Key differences in significance were that the previously significant effects of attitude accessibility (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .13), social desirability (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .15), rated ease of representation (β = −.061, 95% CI = [−0.16, −0.03], p = .20), anticipated regret ( Q = 2.77, p = .10), and behavior domain ( Q = 5.59, p = .23) on the QBE became non-significant, and the previously significant effect of question type became marginally significant ( Q = 5.197, p = .07).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Bd-infection had a marginally significant effect on the community structure of the skin microbiota (PERMANOVA: F 1,23 = 1.73, P = 0.07), while the effect of CFCM treatment was non-significant both alone ( F 6,17 = 0.15, P = 0.57) and in interaction with Bd-infection ( F 3,17 = 0.35, P = 0.94).
Crucially, the main effect for PMEA level, while not significant at the α = 0.05 threshold, was found to be marginally significant, [ F (1,116) = 3.305, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03].
The interaction between SOD and translucency was marginally significant ( F (1, 72) = 3.44, MSE = 0.44, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05).
Age also differed slightly between musicians and non-musicians, albeit marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
2 A) with no significant main effect of session [F(4, 120) = 0.22, P = 0.93, η 2 = 0.0002 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0, 0.0003)] and a significant interaction between session and contingency [F(4, 120) = 3.35, P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0008, 0.01)], whereas the interaction between session and face perception was marginally significant [F(4, 120) = 2.20, P = 0.07, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0003, 0.003)].
Daphnia that received a laboratory-derived microbial inoculum showed marginally significant interactions between infection and genotype or cyanobacterium treatment (infection × genotype: F = 3.3, df = 2,6.7, P = 0.07 and infection × cyanobacterium: F = 4.0, df = 1, 4.1, P = 0.07).
There was a marginally significant effect of trial type on the intercept: b = -0.16, χ 2 (1) = 3.4, p < .07.
Nevertheless, the wasp chose more the arms loaded with the natural putative concentration of ( E )-β-ocimene as compared to the solvent control, although the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.07) (Fig. 7 C , Supplementary Table 3).
Age-group, as a continuous variable, was a significant predictor of symptoms other than due to RSI (p = 0.05), marginally significant (p = 0.07) for the outcome 'symptoms of upper limbs' – with a trend for protection with increasing age, but became non-significant for the two other outcomes (Table 6 ).
There were marginally significant increases in net N-mineralization and nitrification rates in the UAN plots ( Fig. 6a ,b, p = 0.07 and 0.06, respectively for net N-mineralization and nitrification).
However, it is notable that in a sensitivity analysis that excluded one influential case, there was a marginally significant moderating effect of salivary total IgG on the HCMV IgG serum-saliva relation [ b = −0.00, t (82) = −1.84, p = 0.07].
The following univariate ANOVAs indicated that following a sad mood induction, participants who received emotionally engaging instructions exhibited a marginally significant greater decline in general mood [ F (1, 26) = 3.70, p = 0.07] and a greater incline in sad rating [ F (1, 26) = 6.24, p < 0.05] than participants who received emotionally disengaging instructions, compared to baseline mood ratings.
For Trial 3-S (see Figure 3 ), the fixed effects for time (F[2,129.8] = 4.1, p < 0.05) and randomization (F[2,96.1] = 3.1, p = 0.05) were significant, and the time by randomization effect was marginally significant (F[4,129.9] = 2.2, p = 0.07).
2d ‘Studies 7–16’), and a marginally significant stronger response ( P = 0.07) in the remaining study, suggesting that the BAAS can capture high-arousal positive experiences across stimulus modalities (i.e., vision and auditory).
We found marginally significant evidence indicating the hypothesized moderating effect of age on peer influence on STEM-related activities (β = −1.44, SE = 0.97, one-sided p = 0.07).
In addition, the MoRAL score showed the best calibration function with a non-significant p value ( p = 0.15) by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test; the WCM model and the AFP model, the second and third best models evaluated by c -index, were found to be less accurate with marginally significant p values ( p = 0.07, and p = 0.06, respectively).
Overall, change in blood THg was largely explained by change in lean mass ( F 1,40 = 3.74, p = 0.06).When we tested treatments separately, there was a marginally significant relationship between change in blood THg and change in lean mass for the 0.6 ppm group ( F 1,17 = 1.95, p = 0.07), but not for the 0.1 ppm ( F 1,14 = 1.33, p = 0.26) or 0.0 ppm groups ( F 1,7 = 2.25, p = 0.18; Fig. 2 ).
Although the log-transformed change in AChE activity was not associated with any of these subclasses, change in BChE activity demonstrated a significant association with average percentage of behavioural symptoms (p=0.04) and a marginally significant association with average percentage of cognitive symptoms (p=0.07).
Their survival curves begin to diverge at the 18 month time point and the difference is marginally significant (p < 0.07).
Moreover, a marginally significant positive association was seen between WHR (β = 0. 004, 95%CI = 0.00 to 0.008, p = 0.07) and GRS in adjusted model.
Nevertheless, there was a marginally significant difference in the ML at the C4/C5 segment (15.63 ± 1.47 mm vs. 15.18 ± 1.28 mm, p = 0.07).
The associations of grades of dipstick proteinuria with stages of localized periodontitis were marginally significant in Models 1–3 (β = 0.03, p = 0.07, 0.06 and 0.07, respectively).
Excluding the high control group (in which the manipulation was ineffective), revealed a marginally significant difference t (185) = -1.815, p = 0.07, d = 0.27; the low and high groups did not differ, t (162) = - 0.925, p = 0.36, d = 0.14.
The risk group effect was marginally significant F (1, 97) = 3.26, p = 0.07, ηp 2 = 0.03, and there was no group*sex interaction F (1, 97) = 0.03, p = 0.88, ηp 2 < 0.001.