Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp < .081.6× alphagold
Exceptions included (see Supplemental Table): depression, panic disorder, and phobias were more likely among adolescents than children, while SUDs were more likely for adolescents; generalized anxiety disorder and eating disorders were more likely among girls than boys; and children not living with both birth parents were more likely to have probable diagnoses of depression, ADHD, and CD (a similar pattern was marginally significant, p < .08, for separation anxiety disorder, phobias, and ODD). 3.2.
marginally significantp = .081.6× alphagold
While the main effect of in-state tuition for undocumented students does not significantly predict college enrollment in either model, its interaction is marginally significant (p = .08), potentially suggesting that state tuition policies have a stronger relationship with college enrollment for undocumented than for documented youth.
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.
marginally significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
We found marginally significant differences (both at P = 0.08) for two dietary indices, the biomasses of five major prey groups and number of prey taxa, between nests with different numbers of fledglings ( Table 5 , Fig. 4 ).
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
For sample 1, the overall model was marginally significant ( F (2, 210) = 2.59; p = 0.08), with a negative but non-significant linear effect ( t = −1.46; ns ), and a significant accelerating quadratic effect, ( t = 2.28; p < 0.05); and for sample 2, the overall model was significant ( F (2, 160) = 5.34; p = 0.006), with a negative but non-significant linear effect ( t = −1.32; ns ), and a significant accelerating quadratic effect, ( t = 3.03; p = 0.003).
Affective Risk Associated With Menstrual Cycle Symptom Change.
Front Glob Womens Health · 2022 · PMC9353132