“marginally significant”

In pediatric ALL patients, the novel Hispanic-specific ALL risk signal at ERG locus exhibited marginally significant association with ALL susceptibility in Chinese patients ( P = 0.07, OR = 1.18 [0.99-1.41]), and reached statistical significance in patients without common fusion ( P = 0.02, OR = 1.29 [1.04-1.61]), which has been validated in previous study [ 28 ].

Intriguingly, total WBC count had no difference between the young and aged groups, but there were marginally significant alterations in WBC differentials: the percentage of total lymphocytes (35.94 ± 7.48 vs 33.98 ± 8.63, P = 0.07) declined with age (Table 1 ), while the proportion of total monocytes (7.40 ± 1.64 vs 7.87 ± 1.90, P = 0.056) was elevated (Fig. 1 A), consistent with the previously depicted age-associated shift towards the myeloid lineage differentiation.

Bivariate analyses between Latinx and non-Latinx adolescents (Table 2b ) revealed marginally significant differences between Latinx (17.9%, n = 30) vs. non-Latinx adolescents (25.6%, n = 57) for lifetime self-cutting behavior at baseline/t1; χ 2 [1, 391] = 3.29, p < 0.070, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.04.

Indeed, the effect of femininity remains marginally significant (estimate = 0.82, 95% CI = [0.66–1.02], p = 0.070) when the rate of spatial association was included as a covariate in the model based on aggressions ( Table S9 ).

The results demonstrated that 20 Hz stimulation induced marginally significant facilitatory effects on semantic processing ( N = 4, 3 females, mean age = 23 ± 3.5yrs, Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = −1.5, p = 0.07) (Fig.

Crucially, this analysis revealed that, overall, the stress group showed marginally greater learning of probability-based information than the control group (as indicated by the marginally significant GROUP × PROBABILITY interaction, F (1, 51) = 3.45, p = .07, η 2 p = .06; stress group: M random high = 96.34%, M random low = 101.61%, standardized learning score: M = 5.27%; control group: M random high = 97.04%, M random low = 100.89%, standardized learning score: M = 3.85%, see Fig 4 ; for a figure with individual data points, see S5 Fig in S1 File ).

Health status was not a significant predictor for vitamin D supplementation anymore, while the financial status was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

This result holds true for three quality of life domains: the physical (estimate = .085, p = .02), the social (estimate = .191, p = .009), and the psychological domain (estimate = .075, p = .026); the effect was marginally significant for the environmental domain (estimate = .077, p = .07).

This difference was marginally significant (p = 0.07).

As predicted, majority decision-making yielded a marginally significant positive relationship to team performance for teams with high task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = 1.85, p = 0.07; see slope 1 in Figure 4 ) and a significant negative relationship to team performance for teams with low shared task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = −4.56, p < 001; see slope 3 in Figure 4 ).

NF‐C showed a marginally significant increase from 0 to 6 months ( P = .07) while changes from 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months were not significant.

Maternal education (OR: 1.56 (95% CI: 0.98–2.46); p = 0.057), was marginally significant and was included in the multivariate analysis; additionally low birth weight showed marginal significance (OR: 2.90 (95% CI: 1.12–7.44); p = 0.07), however the large number of missing values for birth weight (19.2% missing) and paternal age (10.9% missing) reduced the potential value as predictive factors and were therefore not included in the multivariate analysis.

The regression analysis showed a significant main effect for spatial ability [β = −0.507, se(HC4) = 0.181, p = 0.007], no main effect of condition [β = 0.703, se(HC4) = 0.399, p = 0.10], and a marginally significant interaction effect between spatial ability and condition [β = 0.224, se(HC4) = 0.123, p = 0.07].

Results for the t-shirt revealed a marginally significant main effect of authorship ( β = 0.457, t = 1.95, p = 0.07), a significant two-way interaction between authorship and loneliness ( β = 0.045, t = 2.46, p < 0.05), and a significant three-way interaction between authorship, loneliness, and product background lighting ( β = −0.066, t = 2.07 , p < 0.05).

The results of the response time ANOVA (i.e., mean release times for correctly executed go trials) indicated a main effect of distance [ F (1,20) = 7.12, p = 0.01, partial eta-squared = 0.26, observed power (alpha 0.05) = 0.72] and a marginally significant session x distance interaction [ F (1,20) = 3.47, p = 0.07, partial eta-squared = 0.15, observed power (alpha 0.05) = 0.43].

This difference remained marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

But whereas the contrast was marginally significant when not adjusted for phylogeny ( F 1,44 = 3.53, p =0 .07), too few independent taxonomic clusters were present for this to be robust to phylogenetic correction (pMCMC = 0.44).

Goldenberg-Bivens [ 48 ] denoted a marginally significant difference in dysregulated expression of sadness among girls, in comparison to boys ( t (225) = 1.81, p = 0.07).

After antibiotic treatment and prior to the fecal transplant procedure, both FB-W and FB-K mice had a significant (p = 0.037) and a marginally significant (p = 0.07) reduction in microbial species diversity, respectively, when compared to that of the treatment naïve WT mice based on Shannon anlaysis but not Chao1 analysis(Fig. 6 B and Additional file 1 : Figure S3).

Of the 27 terms in the six models, 24 (89%) were significant (P < 0.05 in 22 cases) or marginally significant (P < 0.07 in 2 cases) ( Table 1 ).

While we failed to find a significant interaction effect [ F (3,102) = 2.28, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.01], we did find a marginally significant effect of control type [ F (1,34) = 3.44, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05] (see Figure 3 for a plot of the data associated with this analysis, as well as Table 2 for each cell of the repeated measures ANOVA).

The interactions between experiments and measure types were significant when comparing Experiment 1 with Experiment 2 ( B = −0.60, SE = 0.33, p = 0.07, R 2 = 0.10; marginally significant), and comparing Experiment 2 with Experiment 3 ( B = 0.69, SE = 0.33, p = 0.04, R 2 = 0.10).

In multivariate analysis, gravidity and IPTp remained significant ( p = 0.039 and p = 0.05, respectively), but the association of sHLA-G with placental malaria became marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

The exception is the temporariness subscale, which only showed a marginally significant association with the EPDS for men ( p =0.07).

A GLM analysis showed that there was a marginally significant effect of religiosity, F (1, 188) = 3.38, p = .07, upon attitudes towards cousin marriages, whereas the other significant effects remained as strong, with the exception of the interaction between ethnic group and life history strategy, that became marginally significant, F (2, 188) = 2.65, p = .07.