Similar results were obtained, with the addition that higher total family income became a marginally significant correlate of increased average vaccination likelihood ( p = .07).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Model 1: Dietary Supplements During Pregnancy and ADHD and ASD Traits in Children at Age 6 (Path C’) The regression models in Table 2 indicate a marginally significant inverse association between maternal multivitamin use and ADHD (β = −0.48; t = 1.81; p < 0.07) and a significant association between maternal diet quality and ADHD (β = −0.30; t = −3.69; p < 0.001).
The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of Target, F (1, 17) = 3.66, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.18; however, we found no significant main effect of Cue, F (1, 17) = 0.75, p = 0.399, η p 2 = 0.04.
The number of degenerated cysts was higher in younger and older pigs compared to those infected at intermediate ages, showing marginally significant differences between age groups (Kruskal–Wallis H -test, H = 10.29, df = 5, P = 0.07).
The older adults showed a significant effect for Target Gender (χ 2 = 4.34, df: 1, p < 0.05), and this effect was marginally significant for the fifth-graders (χ 2 = 3.37, df: 1, p = 0.07).
A negative correlation was seen between age and the frequency of engagement, that is, as participant age increased, their engagement frequency decreased by 1.85 units, a relationship that was marginally significant ( P =.07) (see Table 2 ).
The relation tended to be marginally significant and negative in classes with high classroom group-oriented norm ( p = 0.07) but not significant in classes with low classroom group-oriented norm ( p = 0.30).
The results demonstrated a marginally significant increase in WBC (mean increase = 667/μL, P = .07) and a statistically significant increase in ANC (mean increase = 1130/μL, P = .003) when switching blood draws from 0630 to 0830.
The main effect of group was marginally significant ( F (1,59) = 3.42, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.06, power = 0.44), while that of choice was not significant ( F (1,59) = 0.87, p = 0.36, η p 2 = 0.02, power = 0.15).
Neither bogus pipeline procedures affected goals, p s ≥ .17 (only for relationship disruption we found a marginally significant interaction of both factors, F (1,77) = 3.38, p = .07, η p 2 = .04).
Marginally significant evidence also emerged for a two-way interaction between Stimulus Type and Distance, F (1, 121) = 3.28, p = .07, η 2 p = .03, 95% CI [0.00; 0.10], BF 10 = 0.83.
Assessment of Opportunity Costs and Placebo Effects The counseling group increased the number of performed cognitive, physical, and social leisure activity types (excluding JP solving) by 1.4, which is a marginally significant increase relative to the JP group ( p = 0.07).
INTRO (Model 3) There was a marginally significant age effect ( β = 0.083, SE = 0.046, z = 1.814, p = 0.07; post hoc power = 49%), suggesting a trend in more indefinite nominals (felicitous for INTRO) with increasing age.
We observed a marginally significant effect indicating that Utilitarian claims are negatively related to participants subjective taste ratings (coefficient: −0.7428, P = 0.07, obtained from linear regression using clustered standard errors at the session level).
Manifest anxiety showed a marginally significant influence ( P = .070), but multiple comparison analysis showed no significant differences for T0 to T1 ( P = .128), T0 to T2 ( P = .150), and T1 to T2 ( P = .985) (Table 2 ).
At an above-average income, fWHR was a marginally significant predictor of Machiavellianism, β = −.36, p = .07. fWHR was not a significant predictor of narcissism, β = .04, p = .71.
For the commission error (CE), there was a marginally significant valence effect (F(2,114) = 2.717, p = 0.070).
The load × group interaction effect was marginally significant [ F (2,92) = 2.65, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.06].
Both mastery and control experiences had a significant and negative relationships with emotional exhaustion (r = −0.14, p < 0.05 and r = −0.41, p < 0.001, respectively) whereas the relationship between relaxation and emotional exhaustion was marginally significant level (r = −0.13, p = 0.07).
The Lighting × Activation ANOVA on Mental Effort showed no effects involving the lighting factor ( Fs < 1); only the main effect of activation was marginally significant, F (1,23) = 3.59, p = 0.07 (mental effort tended to be perceived as higher in high vs. low arousal conditions).
The increase in step length for the normal leg was marginally significant ( p = 0.070).
Next, when the clinical features of the 84 ESCC cases were stratified by the pathohistological response of the primary lesion to NAC, the distribution of pathological T stage was significantly different between responders and non-responders ( P < 0.0001) whereas the distribution of pathological stage and pretreatment serum CEA value were marginally significant ( P = 0.07, Table 2 ).
Correlations between the three speech measures and tinnitus awareness and tinnitus impact were not significant at the alpha < 0.05 level (two-tailed distribution), although a marginally significant positive correlation was seen between BKB sentence testing in quiet scores and tinnitus awareness ( r = 0.185, p = 0.07).
There was a marginally significant difference in initial sputum culture positivity between the two groups ( P = 0.07), with DM+ being more likely to present with a positive sputum culture.
In the multivariate model, gender was marginally significant, with women less likely to report transactional sex than men (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04–1.14, p = 0.07).