Non-intoxicated: The model examining accuracy, using the index of discriminability (d prime) on the 1-back part of the N -back task was marginally significant ( R 2 =0.038, F(7,365)=1.79, P =0.088).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Second, and most paradoxically, the exploratory analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction effect between manipulated profile source and past experience on reported attraction, F (1, 201) = 2.94, p = .088, η p 2 = .014 ( Figure 3 ).
INTENTIONAL BINDING TASK The GLM revealed a significant main effect of AGENCY, F 1,50 = 6.28, p = 0.015, and a marginally significant trend of JUDGMENT, F 1,50 = 3.032, p = 0.088.
Differences in the use of reversible methods were driven by significantly higher use of condoms (ITT, RR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23, p=0.024) and a marginally significant increase in the use of oral contraceptive pills (ITT, RR: 1.28, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.69, p=0.088).
The two groups had a marginally significant difference in age with the mindfulness group slightly older [ t (36) = −1.755, p = 0.088], and a marginally significant difference in the interval between their two visits [ t (36) = −1.764, p = 0.089] with the mindfulness group slightly longer due to the longer time interval of the four subjects from the waiting list.
We apply bivariate probit regression to address this unobserved effect and find that the effect of MAOA remains significant for lottery purchase (allele model, p = 0.010, genotype model, p = 0.011) and marginally significant for insurance purchase (allele model, p = 0.088, genotype model, p = 0.088).
This emotional word type effect was marginally significant during negative word processing, F (1, 29) = 3.109, p = 0.088.
It should be noted that the correlation between genetic distances based on microsatellite data and sampling age ( Figure S1, C ) was marginally significant (p = 0.088) that could contribute to the effect of isolation by distance in the genotype data.
A follow-up regression model predicting unique actions from education and proportion of key function play yielded a marginally significant interaction term ( p = .088), so we remain cautious in our interpretation.
The main effect of time was marginally significant, F(1,688) = 2.91, p = .088, η p 2 < .001 meaning that participants showed marginally less explicit ingroup bias after the election (M = 1.13, SD = 26.29) compared to before the election (M = 3.90, SD = 25.78).
With SPSS software and Scheffe multiple comparison tests, the differences within in these groups are statistically significant ( P =0.04) and between the acute and chronic group, there was marginally significant with approximately 91% of confidence level ( P =0.088).
The arithmetic-space association induced by subtraction was marginally significant in 300 ms delay condition, t 24 = −1.781, p = 0.088, but strong in the 500 ms delay condition, t 24 = −4.075, p < 0.000.
In COPD patients, ICS use showed a marginally significant increased risk for narrowly defined IPF (adjusted HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 0.48 to 18.61, p=0.088), but not for broadly defined IPF.
For LTI, phosphate levels were significantly correlated ( r = 0.145, p = 0.019), and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were marginally significant ( r = 0.145, p = 0.088 for iPTH and r = 0.142, p = 0.096 for hs-CRP). 3.3.
Not undergoing post-OLT CRRT was also a marginally significant predictor of removal from dialysis (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.95 to 2.14, p = 0.088; Table 3 ).
The BRCA1 deficient models (all Brca1 +/- ; p53 +/- IR and Brca1 Co / Co ;TgMMTV-Cre; p53 +/- tumors) were marginally significant with human basal-like tumors ( p = 0.088).
It was found that the IFOV conditions (F = 17.33, p < 0.001) significantly influenced the BTC, while gender had a marginally significant effect on the BTC (F = 3.044, p = 0.088).
We also observed a marginally significant speech stimulus by face context interaction F(1, 33) = 3.089, p = 0.088, η 2 = 0.086.
A marginally significant treatment by aHEI interaction was observed (F(6,186) = 1.87, p = 0.088, Table 3 ).
The interaction term between stimulation code and stimulus site was marginally significant (p = 0.088), thus the simple effects were probed to avoid a Type II error ( Figure 3 ), but Bonferroni adjustments were applied to reduce the probability of Type I Error.
The main effect of evaluation type was marginally significant, F (1, 44) = 3.05, p = 0.088, η p 2 = 0.65.
Memory tested after 24 h There was a marginally significant negative correlation between the sensitivity bias and memory for associations encoded during positive (vs. negative) feedback (ρ = −0.402, p = 0.088; Figure 5B ).
Here, we found a marginally significant negative correlation between PR expression levels and cell-specific bacterial production (Spearman Rho = −0.71, n = 7, p -value = 0.088), supporting the view that the expression of PRs may decrease under conditions of high C bioavailability ( McCarren et al., 2010 ).
There were also marginally significant positive associations between Hb and age ( p = 0.088) and female sex ( p = 0.081).
This finding was statistically significant prior to adjusting for endogenous estrogens (52%, p = 0.031) and marginally significant after adjustment (39%, p = 0.088).