“marginally significant”

Variables that were marginally significant at a level of P < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were selected in the multivariate model.

For all linear mixed-effect models, we performed backwards step-wise model simplification using likelihood ratio tests to obtain the minimum adequate model containing only significant terms (whereby we retained marginally significant effects, i.e., P < 0.1).

In addition, these data show the marginally significant downregulation of miR-138-5p after LGA stimulation at 1 day of culture (two-tailed paired t -test, T 3 = 2.854, p = 0.1; Figure 6 and the table in Figure S2C ).

Relationships between the previously defined covariates and outcome variables were assessed in separate bivariate linear regression analyses, with marginally significant covariates ( P < 0.10) included in multivariable-adjusted models.

Having been apprehended as a child was also marginally significant (at a level of p<0.10) in our final multivariable model (AOR = 1.48; 95%CI 0.90–2.43), and age was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.00 (95% 0.97–1.03)).

Type III sums of squares were used in all analyses (‘car’ package) to account for unequal numbers of observations among treatment groups, and effects were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if P ≤ 0.10.

Significant ( P <0.05) and marginally significant ( P <0.10) interactions were further explored with ‘slice tests’ (i.e. linear contrasts testing one main effect at each level of the other main effect).

(2018) find that left-hand 2D:4D is statistically significantly negatively related to men’s self-employment ( p < .01), whereas for women they report a “marginally significant” negative relation ( p < .10).

Vaccination requirements had a marginally significant effect (F = 3.173, p < 0.10), indicating that vaccination policies moderately influence travel intentions during a global viral outbreak.

Also, the pooled effect of all species was positive for each species studied, although it was marginally significant (0.05 < P < .1) for C. vulgaris ( Tables 1 and 2 ).

exotic ( P = 0.016) and target region ( P = 0.072) were significant, or marginally significant ( P < 0.10), effects.

p for trend estimates were marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

All effects were reported as statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if p ≤ 0.10.

Path analysis employing the structural equations method As shown in Tables 3 and 4 , the Chi-squared tests show that the rGE correlation between carrying ADRB2 minor alleles and negative emotion cannot be ruled out (the estimates are marginally significant, p <0.1).

In TMT‐B, the Type C group (201.69 ± 87.24) showed a significant decrease compared to the Type A group (194.80 ± 98.82) ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant decrease compared to the Type B group (283.14 ± 109.07) ( p < 0.10).

With a marginally significant association, lifetime psychiatric disorder was more common among boys than girls ( p = 0.1).

Variables that had a marginally significant relationship with PNC utilisation ( p < 0.1) were considered for the final model.

Differences were considered as statistically significant with P ≤ 0.05 and as marginally significant with P ≤ 0.1.

Marginally significant differences (.05 > P < .10) were seen in the period of SCCA diagnosis in both men and women, where those diagnosed in the most recent period (2008-2012) had a lower risk of death than their counterparts diagnosed in the initial study period (2000-2007) (RER men , 0.48, 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.01; RER women , 0.68, 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.03).

Other covariates, including mean diurnal temperature range (bio2) and mean temperature of wettest quarter (bio8), showed marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.10) or insignificant ( P > 0.10) positive correlations with genetic diversity ( Table 5 ).

Only pairs with a significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) difference are shown.

There was significant variance in the intercept ( σ = 2.94, SE = 0.80, p < 0.001), and marginally significant variance in the slope factor ( σ = 0.06, SE = 0.04, p = 0.10).

Other nephrological specific variables did not show significant differences between the two groups, although we observed marginally significant more decrease in terms of Cr in curcumin group ( P < 0.1).

0.39) was marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

There were marginally significant effects, at the P =.10 level, for improvement in strong agreement for beliefs about the importance of eating fruits and vegetables, and in taking prenatal vitamins, to the health of the developing baby.