“marginally significant”

Neutrophil concentration showed marginally significant interactions between treatment and time ( P = 0.07), with higher levels in the PM40 group.

The ANOVA yielded a predicted Emotional Intensity × Initial Implementation interaction that was marginally significant [ F (1, 27) = 3.36, P = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.11; Figure 2 , Supplementary Table S1 for all effects].

When looking for correlations among rates across types of mutations, CNV duplication and deletion rates were the only two categories that exhibited even a marginally significant correlation (Pearson’s correlation = 0.62, t = 2.13, df = 7, P = 0.07), whereas no positive or negative correlations were found among rates for any other mutation types in this study ( supplementary table S6 , Supplementary Material online ).

Additionally, a decrease in the parasite intensity to marginally significant values ( p < 0.07; df = 34; t = 2.041) occurred.

The three-way interaction between group, context and trial was marginally significant (χ 2 (2) = 5.07, p = 0.07), and analyses by group showed a marginally significant interaction of context-by-trial number in controls (χ 2 (2) = 5.26, p = 0.07) but not patients ( p = 0.21).

Faces showed a similar pattern with own face eliciting a more negative N250 than other face ( p < 0.001), a marginally significant difference between own and target faces ( p < 0.07), and a significant difference between target and other faces ( p < 0.01) in the first half.

For drinking time, there was a marginally significant trend where Nguni cattle drank 0.9 % more than Bonsmara cattle ( B = 0.9, SE = 0.4, p = 0.07).

The analysis shows a marginally significant difference between the two patterns ( t ( 1 , 57 ) = 1.83 , p = .07 , Cohen’s d = 0.24 ; Figure 12(b) ).

We used a three-way rmANOVA with the factors HEMISPHERE, MODIFICATION and AGENCY and found a marginally significant interaction effect of MODIFICATION and AGENCY [ F (1 , 34) = 3.57, p = 0.07].

The biomass averaged across the seasons demonstrated a marginally significant ( p = 0.07) poleward decrease ( Figure 2 a), which was associated with the decrease in mean annual temperature and with variation in fine root biomass ( Table 3 ).

In the subgroup of patients who were physically active during the initial 2-year period (224 individuals, 34.4%), loosing ≥5% of body weight was associated with markedly significant reductions, by 80% and 79%, in risk for total CVEs and MACEs, respectively, and a marginally significant ( P =0.07) risk reduction of 72% for cardiovascular death in relation to the subgroup that gained weight.

For the P2 component, repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a marginally significant main effect of salience, F (1, 25) = 3.68, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.13, in the absence of a significant congruency effect, F (1, 25) = 0.04, p = 0.85, η 2 p = 0.001.

The other study found marginally significant differences between groups, with a greater decrease in mean hs-CRP with 100% OJ intake but lower final hs-CRP concentrations with OJ from concentrate ( P = 0.07) ( 41 ).

The main effect of group was marginally significant [ X 2 (2) = 5.14, p = 0.07].

This was primarily the case for the trustworthiness trait [congruent: Pearson’s r = 0.0076 ± 0.066 (mean ± SD across neurons); incongruent: r = −0.0075 ± 0.062; two-tailed paired t test: t (628) = 2.96, p = 0.003]; the dominance trait only showed a marginally significant difference between conditions (congruent: r = −0.0073 ± 0.060; incongruent: r = 0.0015 ± 0.060; t (628) = 1.82, p = 0.07).

3B ; though marginally significant due to the data size: p-value = 0.07, permutation test) and 7.32 Hz (Fig. 3C ) for the correlation and attentional index, respectively).

Importantly, there was also a marginally significant interaction effect between input order and insight ( F (1.29, 77.45) = 3.16, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05), with participants exhibiting insight having significantly smaller RT differences for inputs 2–4 ( MD = 131.59, p = 0.013), replicating previous results (compare Figures 2A, C ), and marginally significant smaller RT differences for inputs 5–7 ( MD = 85.91, p = 0.09) than those without insight.

Participants’ Evaluation An ANOVA on the participants’ evaluation revealed a significant main effect of PDB (M high PDB = 4.26, M low PDB = 4.84; F(1,92) = 7.706, p = 0.007) and marginally significant main effect of the purchase type (M material purchase = 4.35, M experiential purchase = 4.74; F(1,92) = 3.407, p = 0.07).

We found a marginally significant group effect [ F (1,39.98) = 3.389, p = 0.07, estimate = 228, SE = 124; effect size = 0.51], length effect [ F (1,28.63) = 18.58, p < 0.001, estimate = 239, SE = 58.1; effect size = 0.52], and spelling type effect [ F (1,29.59) = 6.23, p < 0.05, estimate = 131, SE = 52.4; effect size = 0.53).

The difference between high dose BRD and healthy groups was marginally significant ( P = 0.070), while the difference between the low dose BRD and healthy groups were insignificant ( P = 0.592).

According to Table 2 , the crude RR illustrated a marginally significant effect of β-glucan ointment on wound healing (RR = 5.65; 95% CI: 0.85, 37.55; p = 0.07); however, RD showed a significant difference between the probability of remission in patients receiving β-glucan ointment and those receiving Stratamed ointment.

When corrected for age and APOE genotype, only the LC4 remained statistically significant, whereas LC1 was marginally significant ( P =0.07).

Results The results of analysis of covariance with repeated measures indicated that although not statistically significant, both groups showed a notable decrease in anxiety with a marginally significant main effect of time ( F 1 =3.485; P =.07; η 2 =0.047) but no significant main effect of group and no significant interaction effect of time with group.

However, when adjusting the variables of sex, BMI, presence of diabetes, history of CVD, DBP, nPCR, and urine volume, a marginally significant association of iPD with CV mortality (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25–1.05; p = 0.07) was observed.

The main effect of Group was marginally significant, F (1, 59) = 3.31, p = 0.07, ηp2 = 0.05.