“marginally significant”

During the second bloom, PP T amounted to highest values of 11.3 ± 5.0 μmol C L -1 d -1 at t53 for high p CO 2 , and 6.0 ± 1.9 μmol C L -1 d -1 at day t57 for low p CO 2 At the peak of the second bloom, PP T appeared to be higher at high p CO 2 , though this difference was marginally significant and dependent on time ( Table 2 ; rmANOVA, Time x CO 2 treatment, P = 0.098).

The final model incorporated unemployment rates, but this did not lead to a significant improvement in overall model fit in ANOVA (F = 0.206, p = 0.654), As with the 2019 dataset, the predictive value of E2_1 diminished in Model 4, but remained marginally significant (b = −0.156, p = 0.098) ( Table 2 ).

Pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference between both movement distances for the central test stimulus, t (15) = 1.84, p = .043, and a marginally significant effect for the central standard stimulus t (15) = 1.35, p = .098 (one-tailed).

In the Moratorium group, vertical individualism is related to prosocial engagement at a marginally significant level ( b = −0.08, p = 0.098).

Exploratory correlation analyses for the placebo group : The rated effectiveness of the placebo (M = 3.58, SD = 1.81, range: 1–8) showed a marginally significant correlation with ‚relaxation quantity’ ( r = 0.27, p = 0.098).

Trends of HAIs From 2012 to 2023, the overall hospital-wide prevalence of HAIs showed no significant trend, but differences were notable: surgical wards had a significant upward trend from 3.97% (95% CI 2.65–5.68%) in 2012 to 4.82% (95% CI 3.48–6.49%) in 2023 ( β = 0.135, P = 0.003), while ICUs and non-surgical wards showed marginally significant downward trends ( β = − 2.360, P = 0.098; β = − 0.128, P = 0.071) (Fig. 1 A).

As shown in the previous analyses, the regression coefficient between appropriateness ratings and appropriateness–CPM was statistically significant ( β = 0.525, p < 0.001), and the regression coefficient between executive functions and appropriateness–CPM was marginally significant ( β = −0.045, p = 0.098).

The main effect of CRS was marginally significant, F (1, 28) = 2.93, p = .098, η p 2 = .09, because ERs of the CRS+ condition tended to be higher (5.4%) than those of the CRS− condition (4.7%).

Notably, a marginally significant negative correlation was found between HRQoL and the HEN programs’ duration (β: −0.19, 95% CI −0.40–0.03, p = 0.098), as the HRQoL score seems to decrease by 0.19 points for each year spent on HEN.

Although marginally significant, ICCs with IDH1 / 2 mutations tended to show less frequent perineural invasion ( P = 0.098).

However, postoperative NPS was considered marginally significant as a prognostic factor for OS ( p = 0.098). 3.7.

In addition, the correlation between the differences in the recall rates obtained in the obese and normal conditions and the same differences computed for discomfort ratings was marginally significant ( r = −0.24, p = 0.098), suggesting that the more the participants perceived higher discomfort for obese faces compared to normal BMI faces, the more they recalled objects touched by obese compared to normal people.

We found no significant contrastive effect of the previous stimulus (β4 = -.002, t [29] = -.10, p = .920; see Fig 9 ) but a marginally significant contrastive effect of the 2-back stimulus (β2 = -.04, t [29] = -1.17, p = .098).

In follow-up analyses there was a marginally significant effect for reward group on the drift rate in incongruent trials, t (403.85) = −1.66, p = .098, Cohen’s d = −0.16, 95% CI [−0.36–0.03].

There was a marginally significant correlation between the face memorability (hit rates of MTurk workers) and recognition accuracy of South Korean participants, ρ = 0.176, p = 0.098 (Fig. 3 A).

The correlations were medium and marginally significant for Surprised [ r (6) = .62, p = .098] and Happy emoticons [ r (6) = .63, p = .094].

After correcting for multiple comparisons, the Group x Type interaction became marginally significant (F(1,72) = 4.01, p = 0.098, η 2 = 0.00), indicating a trend for Harm – No Harm differences to be greater in the low risk group than the high risk group (t(72.75) = −1.89, FDR q = 0.62).

For Creoles, the percentage of RDT reactive persons decreased with age with a significant slope of − 0.72 * age (in years) ( R 2 = 70.34, P = 0.0003) whereas for Qom the reactivity increased with a slope of 0.25*age, though it was marginally significant ( R 2 = 45.27, P = 0.098).

For Impulse/Self-Control, touchscreen group remained not significant, F (1, 42) = 1.048, p = 0.312, η 2 = 0.024, but background TV was marginally significant, F (1, 42) = 2.863, p = 0.098, η 2 = 0.064, with more background TV in the home being associated with poorer performance. 3.3.

In Collembola, however, movement into deeper soil was restricted to the organically managed fields (marginally significant drought × farming system interaction, χ 2 = 2.7, p = 0.098).

Significant differences in BIB proportions were found between C1 and C3 ( p = 0.002), with marginally significant differences observed between C1 and C2 and between C2 and C3 ( p = 0.098 for both).

Nevertheless, a marginally significant pathway emerged ( p = 0.098; β = −0.038): social origin → social capital → work trial.

The estimated abundance of red-listed beetles in natural dead wood differed among forest types (Quade Test Statistic: 5.639, p = 0.013) and was higher in reserves than in clear-cuts (marginally significant) and mature managed forests (Quade Multiple Comparisons, p = 0.098, p = 0.004, respectively).

After FMT there was a significant increase in bacterial richness (Wilcoxon matched-pairs singed rank test, p = 0.019) and a marginally significant increase in bacterial diversity (Wilcoxon matched-pairs singed rank test, p = 0.098) in FMT responders (Supplementary Figure 4b, c ).

For umbilical cord abnormalities and gestational age, the interaction term was marginally significant (β = 0.24, P = 0.098; AIC = 1177.7), showing a 20% EOS risk increase at 25–28 weeks, which attenuated after 34 weeks ( S4A Fig ).