“marginally significant”

Site‐level variation was marginally significant for NWLS (Estimate = 1.37, p = 0.077), suggesting slightly higher detection rates at this site.

oxystoma also tended to increase with geographical distance, although the correlations were marginally significant ( C. imicola , p = 0.077; C. peregrinus , p = 0.053; C. oxystoma , p = 0.092) ( Figure 4 b,c,e).

Specifically, a linear mixed-effects model showed a marginally significant effect of psilocybin on PSEs (mean = 0.045, SE = 0.025, t 59 = 1.80, p = 0.077).

For rearranged pairs, the stability of the latent score was marginally significant ( p = .077).

Although oxygen saturation at ICU admission was marginally significant (85.0 (±11.28) and 89.0 (±10.47) for MRG and NMRG respectively, p = 0.077).

The simple-effects test showed that the P3a amplitude under high-calorie food in the NPSS-F group was much larger than that under low-calorie food ( p = 0.043), and the P3a amplitude in the control group under low-calorie food was larger (marginally significant) than that in the NPSS-F group ( p = 0.077) and the obese group ( p = 0.058).

ROI Analyses The two (distance: far, near) × two (category: green, blue) repeated-measure ANOVA of the percent signal change for each ROI showed a significant effect of distance in the left V4 [ F (1, 16) = 6.71, p = 0.020, partial η 2 0.296] and marginally significant in the right V4 [ F (1, 16) = 3.58, p = 0.077, partial η 2 = 0.183], as the near colors produced larger responses than the far colors ( Figure 3C ).

The contribution of the absent predictor was significant for lag 3 ( p = .037), marginally significant for lag 2 (p = .077), and not significant for the other lags.

Plate distance to joint line demonstrated a marginally significant positive association with a Good-to-Excellent Mayo score (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [0.97–1.77], p = 0.077).

However, a marginally significant mean difference of 0.79 ± 1.72 mm was found for changes in the buccal aspect of the alveolar crest ( p = 0.077).

A significant positive relationship was observed between left IFG–STG connectivity and TOWRE ( β = 0.337, SE = 0.128, p = 0.011), a marginally significant relationship with spelling ( β = 0.238, SE = 0.132, p = 0.077), but not with reading fluency ( p = 0.907), Fig. 9 D.

CD44s was seen as marginally significant risk factor of recurrence of disease (p=0.077) ( Table 4 ).

The difference induced by the fertiliser treatment was marginally significant ( p = 0.077).

Regarding heart rate, a marginally significant main effect of altitude was found, F (2, 74) = 2.65, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.07.

The results of the sensitivity analysis remained marginally significant for suicide attempts (OR = 0.481, Beta = −0.730, CI: [0.203–1.051], p = 0.077) but not for suicidal ideation (OR = 0.655, Beta = −0.422, CI: [0.315–1.352], p = 0.251).

A marginally significant difference in the density of CD4 + T cells was observed across the LymphGen subtypes ( P = .077), with the MCD subtype showing lower CD4 + cell counts per square millimeter and with the EZB subtype exhibiting higher counts ( supplemental Figure 15 A).

In the FST, a significant interaction effect [ F (1, 30) = 7.366, p < 0.05] and marginally significant effect of stress [ F (1, 30) = 3.337, p = 0.077] and virus [ F (1, 30) = 2.743, p = 0.108] were observed; Post-hoc analysis revealed that CSDS mice injected with Asct2-shRNA showed significant decrease in immobility compared to the SCR-shRNA-injected CSDS group (CSDS-shSCR vs.

A third cluster located in the left VS showed marginally significant reduced activation in PDP as compared to PD patients [peak MNI coordinates x, y, z = −16, 16, −2; peak z = 3.03; peak p = 0.077 (small volume corrected); voxels = 44].

Univariate ANCOVAs indicated a significant effect for scenario 1, F (1, 95) = 9.11, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.088, and scenario 3, F (1, 95) = 5.04, p = 0.027, η p 2 = 0.050, and a marginally significant effect for scenario 2, F (1, 95) = 3.20, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.033.

The main effect of group was marginally significant ( F (1, 274) = 3.16, p = .077, η 2 p = 0.011), indicating a trend toward reduced accuracy in the MDD group.

Further correlation analysis across the whole sample revealed that the change (post-session minus pre-session) of NoGo-ACC was significantly negatively correlated with the change of PSQI ( r = -0.33, p = 0.033) and marginally significant negatively correlated with PSQI-SL ( r = -0.28, p = 0.077), while showing no significant correlation with ISI ( r = -0.21, p = 0.188) or PSQI-DF ( r = -0.22, p = 0.163).

A marginally significant relationship was observed with intensity collapsed happiness ( r (97) = −0.179, p = 0.077, CI = [−0.363, 0.019]) but this comparison did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. 2.2.3.

Changes in δ 13 C values during drought Provenance and drought significantly influenced δ 13 C values, soil quality had a marginally significant effect ( p = .077), and interactions were nonsignificant (Fig. 1 , Table 3 ).

There was a marginally significant format x cruise interaction on likelihood to visit a Caribbean resort, F 1,307 = 3.15, p = .077.

While most other physical health conditions, including digestive complaints, diabetes, chronic headaches, and sleep difficulties did not significantly predict body satisfaction, skin rash presented a marginally significant positive association ( p = 0.077).