“marginally significant”

Moreover, in the dominant model analysis, the frequency of rs1800693 TC + CC genotypes was also marginally significant between the severely and mildly ill patients (72.7% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.069) ( Table S2 ). 3.

It showed marginally significant differences in their visual outcomes ( p = 0.069) between groups with and without intravitreal dexamethasone.

We only find a marginally significant 3-way interaction coefficient ( p = 0.069) and therefore still insufficient support for H2 when current assets to current liabilities is used for slack.

The district population showed a positive but marginally significant association in the highest quartile (OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 0.94–5.27; p = 0.069).

P2 components (140–190 ms) The Model × Electrodes interaction was marginally significant (F[1,14] = 3.890, p = 0.069, η p 2 = 0.218).

Post hoc Bonferroni‐corrected analyses showed a marginally significant improvement in regulation success following OXT in the high anxiety group (reappraisal success: PLC = 4.14 ± 0.94, OXT = 4.82 ± 0.91, p = 0.069, see Figure 2B ). 2.3 fMRI Results 2.3.1 Top‐Down Guidance of Threat‐Related Perception and Attention In order to investigate the top‐down and bottom‐up properties of the emotion regulation paradigm, we initially extracted the time courses from the clusters in the primary visual network, higher visual network, fusiform gyrus, and visuospatial attention network during stimulus presentation.

The global test revealed significant relationship between species distribution and environmental variables (model 2, p = 0.004) and marginally significant relationship between species composition and functional traits (model 4, p = 0.069).

Kinematic Errors According to KE rate analysis (see left panel of Figure 5 ) for the next ANOVA (movement complexity × congruence), the main effect of movement complexity was significant, F (1,15) = 8.110, p = 0.012, η p 2 = 0.351, as lifting action presented a larger KE rate than reaching (3.9 and 2.04, respectively.) A main effect of congruence was marginally significant, F (1,15) = 3.843, p = 0.069, η p 2 = 0.204, as incongruent trials presented a larger KE rate than congruent ones (3.51% vs. 2.43%, respectively).

Domain was a marginally significant moderator, Q (4) = 8.69, p = .069, k = 28.

37% in the PAZ only group, a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.069).

In the older sample, no brain regions that were associated with higher reading scores survived FDR cluster correction, but the left thalamus could be considered marginally significant (FDR cluster corrected p = 0.069, r = 0.40; Fig. 5c , 5e ).

When analyzed separately by domain, this effect held for risk perception in the social ( P = 0.005) and recreational ( P = 0.025) domains was marginally significant in the financial ( P = 0.069) domain and was nonsignificant but in the hypothesized direction in the health ( P = 0.12) and ethical ( P = 0.67) domains.

Results of Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests further demonstrated that while the South region score had marginally significant differences with the Northwest region score ( Δ mean = 0.98, SE = 0.39, P = 0.069) and the West region score ( Δ mean = 0.86, SE = 0.35, P = 0.078), there was no significant difference between any two of these four regions (see Table S2 for all descriptive statistics).

A marginally significant linear treatment × day interaction was observed ( P = 0.069) for serum homocysteine concentrations ( Table 6 ).

This challenge is likely affected by trials in which children’s visual access differed from that of their social partner (i.e., Does Not See trials) as is reflected in the marginally significant difference between Can See (M = 82.61, SD = 21.18) and Does Not See trials (M = 76.26, SD = 25.77) trials (paired-samples t-test: t (43) = 1.86, p =.069). 3.2.

Finally, in the group of participants with the GG genotype, we found a marginally significant increase in DBP at the pain threshold, b = 8.03, SE = 4.42, 95%CI [−0.64, 16.70], t = 1.82, p = 0.069, while the increase at pain tolerance was significant, b = 9.68, SE = 4.42, 95%CI [1.01, 18.35], t = 2.19, p = 0.029. 3.

Results A significant treatment effect was seen in nightmare intensity on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-I) (p=0.026) and a marginally significant effect on nightmare frequency (p=0.069).

Among religious groups, 20.7% of Orthodox women experienced verbal discouragement of family planning, compared to 13.0% of Muslim women and 14.1% of women with Protestant/Other religious affiliation; these differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

The difference between transposed pseudo-words and substituted pseudo-words was marginally significant (b = −0.21, SE = 0.12, z = −1.82, p = 0.069).

We found more negative ERPs for the phonologically related condition than the unrelated condition, which was significant in mid-anterior region ( t (25) = 2.19, p = 0.038) and marginally significant in left-anterior region ( t (25) = 1.90, p = 0.069), while there was no significant difference between the two conditions in other areas ( p s > 0.1).

In the model 1, BMD had positive correlations with daily intakes of calcium ( β =0.126, p=0.001), potassium ( β =0.213, p=0.005), SFA ( β =0.165, p=0.010), magnesium ( β =0.336, p=0.039), breads ( β =0.025, p=0.069: marginally significant), milk and dairy products ( β =0.039, p=0.007), and fruits ( β =0.023, p=0.038), and milk consumption at junior ( β =0.046, p=0.001) and senior ( β =0.034, p=0.009) high school, independently of log e (BMI), and time of survey.

The Cue x Time interaction was marginally significant, F (5.22, 208.65) = 2.06, p = .069, η p 2 = .05, CI 95 = [.00; .08], indicating slightly stronger threat discrimination in the second half of acquisition (see Fig. 3C ).

Interestingly, further analysis revealed that British participants perceived their past selves as being further away than their future selves at a marginally significant level, F (1, 80) = 3.41, p = 0.069, Cohen’s d = 0.407.

Indeed, there was a marginally significant difference in agency index between the synchronous and asynchronous conditions (χ 2 = 3.32, df = 1, n = 20, P = 0.069), if another statistical criterion was applied to the data.

There was a significant age effect in the left lateral/middle occipital cluster, F (2, 241) = 4.585, p = .011, q = .035, where older adults had reduced occipital effect, and a marginally significant class effect, F (1, 241) = 3.337, p = .069, q = .148, such that successful agers had greater subsequent memory effect than average agers.