“marginally significant”

When k > 3, the estimates of β k are negative and at least marginally significant (p-value ≤.081), and the estimates of β 6 , β 7 , and β 10 are significant (p-value ≤.042).

Additionally, a marginally significant association was reported between e-cigarette use frequency and having had bronchitis in the past year ( P = 0.081).

Gender differences were marginally significant in TAFS-M and TAFS-L in the same direction (t=-1.76, df=91, p=0.081, Cohen’s d=0.41; t=-1.75, df=91, p=0.084, Cohen’s d=0.41).

For the final turning peak velocity ( Figure 3 F), the elderly group showed marginally significant differences with respect to the senior adults ( p = 0.081), but their peak velocity was significantly lower than in young adults ( p = 0.015) and in children ( p = 0.015).

Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction of compatibility and transition, F (1, 21) = 3.36, p = 0.081, η p 2 = 0.14, was found.

The first data set has a positive correlation at a marginally significant level ( n = 262, slope = 8.683, P = 0.081; Fig. 1F and Table 2 ) between the empirical minimal doubling times and the spacer numbers.

In Experiment 1 , for the clearly visible condition, two-tailed dependent t -tests revealed a marginally significant semantic facilitation in the μ parameter, t (17) = -1.86, p = .081.

While the subperiod-average percentage of the population >65 years only appeared as a marginally significant predictor (likelihood ratio test, p = 0.081) in the second-stage meta-regression (Supplementary Table 3 ), it is still conceivable that our estimates of the climate-change attributable death burden in Germany are biased by ignoring age-group-specific temperature-mortality associations.

Post-hoc comparison of individual group means showedasignificant ( p = 0.009) difference in dopamine between Aldh1a1 −/− ×Aldh2 −/− mice and wild-type controls at middle age, and a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.081) in the oldest group.

Only CAMS-R was found to be significantly correlated with valence rating of negative pictures ( r (20) = .634, p = .007) and also marginally significant in correlating with valence ratings of positive pictures ( r (20) = −.459, p = .081).

Participants who were overweight showed a tendency toward irregular monitoring compared with those with normal weight, although this was marginally significant (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.92–4.60, p = 0.081).

The change score analysis reveals a marginally significant positive correlation between vaccination rate and the change in excess mortality from the first to the second pandemic year ( r = 0.45 , p = 0.081 ).

12 IU oxytocin) and olfactory condition (F 1, 70 = 5.65, p=0.020, partial η 2 = 0.075), on top of a strong main effect of olfactory condition (F 1, 70 = 20.63, p<0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.23) and a marginally significant interaction between social proficiency and oxytocin treatment (F 1, 70 = 3.13, p=0.081).

Survival analysis ( figure 3F ) showed an improvement in survival for mice in the CXCL10-Nrf2-FTH-MSC group (median survival time: 21 days) compared to the PBS group (median survival time: 15 days), with a marginally significant difference (p=0.081).

Despite these differences in sensory acceptance, purchase intention scores for the control and EOB samples showed only a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.081), with respective responses as follows: texture (24 vs. 39), flavor (37 vs. 35), acidity (22 vs. 17), and overall impression (17 vs. 9).

For rs1861868 polymorphism, marginally significant associations were obtained with weight ( p = 0.081) and BMI ( p = 0.096) after adjustment for age and gender.

Success A binomial mixed-effects regression model with random slopes by round for each dyad and random slopes and intercepts by round for each target word indicated a marginally significant positive effect of round on success (β = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = .081).

A significant interaction was found between stimulus timing and saccade direction ( F (12, 168) = 3.43, p < .01, f = 0.46), along with a marginally significant main effect of saccade direction ( F (1, 14) = 3.46, p = .081, f = 0.46).

Analysis of simple slopes of the significant interaction showed that the link between ST values and attitudes towards cooperative methods was positive in the ST condition and the control condition (combined effect, b = 0.17, SE = 0.06, t (116) = 2.93, p = .004, 95% CI [0.06, 0.29], η 2 = 0.07), but negative and marginally significant in the SE condition ( b = −0.16, SE = 0.09, t (116) = −1.76, p = .081, 95% CI [− 0.35, 0.02], η 2 = 0.03).

Results revealed a marginally significant main effect of valence in mPFC F (2, 24) = 2.80, p = 0.081.

Additionally, we found a marginally significant ( P = 0.081) difference of TgAb (IU/ml) between the two groups (with CLNM: median 2.02, interquartile range 1.02-24.20; without CLNM: median 1.71, interquartile range 0.98-7.15).

Mediation of victim number effects While the direct effect of victim number on donation amounts was not significant, ß < .03, p = .646, we found a marginally significant direct effect of the victim number manipulation on impact judgments, ß = –.14, p = .081.

A marginally significant distractor interference ( p = 0.081) was also found in the high-load condition (HLND).

Therefore, a Kruskal–Wallis test was used instead, yielding a marginally significant result (H = 5.026, p = 0.081).

They did however find a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.081), which might be a chance finding, between walkability and talking with neighbours for the prediction of sedentary time.