Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp=0.0861.7× alphagold
This reinclusion of inconsistent cases hardly changed the results for metric outcomes with significant effects for knowledge and attitudes and slightly changed results for smoking behaviour with marginally significant associations for lifetime smoking (p=0.086) and incidence (p=0.083).
marginally significantp = 0.0861.7× alphagold
At the maximal belief change, however, correlations between the neural response amplitude in the late time window (i.e., the CPP response) and behavior is significant in Experiment nSP ( R 2 = 0.2, p = 0.036) and is marginally significant in Experiment nTP ( R 2 = 0.12, p = 0.086).
Neural Encoding of Auditory Statistics.
J Neurosci · 2021 · PMC8336711
marginally significantP = 0.0861.7× alphagold
Metabolic syndrome was negatively associated with 25(OH)D (OR 0.921, 95% CI 0.888, 0.954). Regarding β ZY , one unit increase in VD_GRS, VD_GRS metabolism , and VD_GRS synthesis was not significantly associated with metabolic syndrome traits (continuous variables), except that GRS combined and GRS synthesis showed marginally significant association with FPG ( P = 0.086 and 0.061, respectively) (Table 2 ).
marginally significantp = .0861.7× alphagold
Three‐Month Father–Child Interactions and Cognitive Development There was evidence of a marginally significant association between paternal sensitivity and cognitive development, β = 0.16, p = .086, which was largely unchanged when adjusting for covariates—infants of sensitive fathers had higher MDI scores (seeTable 2 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0861.7× alphagold
When both cognitive reflection and scientific literacy, which were strongly correlated ( r = 0.41, P < 0.001), were included in the same regression analysis, the interaction effect of scientific literacy was substantially reduced and nonsignificant ( B = −0.72, SE = 0.72, CI = [−2.19, 0.73], P = 0.326) whereas the interaction effect of cognitive reflection was modestly reduced and marginally significant ( B = −0.83, SE = 0.48, CI = [−1.77, 0.12], P = 0.086).