“marginally significant”

1C ) and marginally significant difference in Replicon_GC% (variable p = 0.091) and in the copy number of Set_ID12 ( p = 0.080), Set_ID16 ( p = 0.091), Set_ID8 ( p = 0.079), Set_ID23 ( p = 0.072), and Set_ID27 ( p = 0.091).

We found a marginally significant European Identity × Political Tendency ( b = −0.08, p = 0.091) on the Scarce Jobs argument but not a National Identity × Political Tendency interaction ( b = 0.03, p = 0.692).

Property victimization was marginally significant ( p = 0.091), suggesting a potential influence.

Lower socio-economic scores were correlated with lower adherence to healthy pattern among children ( P = 0.003 for boys, P = 0.091 for girls, marginally significant).

Post-hoc analysis showed significant difference between pre- and post- training at 16 ( P = 0.002) and 24 ( P < 0.001) cpd, marginally significant difference at 8 cpd ( P = 0.091), but no significant difference at 0.6, 1, 2, 4 and 36 cpd ( P ≥ 0.150) with HOA correction; significant difference at 16 ( P = 0.023), 24 ( P = 0.002), 36 ( P = 0.004) cpd, marginally significant difference at 0.6 ( P = 0.055), 1 ( P = 0.050), 2 ( P = 0.098), 8 ( P = 0.077) cpd, but no significant difference at 4 cpd ( P = 0.264) without HOA correction.

The analysis revealed marginally significant differences between locations (p = 0.091) and depths (p = 0.073), suggesting potential vertical migration of MPs and regional variation in contamination levels.

The associated period of consecutive pointwise differences (going from 1350 to 1600 ms post-label onset) was determined to be marginally significant according to the cluster analysis ( cluster-t = 11.33, cluster-p = 0.091).

The main effect of Reading Time was marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 2.85, p = .091.

After adjusting for BMI and year, the group effect of Health group vs Osteoporosis group became marginally significant under both Bray–Curtis and Jaccard measures (Bray: R2=0.201, F = 2.78, P = 0.091; Jaccard: R2=0.102, F = 1.35, P = 0.061), with neither covariate significant (BMI: P = 0.950; year: P = 0.226).

Although the subsequent univariate tests indicated a small marginally significant difference among artistic careers in extrinsic motives and the intrinsic to extrinsic ratio the Bonferroni post hoc showed no differences among them (lowest p = 0.091) (for details, see Figure 8 ).

The interaction effect was marginally significant, F(5,18)=2.27, p<0.091, with freezing during the third, fourth and fifth time bins (minutes 6–15) lower in the CRF-ArchT group (Holm’s sequential Bonferroni, bin 3: p<0.046, bin 4: p<0.008, bin 5: p<0.046.

For BN, changes in thoughts associated with ‘ dietary restraint ’ were marginally significant, indicating a slight increase from pre- ( M = 11.15, SE = 9.32) to post-binge ( M = 14.86, SE = 13.38; W = 99.5, p = 0.091, Cohen’s d = -0.055), whereas no significant change emerged for individuals with BED (pre: M = 12.0, SE = 9.76, post: M = 11.07, SE = 9.80; W = 39.5, p = 0.354, Cohen’s d = 0.20).

The hand * sex interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 99) = 2.90, p = 0.091, η 2 p = 0.02, while the main effect of hand was non-significant ( p = 0.475).

The main effect of group was marginally significant ( F (1, 48) = 3.042, p = 0.091).

Overall, the effect of group on age was marginally significant (p = 0.091, Supplementary Table S1 ), but post hoc t-tests (corrected for multiple comparisons) showed participants with anosmia were significantly older than their counterparts with normosmia ( p < 0.05, Fig. 1 .) In total more men participated (25 women, 38 men); however, there were more women (10) than men (6) with hyposmia (Fig. 1 .), with a marginally significant effect of group on gender (p = 0.097, Supplementary Table S1 ).

Among them, C9 showed marginally significant associations with SGLT2 inhibition (p=0.091).

The interaction effect between decision-maker role and tDCS group was marginally significant ( F (2, 72) = 2.48, p = 0.091, η p 2 = 0.07).

This pattern was marginally significant, F (1,57) = 2.96, p = 0.091, η p 2 = 0.025, suggesting that Japanese speakers may apply the visual-based strategy to the similarity judgment better than English speakers.

As shown in table 4 , association results from multiple logistic regression were similar to those of the bivariate analysis for emotional violence, except that experience of job change in the past year at individual level was marginally significant (OR=2.05, 95% CI 0.89 to 4.72, p=0.0913) and several variables at the relationship level were no longer statistically significant, including having a husband with gambling experience, having neighbours to help with a family accident and having a husband with history of physical abuse by family members.

A marginally significant correlation with lymph node status was detected: 82.6% of the cases presenting RQ ≤ 2.00 showed less than four positive lymph nodes ( P = 0.0915).

Additionally, fit_ss_dayt_sedentary_min contributes to a log-odds increase of 0.09526 units, although this association is marginally significant ( z -score: 1.686, p = 0.0918).

For the separate lines, the difference in free asparagine concentrations between both triple null lines, 23 and 59, and wildtype was shown to be significant ( p = 0.0402 for line 23 and p = 0.0122 for line 59, t ‐test) while that for the A genome null line, 178, was marginally significant ( p = 0.0919, t ‐test).

For GSE83300 , the low-risk group had a longer OS compared to the high-risk group, with marginally significant difference (logrank P =0.09198; Figure 5D ).

Secondary outcomes Responder analysis There is a marginally significant overall intervention effect in the percent free of HDD during the last 8 weeks (F(2,113) = 2.43, p = 0.092).

Yet, slope had a marginally significant main effect on the distance traveled during the TU ( p = 0.092).