Notably, a marginally significant (p = 0.067) interaction existed between the TyG index and smoking status with regard to the risk of DES-ISR.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
In the crude model, the inactive health-related behavior class was significantly associated with greater levels of IL-6 ( β = 0.187, SE (standard error) = 0.069, p = 0.007) and cMetS ( β = 0.921, SE = 0.392, p = 0.020), whereas the positive association between the inactive health-related behavior class and hs-CRP ( β = 0.228, SE = 0.124) were marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
Our results indicate that there is a marginally significant cross-level relationship between group-level change impact and change fairness interactions for change self-efficacy (γ = -0.53, p = 0.067) and positive experience to change (γ = -0.47, p = 0.054), as shown in Model 4 and Model 10 in Table 3 .
A bivariate logistic regression using an HIV-1 VL decline <0.96 log revealed that CD4 + was marginally significant (p = 0.067).
Low SVI was associated with a 14.6% lower likelihood of discharge, though this result was marginally significant (HR=0.854, p=0.067), and high SVI was not statistically significant (HR=0.879, p=0.102).
= 0.10, t 67 = 2.83, p = 0.006, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.09, 0.49]) and marginally significant for fatigue ( b = 0.29, s.e. = 0.15, t 78 = 1.86, p = 0.067, 95% CI [−0.02, 0.59]) but not tense arousal ( b = 0.18, s.e. = 0.13, t 62 = 1.37, p = 0.177, 95% CI [−0.08, 0.43]).
The main effects of moral scenario, F (1, 39) = 285.86, p < 0.001, η 2 g = 0.71, and temperature, F (1, 39) = 5.33, p = 0.026, η 2 g = 0.08, were significant, and the interaction between temperature and scenario was marginally significant, F (1, 39) = 3.54, p = 0.067, η 2 g = 0.03.
Notably, Karnofsky's performance scores (KPS) and clinical stage showed a marginally significant association with OS ( P = 0.067 and P = 0.088) (Figure 1B and 1C ), suggesting they might be additional confounding factors required for control.
There were marginally significant differences in P1 amplitude for no makeup, light makeup, and heavy makeup, Makeup type: F (2, 21) = 3.08, p = .067, η p 2 = .23.
Furthermore, the association between nonresident parent physical activity and adolescent physical activity was marginally significant (p = 0.067).
For CS+ marginally significant decreased ratings were associated with higher STAIS#2 scores for block 4, r (50) = -0.26, p = 0.067, and block 5, r (50) = -0.26, p = 0.070; for CS- marginally significant increased ratings were related to increased STAIS#2 scores for block 3, r (50) = 0.27, p = 0.056, and block 4, r (50) = 0.25, p = 0.076.
ATL GABA- MD network) and showed a marginally significant result (z-score = 1.49, p = 0.067).
Conversely, working mothers tended to have higher knowledge levels, though this was marginally significant (B=0.758, p=0.067, Exp(B)=2.134).
Generally, North American and European experts disagreed on the ranking of priorities, with an exception for the importance of Biodiversity and Taxonomic Challenges, for which the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of their overall category rankings indicated marginally significant correlation ( r s = 0.633, p = 0.067).
Additionally, a marginally significant positive relationship was observed with the intradensity of the unaffected hemisphere ( R 2 =0.21, p =0.067) for the same subset/band.
We found a marginally significant effect of COVID-19 lockdown for free days ( F (1, 312) = 3.382; p = .067; η 2 = 0.011; M before = 08:32, SD = 01:00; M during = 08:23, SD = 01:10), but not for workdays ( F (1, 312) = 0.399; p = .528; η 2 = 0.001), similar to the results reported above.
In addition, a marginally significant difference was found between the father’s occupation as a farmer and the number of bacteria in the children’s microbiota (p = 0.067), where 60% of sons of a farmer had 0–2 bacteria (60%) (Table 1 ).
Results The manual therapy group demonstrated a greater treatment effect compared with active rehabilitation for RMQ (mean difference 3.6, 95% CI 1.1 – 6.2, p = 0.006) and PRI (7.1, 95% CI 2.0 – 12.2, p = 0.007) and marginally significant results for VAS (15, 95% CI -1.1 to 31.2, p = 0.067).
There was a marginally significant difference between urban boys and girls in terms of weight status (p = 0.067).
The presence of beta-lactam antibiotics was marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
3 a and b) and differences for SKJ were marginally significant (Mann-Whitney test: p -value = 0.067, Fig. 3 c).
The interaction between Previous Accuracy × Time was marginally significant [ F (1,38) = 3.57, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0.09].
combined measure; B = 7.805, p = 0.029) and marginally significant with risk of readmission (involuntary medication vs. combined measure; OR = 0.404, p = 0.067) in the five-year follow-up.
Intraoperatively, patients perceived a marginally significant 0.4 points more pain in the eye treated with tetracaine than in the eye treated with proparacaine (95% CI 0.0–0.8, P =0.067), after controlling for pain experienced during drop instillation.
(AB/AC), which was marginally significant (p=0.067).