“marginally significant”

This relationship was marginally significant in a Chi 2 -test (χ 2 (2) = 4.915, p = .086, n = 243).

Being offered free HPV vaccination was significant in the bivariate analysis (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.70, p=0.039) but was marginally significant in the multivariate analysis (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.06, p=0.086).

Exposure to smoke for 5 min moderately increased the germination percentage, reaching a marginally significant level ( P = 0.086; Fig. 1 b).

Partial correlations revealed a marginally significant positive association between the change in BDNF and within-session learning in the BIKE group ( r (23) = 0.40, p = 0.086), but not in the STRETCH group ( r (23) = −0.27, p = 0.253).

The results revealed marginally significant main effects of task (F(1, 20) = 3.26, p = 0.086.), with stronger connectivity found in the trade-off instruction task (mean = 0.35, std = 0.23) than in the preferential choice task (mean = 0.29, std = 0.22).

The initial analysis including all three populations of bass (Florida Everglades, Illinois Hatchery, Illinois Wild) found a marginally significant interaction between lighting environment and male color morph ( Table 5A , F 2,144 = 5.25, P = 0.086).

For 28 surgery-only EOCRC patients in GSE39582 , 3 patients were categorized as high-risk by 6-GPS with a marginally significant worse RFS compared to 25 low-risk patients (HR = 4.76, 95% CI 0.72–31.31, p = 0.086; Fig. 2 E).

With respect to latencies on target trials only: the analysis in the Aware group showed a marginally significant main effect of stimulus-type, F (1,15) = 3.367, P = 0.086, indicating that latencies to LR targets were faster (mean = 2.70, SD = 0.07) than to HR targets (mean = 2.72, SD = 0.07).

formosa than those baited with (1 R ,4a S ,7 S ,7a R )-nepetalactol only, this difference being marginally significant ( p = 0.086) (Fig. 1 ).

After excluding these subjects, the mixed-model ANOVA revealed a significant effect for block, F (2) = 93.73, p < 0.001, a marginally significant interaction between Block ⋅ Group, F (2) = 2.52, p = 0.086, and a significant groups effect, F (1) = 4.14, p = 0.047.

CrCl <45 ml/min tended to be a marginally significant adverse prognostic factor (HR 2.45, 95% CI 0.88-6.83; P=0.086).

Fish length Average fish length was not significantly different between scenarios for roach (ANOVA, p = 0.51) and eel (ANOVA, p = 0.56), but was marginally significantly different (if a p-value is between 0.05 and 0.10 it is further on referred to as marginally significant) between scenarios for bream (ANOVA, p = 0.086.) (Supplementary Fig.

However, in depth analysis of the correlations between SV and the network connections in the flourishing network yielded only one marginally significant correlation with the connection between lFusG and lAngG ( r = 0.26, p = 0.086).

The LSD pairwise multiple comparison test reveals marginally significant differences between the NP 1 and the NP 2 conditions as well as the NP 2 and the NP 3 conditions, both p = 0.086, as outlined in Table 6 .

Examining the interaction on water taste at step 3 revealed a marginally significant effect, β = –.46, t (196) = –1.72, p = .086.

The interaction between expressive suppression and ICSW was marginally significant ( b = .09, p = .086), and an analysis of simple slopes further revealed no significant effects for this interaction (all p > .10).

Furthermore, a higher TCs density of FGL1 + showed a marginally significant correlation with worse DFS compared with those with a low density (p=0.086; online supplemental figure S11B ).

When both cognitive reflection and scientific literacy, which were strongly correlated ( r = 0.41, P < 0.001), were included in the same regression analysis, the interaction effect of scientific literacy was substantially reduced and nonsignificant ( B = −0.72, SE = 0.72, CI = [−2.19, 0.73], P = 0.326) whereas the interaction effect of cognitive reflection was modestly reduced and marginally significant ( B = −0.83, SE = 0.48, CI = [−1.77, 0.12], P = 0.086).

After gender effect was controlled, we found a marginally significant partial correlation ( r (150) = .140, p = .086) between PSTR and IJS difference, implying that the effect was weaker than previously thought.

Furthermore, LDL particle size had marginally significant negative associations with hemoglobin ( r =-0.118, p =0.086), white blood cell count ( r =-0.122, p =0.077), hemoglobin A1C ( r =-0.115, p =0.095), and fasting glucose level ( r =-0.122, p =0.075).

Fish length as a covariate had a marginally significant positive effect (Wald = 2.95, df = 1, p = 0.086).

Regardless of treatment, alder log-transformed seedling biomass was negatively correlated with the relative abundance of pathogens, (F (89, 2) = 5.639, P < 0.020) and showed a marginally significant positive relationship to the relative abundance of the DSE functional group (F (89, 2) = 3.025, P < 0.086).

Results indicated a marginally significant difference between coefficients under moderate fatigue (40 min) and baseline states ( p =.086), with no significant differences among other pairwise comparisons Table 8 .

This reinclusion of inconsistent cases hardly changed the results for metric outcomes with significant effects for knowledge and attitudes and slightly changed results for smoking behaviour with marginally significant associations for lifetime smoking (p=0.086) and incidence (p=0.083).

There was a marginally significant difference in the probability of initiating CH or CL-AG first (χ 2 = 2.951, df = 1, P = 0.086); almost two-thirds of plants initiated CH first (63.4 % vs. 36.6 % CL-AG first; Table 2 ).