“marginally significant”

There were significant or marginally significant interactions between stimulus position and category at 8‐ to 14‐s time points (8 s: lV1v, p = .069; 10 s: rV1d, p = .058; 12 s: lV1d, p = .026, rV1d, p = .009, rV1v, p = .014; 14 s: lV1v, p = .045, rV1d, p = .053, rV1v, p = .008; no significant interaction at 6 s [all p‐ values >.25]).

We also conducted a further exploratory analysis in female patients who did not use any other NSAIDs, and found that the association between aspirin use and a lower risk of depression was marginally significant ( OR = 0.74; 95% CI : 0.53, 1.02; p = 0.069).

Predictors in the final model for current overall functioning remained significant (baseline symptom severity) or marginally significant (age, baseline parent-reported impairment; 0.001 < p < 0.069, R 2 = 16.8 %).

There was a significant age effect in the left lateral/middle occipital cluster, F (2, 241) = 4.585, p = .011, q = .035, where older adults had reduced occipital effect, and a marginally significant class effect, F (1, 241) = 3.337, p = .069, q = .148, such that successful agers had greater subsequent memory effect than average agers.

3 b), and we found a marginally significant positive effect on red deer BCS when individuals tested positive for antibodies of T. gondii (p = 0.069).

As for the healthy controls, the increase in FSS score reached marginally significant levels (before: M = 35.056, SE = 2.438; after: M = 40.944, SE = 2.255; p = 0.069) (Cohen’s d = 0.786, 95% CI = [−0.124, 1.696]).

After further adjustment for cardiometabolic risk factors, these inverse associations were slightly attenuated but remained statistically significant for CVD incidence (HR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97; P = 0.002) and marginally significant for stroke (HR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88–1.00; P = 0.069).

Conscientiousness was marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

Condition (i.e., whether a population originated from unaffected or oiled areas) had marginally significant effects on genetic distance ( F ST ) among populations (GLM, F = 4.06, df = 1, P = 0.069, Table S3 in Supporting Information ).

They were also significantly correlated with lexical decision accuracy, particularly the event-based task, potentially due to the shared reliance of the ongoing and target-detection demands on lexical processing. Correlations between the naturalistic PM task and other measures were modest but nevertheless significant for the event-based PM task ( p = .025) and lexical decision task ( p = .027), marginally significant for the time-based PM task ( p = .069), and highly significant for the intention-offloading/nonoffloading task ( p = .00004).

Whereas no significant difference in female weight was observed 4 days after dsRNA treatment ( P = 0.9847), a marginally significant increase was observed at 8 days ( P = 0.0694) with females becoming significantly heavier at 12 days after PmRuvbl1 silencing ( P <0.0001), compared to control ( Fig 1E ).

Effects of IPAG on ergosterol content were marginally significant (two-way ANOVA, F = 2.202, p = 0.0694), and the effect of LiCl was significant (two way-ANOVA, F = 3.012, p = 0.0391), and there was an interaction between the two factors (two Way-ANOVA, F = 2.260, p = 0.0167).

Interaction effects over time points were only significant for explosive upper body strength [F (2.112) = 5.9670, p = 0.00345], although marginally significant for explosive leg strength [F (2.108) = 2.7179, p = 0.06986] ( Table 5 ). 4.

The jobless people were following the local community for obtaining information (more than 50%), and the relationship between the source of information and occupation was marginally significant (χ 2 = 23.863, p = 0.0699).

Veterans decreased in perceived structure from the military to their first civilian job ( p = 0.03) whereas civilian students non-significantly increased in their perceived structure from their education to their first post-graduation job ( p = 0.29), resulting in a marginally significant veteran status by context interaction, F (1, 178) = 3.27, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01 (see Study 1 Supplemental Analysis in supplemental materials for full results).

The study found marginally significant differences between Sad and Neutral faces (p = .070) ( Table 3 ).

With the variability associated with age and verbal IQ controlled, right hippocampal volume emerged as a marginally significant predictor ( p = .07) of open-ended stem fact recall.

In contrast, the congruity–valence interaction was marginally significant in the H-EC condition, F (1, 80) = 3.28, p = 0.07, partial η 2 = 0.04.

Follow-up analyses revealed that while there were no significant interactions between group and trial quadrant for phases IS and NL (all ps ≥ 0.160), there was a marginally significant interaction for the FT data, F (1,62) = 3.399, p = 0.070, partial η 2 = 0.052.

However, the associations of N2c stage with OS (HR = 2.54 [95% CI = 1.21–5.33], p = 0.01) and PFS were statistically significant and marginally significant (HR = 1.93 [95% CI = 0.96–3.90], p = 0.07), respectively ( Table 3 ).

This difference remained marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

However, a main effect of time period was significant ( F [2.40, 28.79] = 32.34, p < 0.01, η 2 p = 0.73) and an interaction of test beverage × time period was marginally significant ( F [3.40, 40.74] = 2.45, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.17).

However, within a sub-sample of CHC member respondents, there was a marginally significant decrease in trust (−0.26, CI (−0.53, 0.02), p = 0.07) and social solidarity (−0.27, CI (−0.56, 0.02), p = 0.07) factor scores from baseline to final.

Behavioral Results Repeated-measures analyses of covariances (ANCOVA, Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected), with music kinds, calorie, and taste as within-subjects factors, and hunger and desire to eat as covariates, revealed marginally significant main effects of calorie, F (1, 21) = 3.64, p = 0.07, partial η p 2 = 0.15; the score of the high-calorie foods was greater than that of the low-calorie foods.

A marginally significant association was also observed between adherence to the exercise goal and percent weight change ( P = 0.07) ( Table 3 ).