“marginally significant”

Although the main effect of genotype is marginally significant according to one of the four analyses—performed on the 16 genotypes present across the two growth-chamber environments—this effect is non-significant ( p = 0.042) after correcting for multiple comparisons (adjusted FDR critical p ≤ 0.0125).

Although PWI had a marginally significant effect on cell density in the NAc (Two-way ANOVA: F(1, 36) = 4.448, p = 0.042 for the PWI effect), post-hoc analysis revealed no significant differences between GH and PWI groups in females ( p = 0.059) or males ( p = 0.726) (Fig. 1 I and K).

Among the 255 children suppressed at enrollment, more FCCM versus SOC children (98.0% versus 95.3%) were suppressed at 12-months, but this was not statistically significant in mITT or weighted mITT analyses, with a marginally significant difference using imputed mITT analysis (p = 0.042).

While this effect was not significant within groups ( glm for dark/light: z = 1.608, p = 0.108; and narrow/wide: z = 0.946, p = 0.344), it was marginally significant when data from both weak preference trials were pooled ( lme: z = 2.034, p = 0.042).

After adjusting for major social movements, ITS analysis showed a small but marginally significant decline in the population incidence in the pre-pandemic period (risk ratio, RR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.99–1.00, p = 0.042).

The main effect of BMI was marginally significant (F-statistic = 3.35, p = 0.0421), suggesting that BMI has a modest but noteworthy influence on CAC scores.

Additionally, the test comparing the clade containing the polar bears plus the ABC brown bear to all other taxa was marginally significant ( P = 0.0421), whereas tests including non-ABC brown bears and other bears were not significant ( P > 0.254).

Applying the same procedure to the classic biogeographical regions revealed a marginally significant correlation between the number of CSR and the proportion of described species in the respective region (Fig. 3 , R 2 = 0.59, F 1,5 = 7.34, P = 0.0423).

The difference was marginally significant (Mann–Whitney U = −1.72, P = 0.0427).

Baseline VAS values had a marginally significant ( p = 0.0429) negative effect, and baseline BPISI values did not have a significant influence ( p = 0.8458).

One-way ANOVA indicated marginally significant inhibitory effects of arborvitae oil on r (df = 2; F = 3.7325; p = .04293), but post-hoc pairwise tests with corrections for multiple comparisons showed there were no differences among pairs of the high or low concentrated doses.

We observed a marginally significant difference (p = 0.043) in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence between patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (27.5%) and those who were not (23.7%).

As given in Table 2 , although marginally significant ( P =0.043), gender was extracted as an independent determinant of the plasma AM levels, in addition to BMI and eGFR, in the study subjects.

Smoking was marginally significant ( p = 0.043).

When analyzing only the confirmed bird predation events we found a marginally significant interaction between wing type and background ( χ 2 = 6.30, df = 2, p = .043).

For CTBD, a marginally significant difference (t = −1.827, p = 0.043) between treatments at 1 month favoured the dAM-sBCL treatment, which exhibited a 13% increase from baseline.

Rarity status had a marginally significant effect on total male mating success ( Table 1A , P = 0.043) but common males had slightly higher mating success than rare males ( Figure 1A ).

The interaction between medfly genetic background and Wolbachia infection was marginally significant (F = 4.636, df = 1,21, P = 0.043) indicating a rather differential impact of the Wolbachia infection on the two different medfly genetic backgrounds (Fig. 7 a).

chinensis with all treatment generations (generations 4, 8, and 12 as fixed, categorical effects) to confirm a marginally significant effect ( p = .043).

If the Sand Island pair is excluded as an outlier (based on the extreme number of snails found in the Sand Island All Hosts plot, Table 1 ), then the baseline number of snails still does not differ between treatments, but the difference in recolonization rate between treatments becomes marginally significant (Wilcoxon, Z = 2.02, n = 5, p = 0.043).

Interspecific differences in PC2 values were marginally significant (2.4%; F = 4.236; p = 0.043), but the interaction between species and sex was strong, somewhat mirroring the results for sexual dimorphism in mandible centroid size (Table 1 ; Fig. 1 B).

However, for word 2, the main effect of CE was significant ( t = 12.325, p < 0.001) and the main effect of RC was marginally significant ( t = −2.026, p = 0.043).

The PABC case examined showed one of the highest OCT4 nuclear expressions, with marginally significant differences with the normal resting ( P = 0.043) and lactating breast ( P = 0.07) (Table 3 ; Figure 4 ).

There was also a marginally significant interaction for time by NEET status (time-by-NEET interaction p = 0.043).

at the recovery time with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.043, paired t -test).