“marginally significant”

However, both sexes exhibited a significant increase in DBP following exposure to noise C at 90 dB, and a marginally significant increase in SBP (men p=0.067; women p=0.167).

Once bite forces were z -score standardised, method was no longer significantly retained; however, a significant model linking bite to size could not be produced, although the model was marginally significant ( P =0.067).

More importantly, the analysis also revealed a marginally significant interaction between offer fairness and social status, F (2,50) = 2.86, p = 0.067, η 2 partial = 0.10.

A Generalized Linear Model with predictors contour density (4.5 or 5.5 mm), contour-background ratio condition (fixed ratio or fixed background), and number of digits (one or all) showed main effects for contour density (Wald χ 2 df = 1 = 590.05, p<.0001) and for contour-background ratio (Wald χ 2 df = 1 = 9.53, p<.01), and a marginally significant interaction between these two factors (Wald χ 2 df = 1 = 3.36, p = .067).

Household education also contributes notably (β = 1.014), though its effect is marginally significant ( p = .067).

A comparable, marginally significant relation appeared for Discrepancy Medical Team ( b = −0.11, t (229) = −1.84, p = 0.067, R 2 = 0.02), and the association was strongest for Discrepancy Specialists ( b = −0.23, t (219) = −3.83, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.07).

Event-Related Potential Results N1 As shown in Figures 2B,D , the 2(game-result) × 2(category) ANOVA for N1 peak amplitude showed a marginally significant interaction between two variables [ F (1,32) = 3.60, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0.101].

The presence of beta-lactam antibiotics was marginally significant ( p = 0.067).

The interaction between validity and distractor type was marginally significant, F(1,13) = 3.98, MSE = 24, p = .067.

For CS+ marginally significant decreased ratings were associated with higher STAIS#2 scores for block 4, r (50) = -0.26, p = 0.067, and block 5, r (50) = -0.26, p = 0.070; for CS- marginally significant increased ratings were related to increased STAIS#2 scores for block 3, r (50) = 0.27, p = 0.056, and block 4, r (50) = 0.25, p = 0.076.

There was also only a marginally significant indirect effect of the expectation of the robot’s future role on the interaction evaluation via perceived sociability and competence (β = .15, SE = 0.07, p = .067).

In STARR, other statins were associated with reduced colectomy rates as well (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.57–1.01; Supplementary Table 5 ) that was marginally significant ( P = .067).

Regression analyses suggested a significant linear relation between beat‐to‐meter ratio and RMSSD in the duple condition (Pearson r = 0.694, R‐square = 0.481, p = .004, slope = −0.56, intercept = 1.83) (Figure 4a ) and a marginally significant linear relation between the two measures in the triple condition (Pearson r = 0.485, R‐square = 0.23, p = .067, slope = −0.29, intercept = 1.74) (Figure 4b ).

Additionally, a supplementary correlation analysis between the bias index and PHQ-9 scores ( Figure 5 c) showed a marginally significant negative correlation ( r = −0.210, p = 0.067, FDR-corrected p = 0.067).

Moreover, two way repeated-measure ANOVA (consistency & patch visual field) showed a marginally significant effect on the visual field in the visual-delay task [ Figure 6A : visual field: F (1,27) = 3.645, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0. 119; consistency: F (1,27) = 1.784, p = 0.197, η p 2 = 0.061; interaction: F (1,27) = 1.691, p = 0.204, η p 2 = 0.059].

Although similar enhancement in conditioned freezing of earthquake-experienced mice was observed in the context-dependent test 48 h after conditioning ( Figure 4C ), group differences were marginally significant (one-way ANOVA: F (2, 20) = 3.11, p = 0.067).

We found a marginally significant increase in Ki67 signal in the poor-responder tumors when evaluating Ki67 signal only in EGR1 + /human nucleoli + cells or EGR1 + /human nuclei + cells ( p = 0.067).

We observed a marginally significant association between chronic stress and rTL ( p = 0.067).

A marginally significant interaction effect was found between gender and picture type for emotional experience (F (1,25) = 3.80, p = 0.067; ηP 2 = 0.13).

An independent sample t -test indicated that, similar to Study 1, there was only a marginally significant difference in self-reported SES between the two groups, t (100) = 1.85, p = 0.067, Cohen’s d = 0.37.

valenced (i.e., angry and happy) faces revealed a marginally significant effect, F (1,78) = 3.44, p = .067, η 2 p = .04, indicating that angry ( M = 442.69 ms, SD = 131.17) and happy faces ( M = 438.59 ms, SD = 133.72) produced more attentional adhesion than neutral ones ( M = 432.20 ms, SD = 134.74).

Furthermore, the restricted cubic spline regression analysis in our study indicated a non-linear relationship between EO exposure and PhenoAgeAccel, with a marginally significant non-linear component ( p = 0.067).

Significant/marginally significant effects were only observed in both response rates and HDRS-17 decreases for VEN (odds ratio = 2.53 [95% CI 0.94–6.80], p = 0.067; HDRS-17 difference: −2.7 [95% CI −5.5 to 0.0], p = 0.054) and for SSRI+PST (odds ratio = 2.46 [95% CI 0.92 to 6.62], p = 0.074; HDRS-17 difference: −3.1 [95% CI −5.8 to −0.3], p = 0.032).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between the infant’s mean Hr and the caregiver’s S-PICTS score in the CT-optimal condition ( ρ = −0.55, p = 0.067) but not in the slow or in the fast velocity conditions (respectively ρ = .068, p = 0.811 and ρ = .309, p = 0.283).

VEGF treatment induced a further increase in CD443MUT cellular binding compared to non-induced cells, although this result was statistically marginally significant (P = 0.067, n = 3; Figure 3B ).