“marginally significant”

The full-null comparison was marginally significant ( χ 2 = 6.9, d.f. = 3, N = 24, p = 0.075).

The prognostic effect of PMRT on DFS or OS was not significant, although it was marginally significant on LRC ( p = 0.075).

Similarly, there was a marginally significant correlation between change in chest expansion on unequal trials and self-attributed emotion in response to the unequal outcome, r = 0.13, p = 0.075, which was of a similar magnitude after controlling for age in a partial correlation, r = 0.12, p = 0.09.

Across the entire study period, deer reduced seedbank abundance by 14%, relative to the exclosure plots, but this effect was marginally significant (F 1, 29 = 3.4, P = 0.075).

The marginally significant increase in platelet distribution width (PDW%, p = 0.075, d = 0.53, medium effect; see Table 3 ) may reflect increased platelet turnover due to bone marrow stimulation by training, with newly produced platelets being larger and more active [ 50 , 51 ].

In our study we found an inpatient mortality risk increase of about 16%, although this result was marginally significant ( p = 0.075) after adjustment for age, sex and admission triage codes.

Additionally, only T category was marginally significant in predicting LRRFS (p=0.075). 3.

However, lymph vascular invasion was marginally significant in both groups ( P = .075).

Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between Caucasians and Hispanics in fear of COVID-19 ( p < 0.05), as well as a marginally significant difference between Caucasians and African Americans ( p = 0.075).

Only disease status at the time of COVID-19 was marginally significant for adverse outcome ( P = .075), adjusted by sex (male vs female; P = .0092; Table 2 ).

It revealed a significant culture effect, F (1, 92) = 11.50, p <.001, η p 2 = .11, which was modulated by a marginally significant culture by target level interaction, F (1, 92) = 3.24, p = .075, η p 2 = .03.

Factors that statistically significant with an anxiety disorder: fear of stigma or social discrimination (AOR = 3.01, 95%CI: 1.67, 5.42), history of haven’t been tested before for HIV (AOR = 3.97, 95%CI: 2.32, 6.81), and fear of having a positive result (AOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.55, 4.36); the burden of family size was marginally significant at 0.05 level of significance (P = 0.075).

The results showed a marginally significant interaction between time and group [ F (1,64) = 3.286, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.050]; this result supported the second hypothesis that students from the experimental group improved more on creativity than those from the control group ( Table 2 ).

One-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of programming ability on accuracy [ F (1, 32) = 3.867, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.260].

time window, a repeated measure ANOVA revealed a main effect of Laterality [ F (2, 32) = 11.23, p <.001], a marginally significant effect of the variable Intended-interpretation [ F (1, 16) = 3.61, p = .075] and a significant interaction between Intended-interpretation and Anterior-Posterior [ F (2, 32) = 5.84, p <.01].

4 , Supplemental Table S2 , p < 0.000001), while MUFAs had a marginally significant increase in the warm temperature treatment ( p = 0.075).

In contrast to the acidic groups, however, the interactions of temperature and time (F = 3.712; p = 0.010) and temperature and intensity (F = 3.175; p = 0.020) were statistically significant, while the interaction of time and intensity was marginally significant (F = 2.256; p = 0.075) and the triple interaction did not reach significance (F = 1.078; p = 0.392).

The equivalence test showed that the equivalence between the online repetition and laboratory conditions was marginally significant, t (31.40) = 1.48, p = 0.075.

Compared to the octogenarians, the centenarians had lower mean values for all carotenoids and α -tocopherol, which was significantly different ( P < 0.05) for all analytes except cis zeaxanthin and marginally significant for trans lutein ( P < 0.075) and β -carotene ( P < 0.084).

We also observed a marginally significant increase in stock‐outs of any method in the past three months of 6.1 percentage points (95% CI [−0.6, 12.8], p < 0.075).

There was a marginally significant main effect of question type, F (1, 69) = 3.26, P = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.05, a significant main effect of affect, F (2, 69) = 3.33, P = 0.042, η p 2 = 0.09, and a significant interaction between both factors, F (2, 69) = 3.74, P = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.10.

A detailed within-group analysis revealed that the HC group showed a marginally significant enhancement of N100 activation for chirp compared to click conditions, localized in the TTG ( t = 3.512, p = 0.075; BA 41).

In Scenario 3, median D95% for both CTVn-intpect and PTVb-12 Gy showed marginally significant improvements (p-value = 0.075).

A marginally significant effect for group also emerged ( F (2,81.24) = 2.67, p = 0.075).

Spatial gradient of suppression The analysis on the spatial gradient of suppression showed a main effect of distractor salience ( F (1,23)=49.936, p <.001, ηp 2 =.685) and distance ( F (4,92)=18.647, p <.001, ηp 2 =.448) as well as a marginally significant interaction ( F (4,92)=2.198, p =.075, ηp 2 =.087).