“marginally significant”

Moreover, the relationship between carotenoid chroma and brightness was marginally significant and negative ( r = −.14; p = .030; n = 234; Figure 1c ). 3.2.

Regarding ear size, only one gene, EDARADD , shows a marginally significant association when grouping all species together (uncorrected P -value = 0.03, slope = 1.181) ( Table 4 ), which might suggest the evolution of this gene is involved in variation in ear size across mammals, similar to the effects of EDAR in humans ( Adhikari et al. 2015 ).

Functional indicators The meta-analysis of functional outcomes (16 studies, n = 713) showed a marginally significant improvement favoring the IASTM group, with a moderate effect size [SMD = − 0.48, 95% CI (− 0.93, − 0.04), P = 0.03) (Fig. 4 ).

Multiple perpetrators for a sexual assault incident The first-order autocorrelation was marginally significant (p = 0.03) and insignificant for two or more lags.

21 A saturating concentration of Gly (1 mM) delivered to the MPTA yielded short, marginally significant bonus-times (4.3 ± 3.1 minutes, 8 trials in 4 rats, t[10] = 2.6, P = 0.03), albeit with 2 of 4 rats passing the 3SDs criterion (Fig. 5 B).

Only the African sample showed marginally significant F ST higher than zero (0.08, p=0.03, not significant after Bonferroni correction), while other populations all had slightly negative estimates pointing to the limited role of the TYR locus in genetic differentiation within studied (sub-) continental groups ( Table S5 ) [ 74 ].

For major coronary events in the primary prevention trials, the 11 separate tests for trend or heterogeneity of effect yielded only one, between men and women, that was marginally significant (p=0·03; figure 3 and webappendix p 4 ) if considered in isolation, but it was no longer significant if multiplied by 11 to allow for multiple comparisons (p=0·33).

Plasma Lp-PLA 2 activity did not correlate with CSF biomarkers nor with white matter changes within diagnoses, apart from a marginally significant inverse association with CSF Aβ42 in aMCI (r = -0.29, P = 0.03) (Table 3 ).

[ 16 ] noted a marginally significant ( P = 0.03) negative correlation between intron divergence and size for first introns (but not other introns) in the dataset of Halligan et al.

Furthermore, the difference between mean amplitudes for alternate uses ( M = −1.96, SE = 0.25) and common uses was marginally significant ( p = 0.03, d = 0.40).

In contrast, StromalScore demonstrated weaker yet marginally significant correlations across datasets ( p value ≈ 0.03–0.09), indicating that high-TIL-80 score tumors exhibit both increased immune infiltration and modest stromal enrichment.

When we analyzed the data by site, the effect of day of week is marginally significant ( P = 0.03 for site 1; P = 0.02 for site 2; P = 0.003 for site 3).

The interaction effects, emotion × aggression, F (2.31, 117.69) = 1.83, p = 0.16, η p 2 = 0.04, and emotion × group, F (2.31, 117.69) = 0.33, p = 0.75, η p 2 = 0.007, were also nonsignificant Interestingly, a quadratic contrast for facial emotion was marginally significant, F (1, 51) = 4.76, p = 0.03, suggesting slightly more errors for anger and sadness than for happiness, but this trend did not survive the omnibus test.

We only detected a marginally significant correlation between the NAc ALFF and HAMD scores in the REST-meta-MDD cohort ( p = .03).

When these factors were included in the model, there was at best marginally significant evidence for associations with tubular growth pattern (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.93; P = 0.03) and tubule formation (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.97 to 2.78; P = 0.07).

Marginally significant differences were observed in Zurich ( P = 0.03) and Midland ( P = 0.04), but no pairwise comparison remained significant after global Bonferroni correction ( Table S9 ; Fig.

In addition, the univariate comparisons indicated a marginally significant main effect of personalised risk message on positive outcome expectancies, F (1, 324) = 5.00, p = .03, η p 2 = .02 (α = .025).

In fact, the SiCE was apparent only for pairs containing 1 [ F (1, 115) = 34.06, MSE = 166,254, η 2 p = 0.23], with no evidence of linear modulation (Figure 1C ), and was minimal and marginally significant for pairs without 1 [ F (1, 117) = 3.85, MSE = 32,329, η 2 p = 0.03] (Figure 1D ).

Regarding statistical comparisons between Groups 1 and 2, interaction post hoc tests identified a marginally significant difference in mean intragastric pH between treatment groups on day 1 ( P = .03) but not for MPT intragastric pH ≥3 and ≥4 ( P = .15 and P = .30).

Interestingly, rs2471083 alleles, regardless of their parental origin, show marginally significant association (P = 0.03) with KCNK9 expression levels in the hippocampus ( http://www.broadinstitute.org/gtex/ ).

Weekly consumption of 1–7 units of wine was associated with a marginally significant smaller decline, while consumption of 8–14 units of wine was associated with a decline that was 1.5 IQ points lower ( p = 0.030) than no consumption of wine.

This was marginally significant ( p = 0.03; binary logistic regression with gender as the factor).

With Bonferroni adjustment for 15 comparisons ( Figure 1 ), leg-minus-forearm differences were marginally significant ( P =0.03–0.06).

While the main effect of distractor frequency on sensitivity estimates was marginally significant [ F (1,185) = 5.3, p = 0.03], the main effect of distractor intensity and the intensity × frequency interaction failed to achieve statistical significance ( p values >0.05).

A marginally significant recall direction by domain interaction was identified ( F (1,36) = 4.99; p = .03; η 2 = .12), with spatial backward spans significantly longer than verbal backward spans while no significant differences between spatial and verbal forward spans was identified.