Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Again, survival was reduced for parasitoids from mummies glued to the stem (Figure 4C ) and this was significant in the pairwise comparison with leaf top ( p = 0.031) and marginally significant in the comparison with leaf axil ( p = 0.077; see Table 2 ). 4 Discussion We find that most aphids infected by the parasitoid wasp Aphelinus chaonia get mummified either off the plant or within the plant's leaf axil.
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Initial analysis revealed a marginally significant correlation between mother and child OT levels ( r = 0.26, p = 0.077), suggesting potential coordination in baseline neuroendocrine states within dyads.
Empathy aligns brains in synchrony.
iScience · 2025 · PMC12159917
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
ROI Analyses The two (distance: far, near) × two (category: green, blue) repeated-measure ANOVA of the percent signal change for each ROI showed a significant effect of distance in the left V4 [ F (1, 16) = 6.71, p = 0.020, partial η 2 0.296] and marginally significant in the right V4 [ F (1, 16) = 3.58, p = 0.077, partial η 2 = 0.183], as the near colors produced larger responses than the far colors ( Figure 3C ).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Further correlation analysis across the whole sample revealed that the change (post-session minus pre-session) of NoGo-ACC was significantly negatively correlated with the change of PSQI ( r = -0.33, p = 0.033) and marginally significant negatively correlated with PSQI-SL ( r = -0.28, p = 0.077), while showing no significant correlation with ISI ( r = -0.21, p = 0.188) or PSQI-DF ( r = -0.22, p = 0.163).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
A repeated measures ANOVA on RTs showed a significant load effect [ F (1,17) = 97.64, MS e = 3791.33, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.85], a significant reward effect [ F (2,34) = 13.13, MS e = 639.96, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.44], and a marginally significant interaction between them [ F (2,32) = 2.77, MS e = 662.64, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.14].
marginally significantP = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Friedman’s test showed statistically significant changes over 0, 20 and 60 dpt in creatinine levels ( P = 0.026, K = 0.502), AST ( P = 0.012, K = 0.485), ALP ( P < 0.001, K = 0.641), and marginally significant changes in uremia ( P = 0.077, K = 0.420) and ALT ( P = 0.082, K = 0.421).
marginally significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
A multivariate analysis of variance was performed, with marital status as the between-subject variable and intention as the within-subject variable; The multivariate analysis of variance yielded a marginally significant main effect [F (2,122) = 2.62, p = 0.077, ɳ 2 = 0.04].
marginally significantP = 0.0771.5× alphagold
In effect, we found a significant difference between the P−A− condition ( M = 355, SD = 65) and the P−A+ ( M = 338, SD = 57, P = 0.009) and the P + A− ( M = 334, SD = 67, P = 0.036) conditions as well as a marginally significant difference between the P−A− and the P + A+ condition ( M = 343, SD = 69.99, P = 0.077).