Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp < .102.0× alphagold
Results for full sample (males and females) Logistic regression analyses of pooled male and female adolescents ( n = 2017) suggest that there was marginally significant association between lagged high community gender-equitable attitudes and HIV testing in the last 12 months ( p < .10).
marginally significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
In a separate adjusted Andersen-Gill model in which the duration of IV antibiotics was modeled with adjustment for all fixed baseline covariates, baseline age remained significantly associated with having an exacerbation event ( p = 0.04) and marginally significant in all other models ( p < 0.10).
marginally significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
For the amplitude of the N2 component elicited by real faces (Figure 4 ), ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of matching (mismatch, match and no-imagery) [ F (2, 46) = 5.56, p < 0.01], and a marginally significant interaction effect between matching factors and anterior-posterior scalp location [ F (12, 276) = 2.50, p < 0.10, ε = 0.21].
marginally significantp ≤ .102.0× alphagold
For the exact test and the Ewens–Watterson homozygosity test, small probability values, p = Pr ( F EXP ≤ F OBS ) indicate balancing selection ( p ≤ .05 considered significant and p ≤ .10 marginally significant), while large values indicate directional or divergent selection ( p ≥ .95 considered significant and p ≥ .9 marginally significant); note that these p values are not statistical test probabilities but the placement of an observed value in a distribution of values expected under neutrality.
marginally significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
As can be seen in the figure, children showed significant shape responding for the clay, M = 0.64, t (74) = 5.16, p < 0.0001, and wood sets, M = 0.68, t (73) = 5.90, p < 0.0001, and marginally significant shape responding for the sand, M = 0.56, t (73) = 1.89, p < 0.10, and Styrofoam sets, M = 0.55, t (74) = 1.76, p < 0.10.
marginally significantP < 0.102.0× alphagold
Other relationships rarely met the P < 0.05 statistical thresholds or were marginally significant at P < 0.10 threshold, such as LDMC, major vein density, major and minor vein MST ratios ( Table 3 ). ΔAn% was significantly influenced by force-to-tear and minor vein density, while ΔEt% and Δgsw% were only correlated to force to tear ( P < 0.05 and P = 0.06, respectively).