagnoses, apart from a marginally significant inverse association with CSF Aβ42 in aMCI (r = -0.29, P = 0.03) (Table 3 ).

Similarly, the mean triglyceride level was lower in the cases (121.86 ± 59.20 mg/dL) than in the controls (138.53 ± 48.20 mg/dL), with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.03).

The interactions between the two FT2 homeologs were not significant in three experiments and marginally significant ( P= 0.03) in the LD chamber experiment ( Fig. 2B , C).

Low levels of phosphorylated alpha synuclein were detected in brain tissue fractions enriched for Lewy body pathology and were marginally significant between PD cases and controls (p = 0.03). status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2014 Apr 28; Accepted 2014 Jul 3; Collection date 2014.

Note, however, that even for these relatively uninformative studies the evidence favors \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mathcal {H}_{0}$\end{document} H 0 , whereas the respective classical p values equal p = .06 (i.e., “marginally significant”), p = .03 (i.e., “significant, reject \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mathcal {H}_{0}$\end{document} H 0 ”), and p = .06 (i.e., “marginally significant”). 3 Finally, consider the evidence for the studies in which the effect is in the opposite direction and most of the posterior mass is concentrated on negative values of ρ .

However, some differences at individual time points were indicated between males and females, such as in the first 3 months marginally significant differences in WAZ between the sexes were found, with slightly lower values in males ( p = 0.03).

In contrast, StromalScore demonstrated weaker yet marginally significant correlations across datasets ( p value ≈ 0.03–0.09), indicating that high-TIL-80 score tumors exhibit both increased immune infiltration and modest stromal enrichment.

Adjusting for plex number revealed that the serum phosphorylated peptide insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2)‐S142 within NDM strata showed marginally significant expression in AD ( β = 0.59, p = 0.03, FDR = 0.096).

A marginally significant recall direction by domain interaction was identified ( F (1,36) = 4.99; p = .03; η 2 = .12), with spatial backward spans significantly longer than verbal backward spans while no significant differences between spatial and verbal forward spans was identified.

Nonetheless, when only age was included as covariate, there was a marginally significant effect of MMR status ( P = .03).

Marginally significant allele-level associations for HLA-B ⁣ ∗ 18:01:01 (OR = 5.06, p =0.03) and -B ⁣ ∗ 58:02:01 (OR = 0.22, p =0.04) alleles did not withstand correction for multiple comparisons.

Inspection of the standardised β-values indicated that the contrast between the Best-Practice interview and the RI interview was marginally significant ( p = .03): children in the RI condition tended to recall fewer setting details (although note that numbers of setting details recalled were small across all interview conditions).

In women, the three polymorphisms showed a marginally significant association with fractures in the unadjusted analysis (rs1801132, p = 0.03; rs3020314, p = 0.04; rs1884051, p = 0.03), but it was no longer significant (p > 0.2) after including age as a covariate.

Again, we did not find significant differences between groups (CL/SC) except for number of awakenings which was marginally significant ( P = .03) but nonsignificant after correcting for multiple testing.

Weekly consumption of 1–7 units of wine was associated with a marginally significant smaller decline, while consumption of 8–14 units of wine was associated with a decline that was 1.5 IQ points lower ( p = 0.030) than no consumption of wine.

There was a marginally significant positive correlation between (C) HLA-B population promiscuity level and intracellular pathogen diversity (Spearman’s rho: 0.34, P = 0.03) and (D) no significant correlation between extracellular pathogen diversity and HLA-B population promiscuity level (Spearman’s rho: 0.25, P = 0.12).

Only the African sample showed marginally significant F ST higher than zero (0.08, p=0.03, not significant after Bonferroni correction), while other populations all had slightly negative estimates pointing to the limited role of the TYR locus in genetic differentiation within studied (sub-) continental groups ( Table S5 ) [ 74 ].

While the main effect of distractor frequency on sensitivity estimates was marginally significant [ F (1,185) = 5.3, p = 0.03], the main effect of distractor intensity and the intensity × frequency interaction failed to achieve statistical significance ( p values >0.05).