Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Visual Search Task Independent-samples t -test (one-tail) on RTs slope (RTs difference between 12 and 2 set-size in msec) reduction between AVG and NAVG group was marginally significant ( t (12) = 1.47, p = 0.08; mean AVG slope improvement between T1 and T2 = 80 msec SD = 143 vs. mean NAVG slope improvement between T1 and T2 = −33 msec SD = 140).
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
Moreover, besides major effects of the substrate, multifactor MANOVA revealed significant effects of intercropping (culture form) on Mn in leaves ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant effects on Ca ( p = 0.08), while in the tillers, concentrations of P and Fe exhibited significant substrate–culture interactions, indicating that the effect of culture form depends on the growth substrate.
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
For total distance, we found a marginally significant effect of group, with the control group having lower total distance than the Nogo-A knockdown group, F (1, 16) = 3.55, p = 0.08, η G 2 = 0 . 16 , and no interaction of group and phase factors, F (1, 16) < 1, p = 0.85, η G 2 = 0 . 00 .
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
In the no-tone condition, the difference in the congruity effect between the two groups was marginally significant [ F (1, 26) = 3.4, MSE = 1,725, p = 0.08], whereas in the tone condition, the difference in the congruity effect between the two groups was significant [ F (1, 26) = 7.73, MSE = 1,725, p < 0.01].
Attentional networks in developmental dyscalculia.
Behav Brain Funct · 2010 · PMC2821357
marginally significantp = .081.6× alphagold
Follow-up analyses for each time-bin indicated that the Group effect was significant for the first and second time-bin ( F (2,28) = 15.6, 6.9, p s < .01), marginally significant for the third time-bin ( F (2,28) = 2.8, p = .08), and non-significant for the last two time-bins ( p s > .1).
Tactile stimulation reduces fear in fish.
Front Behav Neurosci · 2013 · PMC3837339