“marginally significant”

There was also a marginally significant main effect of SQ F (1, 90) = 3.38, p = 0.070, with a negative coefficient (−0.00021).

Pairwise t -tests showed a significant difference between distance 1 and distance 3 [ t (16) = 2.81, p = 0.01] and a marginally significant difference between distance 2 and distance 3 [ t (16) = 1.95, p = 0.07].

The ∆TDQ scores reached a marginally significant difference between the MB and NoMB groups (∆TDQ score: −1.2 and −2.7 in the MB and NoMB groups, respectively; p = 0.07) ( Table 2 ).

This possibility is supported by the p-values of the statistical test between the non-target and the standard conditions during the 0 to 100 ms time window in the left MFG and the left IPS, both of which were marginally significant ( p = 0.07 and p = 0.10, respectively).

Regarding the two pandemic-related beliefs, government efficacy accounted for a significant addition (0.8%) of the variance in PSU (Δ F = 4.82, p = 0.03) beyond the variance explained by demographic variables; in contrast, self-efficacy only explained a marginally significant increment (0.6%) of the variance in PSU (Δ F = 3.34, p = 0.07).

The interaction group × session was marginally significant for Affection [ F (1, 28) = 3.42, MSE = 6.47, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.11] and Assertiveness [ F (1, 28) = 3.35, MSE = 3.99, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.11] subscales.

This result holds true for three quality of life domains: the physical (estimate = .085, p = .02), the social (estimate = .191, p = .009), and the psychological domain (estimate = .075, p = .026); the effect was marginally significant for the environmental domain (estimate = .077, p = .07).

The repeated measures ANOVA showed that SAR did not affect soil pH value in the PF ( p = 0.997), but it significantly reduced soil pH value in the BF ( p = 0.01) and the reduction was marginally significant in the MF ( p = 0.07).

Comparison between groups and survival analysis Comparison of clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients showed similar median age, gender, site and onset of metastases and median tumor size but a marginally significant difference in the median size of metastases was found (< 3 cm: 45.9 vs 53.7%; > 3 cm: 54.1 vs 46.3%; p = 0.07) (Table 1 ).

Interestingly, the result revealed that D-score made a marginally significant contribution to CSEBQ scores ( t = -1.85, p = 0.07), and the p-value of CNS scores for predicting Bag choice was also not far from significance ( p = .11).

Social anxiety reached a marginally significant main effect, F (1, 92) = 3.33, p = 0.07, ∂η 2 = 0.04, while degree of depressive symptoms did not, F (1, 92) < 0.10, p = 0.76.

The analysis shows a marginally significant difference between the two patterns ( t ( 1 , 57 ) = 1.83 , p = .07 , Cohen’s d = 0.24 ; Figure 12(b) ).

Of the secondary outcomes, the effect was statistically significant for anxiety (Cohen’s d, 0.41; P = .01) and marginally significant for post-traumatic stress (Cohen’s d, 0.35; P = .07) and traumatic grief (Cohen’s d, 0.26; P = .08).

When those with CAT C-262T C/C were defined as reference, those with CAT C-262T C/T demonstrated the OR for CKD of 0.67 (95% CI 0.43–1.06) with the marginally significant trend for decreased odds ratio with increasing numbers of T allele ( p = 0.070).

The analysis of variance revealed a marginally significant difference between the scale values of valence pre and post-training sessions [ F (1, 11) = 3.99; p = 0.07; η 2 = 0.27].

We observed no main effect of expectedness status, F(1, 20) = 2.80, p = .11, η 2 = .12, no main effect of semantic category, F(1, 20) = 1.93, p = .18, η 2 = .09, and a marginally significant expectedness status by semantic category interaction, F(1, 20) = 3.70, p = .07, η 2 = .16; this interaction was characterized by longer reaction times for standard emotional words (mean = 1274, SE = 48) relative to same-list unexpected neutral words (mean = 1185 SE = 40, p<01), or relative to standard neutral words (mean = 1194, SE = 48, p<.01) and same-list unexpected emotional words (mean = 1185 SE = 47, p<.05).

Results showed that the effect of experimental manipulation remained marginally significant, F (1,75) = 3.39, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.04.

One intriguing observation ( Drane et al ., 2005 ) of a marginally significant ( p = 0.07) additional gain of 0.1−0.2 grade point for URM students is similar to our findings that suggest a slight narrowing of the grade difference between URM and non-URM students in one of the two SGM-supported courses.

inoffensive comments (Δ p – Δ q ) revealed a marginally significant difference (χ 2 (1) = 3.34, p = .07), suggesting that fusion's effect on selective censoring may have been larger for offensive than inoffensive comments.

A Kruskal-Wallis test found a marginally significant difference in mean ranks across conditions, H (3) = 6.94, p = .07.

Simple effects analyses found that in pain condition, participants experienced marginally significant more self-uncomfortableness for high facial attractive actors ( M = 3.41, SE = 0.12) compared to those for low facial attractive actors ( M = 3.34, SE = 0.12, p = 0.07); in non-pain condition, no such difference was found ( p = 0.18).

For improvement from sight-reading to day 2, technical performance in the interleaved condition was rated as better than the blocked condition by rater 1 (sign test, marginally significant: p = 0.07, see Figure 1 ).

In pediatric ALL patients, the novel Hispanic-specific ALL risk signal at ERG locus exhibited marginally significant association with ALL susceptibility in Chinese patients ( P = 0.07, OR = 1.18 [0.99-1.41]), and reached statistical significance in patients without common fusion ( P = 0.02, OR = 1.29 [1.04-1.61]), which has been validated in previous study [ 28 ].

They also had marginally significant (both p<0.07) increased odds of experiencing insomnia and Whooley-screened depression ( Table 4 ).

The occurrence of diarrhoea was highest among the goats under 1 year (18%) followed by adolescents (1–2 years; 12%) and adults (more than 2 year: 11%) and the difference was found marginally significant ( p = 0.07).