“marginally significant”

Lower socio-economic scores were correlated with lower adherence to healthy pattern among children ( P = 0.003 for boys, P = 0.091 for girls, marginally significant).

In comparison, the meta-analysis concluded a marginally significant difference in clinical success in favour of the BD group at 6 months (p = 0.091).

For positive mood state, there was a marginally significant theme × message × time linear interaction ( F (1, 10) = 3.48, p = .091, η p 2 = 0.26).

3.3 Profile of Mood States (POMS) There was a marginally significant increase in Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) over time (F(1,25) = 3.09, p = 0.091) ( Fig. 10 ), with a trend for lower scores at Time 1 (M = 87.8, SE = 3.08) as compared to Time 2 (M = 92.3, SE = 3.08) ( Fig. 7 ).

Analyzing the intercept data, the main effects of configuration and epoch were not reliable, but the two-way interaction of configuration × epoch was marginally significant [ F (6,108) = 1.881, p = 0.091, η 2 = 0.095].

1C ) and marginally significant difference in Replicon_GC% (variable p = 0.091) and in the copy number of Set_ID12 ( p = 0.080), Set_ID16 ( p = 0.091), Set_ID8 ( p = 0.079), Set_ID23 ( p = 0.072), and Set_ID27 ( p = 0.091).

There was a marginally significant interaction of ROI × Group ( F (5,23) = 1.94; P = 0.091), suggesting that differences between the two groups in the nature of word-selective processing were dependent upon the location along the posterior–anterior axis of the OTC.

This effect was marginally significant for the 2500 Hz tone ( Z = −1.69, p = 0.091).

It is important to note that negative symptoms were marginally significant ( p = 0.091), but post-hoc comparisons indicated that Biotype 3 exhibited greater symptom severity compared to Biotype 1 ( p = 0.040, Fig. 2A ).

The interaction effect between decision-maker role and tDCS group was marginally significant ( F (2, 72) = 2.48, p = 0.091, η p 2 = 0.07).

A marginally significant multiple regression equation was obtained [ F (2, 18) = 2.74, p = 0.091, R = 0.43]; the effect of communication was significant [ t = 2.12, p = 0.048, partial regression coefficient (β hereinafter) = 20.69, standardized β = 0.63], and that of attention switching was also significant ( t = −2.21, p = 0.040, β = −21.98, standardized β = −0.65).

First there was a significant main effect of human intervention whereby human players caused autonomous agents to exhibit less entropy in their distributions over agents in view, F (1,59) = 21.43, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.058; and a marginally significant main effect of movement type, F (2,59) = 2.41, p = 0.091, η p 2 = 0.014.

A significant interaction between EPIC1 expression and menopausal status was observed ( p = 0.034; Figure 4 ), which was marginally significant after adjustment (adjusted p = 0.091).

As shown in Figure 3B , two-way ANOVA (on log-transformed measurements) showed marginally significant evidence of interaction between injury and sex ( P = 0.091), so FPI effects were reported separately for males and females.

The main effect of group was marginally significant ( F (1, 48) = 3.042, p = 0.091).

The associated period of consecutive pointwise differences (going from 1350 to 1600 ms post-label onset) was determined to be marginally significant according to the cluster analysis ( cluster-t = 11.33, cluster-p = 0.091).

Third, regarding the test of the indirect effects of empathic concern, perspective taking, and personal distress on the relation between attachment avoidance and altruistic behaviors, results indicated that the mediating effect of empathic concern was significant, β = −0.229, SE = 0.074, p = 0.002, Bootstrap 95% CI = [−0.432, −0.026] (medium effect size) [ 58 ]; the mediating effect of perspective taking was marginally significant, β = −0.051, SE = 0.030, p = 0.091, Bootstrap 95% CI = [−0.128, 0.026] (low effect size) [ 58 ]; and the mediating effect of personal distress was not significant, β = 0.003, SE = 0.011, p = 0.761, Bootstrap 95% CI = [−0.043, 0.043].

This analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of condition for oxy-Hb [ F (1, 11) = 3.43, p = 0.091].

For BN, changes in thoughts associated with ‘ dietary restraint ’ were marginally significant, indicating a slight increase from pre- ( M = 11.15, SE = 9.32) to post-binge ( M = 14.86, SE = 13.38; W = 99.5, p = 0.091, Cohen’s d = -0.055), whereas no significant change emerged for individuals with BED (pre: M = 12.0, SE = 9.76, post: M = 11.07, SE = 9.80; W = 39.5, p = 0.354, Cohen’s d = 0.20).

However, a marginally significant association was found between the cetuximab and non-cetuximab groups ( P = 0.091).

Marginally significant difference was shown in time to occlusion and period of primary stent patency [4.5 (1.0–10.3) months vs 19.0 (8.0–37.5) months, P = .091 and 16.0 (6.0–56.0) months vs 6.5 (1.0–17.5) months, P = .076].

The price premium HR was 0.684 (p=0.024), and the market share HR was marginally significant at 0.99 (p=0.091).

Overall, the effect of group on age was marginally significant (p = 0.091, Supplementary Table S1 ), but post hoc t-tests (corrected for multiple comparisons) showed participants with anosmia were significantly older than their counterparts with normosmia ( p < 0.05, Fig. 1 .) In total more men participated (25 women, 38 men); however, there were more women (10) than men (6) with hyposmia (Fig. 1 .), with a marginally significant effect of group on gender (p = 0.097, Supplementary Table S1 ).

After adjusting for BMI and year, the group effect of Health group vs Osteoporosis group became marginally significant under both Bray–Curtis and Jaccard measures (Bray: R2=0.201, F = 2.78, P = 0.091; Jaccard: R2=0.102, F = 1.35, P = 0.061), with neither covariate significant (BMI: P = 0.950; year: P = 0.226).

However, a marginally significant association was shown between non-participation in hobby groups and the FL3 respondents, which is similar to the results from Model 1 ( p = 0.091).