“marginally significant”

The difference was marginally significant ( x 2 test, P = 0.042).

Both Maxent and elastic net produced similar values for congruence, with slightly higher values for elastic net when Prior bias‐predictor was used (marginally significant; p = .042). 3.3.

Interestingly, only men displayed a marginally significant linear trend ( p = 0.042), with a decrease of dislike of salty solution towards the third measurement (F(1.35,20.33) = 5.57, partial ɳ 2 = 0.27, p = 0.020; Table 4 ), which was also found to be significant in the linear mixed model ( p = 0.007; Table 6 ). 3.3.3.

While stimulus direction alone did not predict displacement ( F 3,152 = 1.12, p = 0.34), the interaction between stimulus direction and condition was marginally significant ( F 3,152 = 2.80, p = 0.042).

When stratifying by urban/rural area of residence, we see that low education was associated with higher smoking among both urban and rural males, but the effect was stronger among rural males with a marginally significant p value for test for interaction (p = 0.042).

However, there was a marginally significant interaction between leadership strength and role (F(1,92) = 4.256, p = 0.042, partial η 2 = 0.044) as the leaders of pairs with strong leadership showed higher global efficiency (Supplementary Note 6 ), especially on the midfrontal and right centrotemporal areas.

Although PWI had a marginally significant effect on cell density in the NAc (Two-way ANOVA: F(1, 36) = 4.448, p = 0.042 for the PWI effect), post-hoc analysis revealed no significant differences between GH and PWI groups in females ( p = 0.059) or males ( p = 0.726) (Fig. 1 I and K).

In both instances, the deeper probes detected higher levels of the gas, and there was an overall marginally significant positive relationship of N 2 O with height ( F = 4.59 on 1 and 25 df; p = 0.042; coefficient 0.070, SE 0.040).

Notably, the exclusion of Gami (2013) [ 14 ] resulted in a marginally significant pooled OR ( p = 0.042), while all other exclusions yielded non-significant results (p-values ranging from 0.049 to 0.249).

The best-fitting model predicting the Bayley-III Cognitive Index included theta modulation index at 6 months , absolute theta power at 6 months, and age at outcome as predictors (F(3, 55) = 2.92), and was marginally significant (p = 0.042), explaining 13.7 % of the variance in the dependent variable (R 2 = 0.137, adjusted R 2 = 0.090).

After adjusting for major social movements, ITS analysis showed a small but marginally significant decline in the population incidence in the pre-pandemic period (risk ratio, RR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.99–1.00, p = 0.042).

Genotypes and their influence on B-NHL risk For the IL6 (rs1800796) SNPs we observed a marginally significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control group (p = 0.042, not corrected for multiple testing).

1 This study achieved the first proof of concept of epigenetic cancer risk diagnosis in any type of cancer but, due to the short follow-up period, a relatively small number of events were observed, resulting in a marginally significant difference (p=0.042).

Regarding lactate, a marginally significant negative association could be seen ( p = 0.042, 95% CI: −1.618–−0.293).

While the value of +0.548 is marginally significant (p = 0.042), its evidence is far too weak to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation, given that the correlations for the other groups are both of opposite polarity (negative), and overall there is no significant correlation.

At a more local scale, the IBD pattern was marginally significant in only one out of three sites analysed (Vauclin, P = 0.042), supporting the effect of genetic drift acting on mosquito populations.

There was also a marginally significant main effect of Face Ethnicity, F (1, 78) = 4.29, p = 0.042 η 2 p = 0.01; the European Face’s Eyes and Nose were examined for a greater percent of time (mean dwell time = 28.0%) than those of the African Face (mean dwell time = 25.5%).

We found marginally significant associations of the BPRS-24 item 4 with the traits of suspiciousness (Spearman = 0.178, p -value = 0.042), perseverance (Spearman = 0.179, p -value = 0.040), rigid perfectionism (Spearman = 0.179, p -value = 0.040), reduced affectivity (Spearman = 0.180, p -value = 0.038), eccentricity (Spearman = 0.171, p -value = 0.050), grandiosity (Spearman = 0.171, p -value = 0.050), impulsivity (Spearman = 0.181, p -value = 0.038), and the disinhibition domain (Spearman = 0.200, p -value = 0.020) using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

In addition, association of nuclear cataracts with the TT genotype of rs7543472 is marginally significant at p<0.042 and suggestive with the TT genotype of rs3754334 at p<0.06.

The correlation between sensitivity and conservation was marginally significant (Spearman ρ ; p = 0.042).

In terms of making the correct decision when comparing the parental stress scores for subgroups of parents, the adjustments for DIF in both cases meant that the strongly significant difference between the mean scores of parents from each of the two samples was reduced to being marginally significant ( p = .042), while the strongly significant difference between the mean scores of parents with secondary or less education and parents with tertiary education disappeared.

We observed a worse overall survival rate that was marginally significant in AML patients showing high levels of miR-181b-5p (p = 0.042; log-rank test) ( Fig. 3G ).

Specifically, maternal depression ( p = .001) and SSRIs ( p = .001) were significantly associated with cognitive scores (note, cocaine was marginally significant at p = .042).

Although Table 3 shows a marginally significant bivariate association between parental resilience and the MSPSS family subscale (B = 0.10, p = 0.042), the PROCESS mediation models use listwise deletion across all model variables including each respective outcome, resulting in smaller analytic samples ( n = 1493–1527) than the regression in Table 3 ( n = 1639–1649).

For the Barthel Index, both at discharge and follow-up, marginally significant differences were observed (U = 679.5, Z = −2.029, p = 0.042 and U = 692.5, Z = −2.001, p = 0.045, respectively).