Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Key differences in significance were that the previously significant effects of attitude accessibility (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .13), social desirability (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .15), rated ease of representation (β = −.061, 95% CI = [−0.16, −0.03], p = .20), anticipated regret ( Q = 2.77, p = .10), and behavior domain ( Q = 5.59, p = .23) on the QBE became non-significant, and the previously significant effect of question type became marginally significant ( Q = 5.197, p = .07).
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
2 A) with no significant main effect of session [F(4, 120) = 0.22, P = 0.93, η 2 = 0.0002 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0, 0.0003)] and a significant interaction between session and contingency [F(4, 120) = 3.35, P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0008, 0.01)], whereas the interaction between session and face perception was marginally significant [F(4, 120) = 2.20, P = 0.07, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0003, 0.003)].
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Age-group, as a continuous variable, was a significant predictor of symptoms other than due to RSI (p = 0.05), marginally significant (p = 0.07) for the outcome 'symptoms of upper limbs' – with a trend for protection with increasing age, but became non-significant for the two other outcomes (Table 6 ).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
The following univariate ANOVAs indicated that following a sad mood induction, participants who received emotionally engaging instructions exhibited a marginally significant greater decline in general mood [ F (1, 26) = 3.70, p = 0.07] and a greater incline in sad rating [ F (1, 26) = 6.24, p < 0.05] than participants who received emotionally disengaging instructions, compared to baseline mood ratings.
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
In addition, the MoRAL score showed the best calibration function with a non-significant p value ( p = 0.15) by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test; the WCM model and the AFP model, the second and third best models evaluated by c -index, were found to be less accurate with marginally significant p values ( p = 0.07, and p = 0.06, respectively).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Overall, change in blood THg was largely explained by change in lean mass ( F 1,40 = 3.74, p = 0.06).When we tested treatments separately, there was a marginally significant relationship between change in blood THg and change in lean mass for the 0.6 ppm group ( F 1,17 = 1.95, p = 0.07), but not for the 0.1 ppm ( F 1,14 = 1.33, p = 0.26) or 0.0 ppm groups ( F 1,7 = 2.25, p = 0.18; Fig. 2 ).
marginally significantp=0.071.4× alphagold
Although the log-transformed change in AChE activity was not associated with any of these subclasses, change in BChE activity demonstrated a significant association with average percentage of behavioural symptoms (p=0.04) and a marginally significant association with average percentage of cognitive symptoms (p=0.07).