“marginally significant”

However, entering the SVO after the PVQ-RR led to a marginally significant increase in explained variance of almost 1% (adjusted R 2 = 0.24, p = 0.088).

Main Effects Analyses The two-way MANCOVA shows a marginally significant total direct effect of ad type on taste perceptions ( F (1, 136) = 2.96, p = 0.088), with the single-sense ad slogan ( M = 7.15, SD = 1.60) leading to more positive taste perceptions than the multiple-sense ad slogan ( M = 6.68, SD = 1.61).

It should be noted that the correlation between genetic distances based on microsatellite data and sampling age ( Figure S1, C ) was marginally significant (p = 0.088) that could contribute to the effect of isolation by distance in the genotype data.

dACC activity exhibited a marginally significant association with felony rearrest above and beyond these other risk factors (p = 0.088) (see Table S3 for further convergent support and Figure S2 for visualization of effect). 3.2.2 Does the Inclusion of Neurobiological Error Monitoring Information Increase the Accuracy of Statistical Models in Predicting Non-Violent Rearrest in Women?

This emotional word type effect was marginally significant during negative word processing, F (1, 29) = 3.109, p = 0.088.

Patients with abnormal ENG had lower neural density; however, in our study cohort, this was marginally significant ( p = 0.0880).

For LTI, phosphate levels were significantly correlated ( r = 0.145, p = 0.019), and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were marginally significant ( r = 0.145, p = 0.088 for iPTH and r = 0.142, p = 0.096 for hs-CRP). 3.3.

For all of the subjects (n = 63), significant interaction between gender and temporal pole GMV at Time 2 (b = 2.76, p = 0.0052) and marginally significant interaction between gender and hippocampal GMV at Time 2 (b = 2.18, p = 0.088) were observed for longitudinal perfusion declines in the temporoparietal region.

Additionally, there were significant relationships between frequency of TM home practice and improvements in emotional exhaustion ( p = 0.005), anxiety ( p = 0.008), and insomnia ( p < 0.001), and a marginally significant relationship with depression ( p = 0.088).

Differences in the use of reversible methods were driven by significantly higher use of condoms (ITT, RR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23, p=0.024) and a marginally significant increase in the use of oral contraceptive pills (ITT, RR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.69, p=0.088).

The interaction effect was marginally significant, F (1, 35) = 3.08, p = 0.088.

The interaction term between stimulation code and stimulus site was marginally significant (p = 0.088), thus the simple effects were probed to avoid a Type II error ( Figure 3 ), but Bonferroni adjustments were applied to reduce the probability of Type I Error.

The valence ratings also showed significant positive correlations with the suprahyoid EMG activity ( t = 3.49, p < 0.001, d = 0.65) and marginally significant correlations with the masseter ( t = 1.39, p = 0.088, d = 0.26).

Fathers’ authoritarian behaviors were more common in children with abdominal pain (marginally significant, P = 0.088).

This did not yield a significant Electrode Site × Time × Treatment interaction, F (1, 44) = 0.35, p = .555, η 2 = .00. CRN Analyses of the CRN magnitudes did not yield any main or interaction effects at either FCz or Fz, all p s > .10, apart from a marginally significant main effect of time at Fz, F (1, 44) = 3.04, p = .088, η 2 = .06, due to a decreased CRN at this site at the end of treatment, M i-j = – 0.32, SE = 0.18, p = .088, 95% CI [– 0.69, 0.05]. ∆ ERN The results from analyses of ∆ERN magnitude mirrored those of ERN magnitude.

The main effect of time was marginally significant, F(1,688) = 2.91, p = .088, η p 2 < .001 meaning that participants showed marginally less explicit ingroup bias after the election (M = 1.13, SD = 26.29) compared to before the election (M = 3.90, SD = 25.78).

A marginally significant correlation between pairwise F ST and geographic distance (r = 0.45, p = 0.088; Supplementary Table 4 ; Supplementary Figure 3 ) suggested weak isolation-by-distance. 3.2.

There were also marginally significant positive associations between Hb and age ( p = 0.088) and female sex ( p = 0.081).

The direct effect of HTD explanation on purchase intention is marginally significant ( p = .088; B = .221).

The hypothesized effect of the structural paradox on distrust as compared to the low power-low status condition became marginally significant ( p = 0.088).

The comparison between the pureed diet and the soft diet without food textures that pose a risk showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.088).

Applied to all 31 subjects the correlation was marginally significant ( r = −0.31, p = 0.088).

Rodents with 15% tannin had a marginally significant shorter survival time than treatments with 1% and 5% tannin content ( P = 0.088 and 0.109, respectively).

It was found that the IFOV conditions (F = 17.33, p < 0.001) significantly influenced the BTC, while gender had a marginally significant effect on the BTC (F = 3.044, p = 0.088).

We apply bivariate probit regression to address this unobserved effect and find that the effect of MAOA remains significant for lottery purchase (allele model, p = 0.010, genotype model, p = 0.011) and marginally significant for insurance purchase (allele model, p = 0.088, genotype model, p = 0.088).