Connections to the sensorimotor cortex were marginally significant ( p = 0.08) with greater connectivity again in the low compared to the high mindfulness groups.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Cortisol awakening response was marginally significant for yoga (p=0.08).
A paired t -test comparing the average power of the precentral gyrus ROI between PD OFF and PD ON showed a marginally significant difference with decreased power in PD ON compared to PD OFF [ t (23) = 1.81, p = 0.08, Figure A2 ].
This sex difference was marginally significant, p = .08, d = 0.66.
Activity in the aVS was not significant during positive violation trials relative to confirmatory trials [ t (16) = 0.86, p = 0.20], but exhibited marginally significant increases during negative violation trials compared to confirmatory trials [ t (16) = 1.49, p = 0.08].
We found that the free-ratio model fit the data better although this was marginally significant (p = 0.08).
A permutation-based logistic regression model controlled for time was fit, and only one variable remained marginally significant, breast-feeding ( P = 0.08) ( Table 2 ; see also Fig.
All treatments resulted in slightly higher net N mineralization rates, the increase after N addition was marginally significant (p = 0.08, Fig. 2c ).
The mean number of barriers reported was significantly ( P < 0.05) higher for women compared to men in the 60–69 year age groups and marginally significant in the 70–79 and 80 years and over groups ( P = 0.08).
Finally, in a recently published study based on NHANES data, Meeker and Ferguson (2011) found a marginally significant ( p = 0.08) inverse relation between urine BPA concentration and total T 4 among 1,367 adults ≥ 20 years of age (–5.4% per ln unit; 95% CI: 0.01, –11.3) but not among 329 adolescents 12–19 years of age.
Within the lowest-BDI group, the mood groups differed marginally significant at the baseline mood rating (SMs M = 7.1, SD = 1.2, HMs M = 6.1, SD = 1.7), t (24) = 1.81, P = .08.
This reduction was significantly modulated by rs2180619 genotype regarding the threat cue (cue FPS: F 1,138 =4.79, P =0.03, η 2 =0.03) and marginally significant for the threat context (context FPS: F 1,138 =3.1, P =0.08, η 2 =0.02).
The marginally significant interaction between body part and emotion F (2, 68) = 2.62, p = 0.080 however, suggests that the main effect of emotion is driven by the facial expression.
The ART group experienced a reduction in weekly income from a mean of 33,775 Ush at baseline to 29,481 Ush at month 6, which was marginally significant ( P = .08), but then increased to an average weekly income of 38,516 Ush at month 12; this change from month 6 to 12 was also marginally significant ( P = .08), but the income level at month 12 was now back to an equivalent level as that at baseline ( P = .81).
In a reduced model where only promotion success, rs4680 genotype, and the interaction were entered, the overall model fit was marginally significant: F (3, 55) = 2.39, p < .08, R 2 = 0.12.
The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of the condition contrast, β = .19, p = .080, qualified by a significant interaction with PNS, β = –.28, p = .036.
This trend was marginally significant (ANOVA p = 0.08) in the 0–2 cm depth interval (Figure 1 ; n = 6 N-fertilized vs. n = 6 unfertilized samples, However, gene copy number normalized per gdw was not significantly different among treatments in the 0–2 cm depth interval (data not shown).
Negative affectivity A marginally significant main effect of time (intercept) reflected a tendency for trait NA scores to decrease from baseline to post-treatment across groups (pooled t (144) = 1.76, p = .08, partial η 2 = 0.02).
For RT scores, there was a significant main effect of rumination on NA ( β = .25, SE = .04, p <.01), and the interaction between rumination and the RT scores of the emotional n -back was marginally significant ( β = −.07, SE = .04, p = .08).
time to relapse) were marginally significant, as it can be seen in Figure 2 ( E & G ) (p = 0.08, CI = 90% and p = 0.05, CI = 95% respectively).
The addition of NPA reduced direct transport through the outer compartment (i.e., 3 H-IAA supply to and recovery from the outer compartment; Figure 6 ) at a level that was marginally significant (p-value = 0.08; one-tailed paired t-test comparing IAA and IAA + NPA movement through the outer compartment).
Early Time Window (150–350 ms post-onset) In the analysis of the main set of electrodes, there was a marginally significant interaction of Violation×Anteriority (F(2,30) = 3.1; p = .08).
While the main effect of in-state tuition for undocumented students does not significantly predict college enrollment in either model, its interaction is marginally significant (p = .08), potentially suggesting that state tuition policies have a stronger relationship with college enrollment for undocumented than for documented youth.
Follow-up analyses for each time-bin indicated that the Group effect was significant for the first and second time-bin ( F (2,28) = 15.6, 6.9, p s < .01), marginally significant for the third time-bin ( F (2,28) = 2.8, p = .08), and non-significant for the last two time-bins ( p s > .1).
There was a marginally significant main effect of the preceding trial type [ F (1, 17) = 3.45, p = .08, η 2 = .03], a significant main effect of the FA type [ F (1, 17) = 15.00, p = .001, η 2 = .10], and a significant interaction between two factors [ F (1, 17) = 24.359, p < .001, η 2 = .20].