“marginally significant”

17 Those variables significantly associated with outcome and those that were marginally significant ( P <0.10) in univariate analysis were included into multivariate analysis.

Variables significantly associated with the outcome and those that were marginally significant ( p < .10) in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis.

However, only species richness ( F = 2.54, p <0.05) showed a marginally significant decrease from July to December whereas species diversity showed no change with season ( F = 2.08, p >0.10).

Regression analyses, which incorporated variables in the bivariate comparisons that were at least marginally significant at p < 0.10, were used to examine adjusted least-square means for HRQoL by level of presenteeism.

Although no significant results were found, mainly due to the small size of the sample, when we compared the distribution of individuals with craniofacial or kidney defects according to risk stratification, a marginally significant result was obtained ( p -value = 0.10), which can indicate a tendency of individuals with high-risk status to be more likely to present craniofacial defects, while individuals with less severe status are more prone to have kidney defects ( Supplementary Figure S1 ).

], excluding the interval 800–880 msec: at the highest threshold of 4.2 SD when Δt is equal or larger to 2.95 msec, and the interval 300–380 msec: at thresholds larger than 3.3 SD when Δt equal or larger than 2.95 msec, (the lower thresholds 3.3 and 3.6 SD or the smaller Δt 2.95 msec are related to marginally significant p-values (p < 0.1), higher thresholds while at larger Δt are non-significant), LLR stretched_Lognormal (min, max) = [2, 5 * 10 2 ], p(min, max) = [10 −324 , 4 * 10 −2 ], LLR truncPL_stretched (min, max) = [2, 10 3 ], (p(min, max) = [10 −324 , 5 * 10 −2 ], excluding the interval −80–0 msec with marginal significance p < 0.1 at highest threshold when Δt is the largest, and the interval 800–880 msec at highest threshold, 4.2 SD, while Δt larger than 0.98 msec ( i . e ., marginally significant at Δt 1.97 msec, and non-significance at larger Δt).

The current value of physical functioning is significantly associated with the hazard of death (p<0.001), whereas the association between the change rate and mortality is marginally significant (p<0.10).

The frequency effect was marginally significant ( p < 0.1) and we observed an effect of ordinal position ( p < 0.05).

Within bamboo stands results varied, but with a tendency for spatial aggregation, as I a values were high and significant (or marginally significant, i.e., P < 0.10; Table 2 ).

Variables that were marginally significant (p < 0.10) in the univariate analyses were selected as covariates for subsequent multivariate analyses.

Then, using any factors that were marginally significant ( p < 0.1), we built MANOVA models, using gender, amount of debt, or prior urology clerkship as the explanatory variables.

All the cross-lagged paths remained significant, except the relationship between functional dependence at T1 and depressive symptoms at T2, which was marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.10).

If there was an acceptable size of an effect, the marginally significant interaction effect could be observed at p < 0.1, ( Armitage et al., 2019 , Chang et al., 2010 , Huang et al., 2021 , Lochner et al., 2020 ) and the significance of the main effect was indicated by p < 0.05 (two-tailed).

Potential predictors are defined as variables with at least a marginally significant association (p<0.10) with the outcome.

Results of our sensitivity analysis were similar for overall and individual gatekeeper behaviors except for questioning, which became marginally significant ( p = 0.10).

However, the addition of covariates improved model performance somewhat by decreasing model AIC and resulting in a marginally significant difference in log-likelihood ( p < 0.1).

Then, to further reduce overfitting, we used bootstrapped p values to retain only the significant or marginally significant correlations (p<0·1) in the final model ( appendix p 41 ).

Data analysis was conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; Cary, NC, USA), with two-tailed significance of p < 0.05, and marginally significant 0.05 < p < 0.1.

The relation between GDP per capita and Distrust–Trust is marginally significant (β = 2.76; p < .10).

Cox proportional hazard regression modelling, in which the length of the employment period of nail technicians was considered as time at risk, with right censoring based on the occurrence of plasma biomarker levels falling beyond the normal plasma range, revealed certain marginally significant ( p ≈ 0.10) suggestions that the proportions of nail technicians with plasma levels of HDL and fGlu beyond respective normal ranges tend to rise faster over time under higher Σ( C i / N i ) values.

However, this difference no longer met the threshold for statistical significance when covariates were added to the model (the SHACs remained marginally significant; p < 0.10).

In each case, the statistically significant ( p < 0.05) associations reported in Table 3 remained significant or became marginally significant ( p < 0.1 for two models including income), and nearly all model estimates in the T1I1 group changed by < 10%.

Due to sex differences in associations of parental SEP with health outcomes related to AL [ 28 – 33 ], and because formal tests of interaction with sex were significant ( p < .05) or marginally significant ( p < .10) for four factors (maternal smoking in the final trimester ( p = .058), complications at birth ( p = .072), maternal BMI ( p = .011) and not living with parents at one year ( p = .032), all analyses were stratified by sex.

Elemental status in the kidney did not reveal any direct or indirect linkages to BCS and only a marginally significant ( p <0.1) association between elemental status and serum protein status was detected (Fig. 6 ).

RUE from InB to A7 only correlated marginally significant with the predictions of canopy A sat at A7 ( R 2 = 0.13, p < 0.1).