“marginally significant”

However, a slight, marginally significant decline was noted between the immediate post-test and 3-month follow-up ( P = .0420), suggesting some decay over time.

When stratifying by urban/rural area of residence, we see that low education was associated with higher smoking among both urban and rural males, but the effect was stronger among rural males with a marginally significant p value for test for interaction (p = 0.042).

Although Table 3 shows a marginally significant bivariate association between parental resilience and the MSPSS family subscale (B = 0.10, p = 0.042), the PROCESS mediation models use listwise deletion across all model variables including each respective outcome, resulting in smaller analytic samples ( n = 1493–1527) than the regression in Table 3 ( n = 1639–1649).

However, a marginally significant effect on μ was found for no-gap stimuli when these responses were subdivided according to trial correct–incorrect outcome, F (1, 38) = 4.41; p = .042 ( Figure 4C ).

Logistic regression revealed a significant effect of country (LRT = 8.65, p = 0.013), with a higher prevalence in Tanzania than in Cameroon (p = 0.024, OR = 0.44 [0.21, 0.87]), whereas subsistence mode was marginally significant (LRT = 6.33, p = 0.042), likely due to a complete absence of ST2 in fishers ( S4 Table ).

In addition, association of nuclear cataracts with the TT genotype of rs7543472 is marginally significant at p<0.042 and suggestive with the TT genotype of rs3754334 at p<0.06.

The results were virtually the same, except for the shirt ornamentation preference subscale, where the interaction between country of origin and age group became marginally significant ( p = .042).

While the value of +0.548 is marginally significant (p = 0.042), its evidence is far too weak to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation, given that the correlations for the other groups are both of opposite polarity (negative), and overall there is no significant correlation.

We found marginally significant associations of the BPRS-24 item 4 with the traits of suspiciousness (Spearman = 0.178, p -value = 0.042), perseverance (Spearman = 0.179, p -value = 0.040), rigid perfectionism (Spearman = 0.179, p -value = 0.040), reduced affectivity (Spearman = 0.180, p -value = 0.038), eccentricity (Spearman = 0.171, p -value = 0.050), grandiosity (Spearman = 0.171, p -value = 0.050), impulsivity (Spearman = 0.181, p -value = 0.038), and the disinhibition domain (Spearman = 0.200, p -value = 0.020) using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

The pattern was very similar to our finding on K score: the real rTMS group showed significant or marginally significant increase in amplitudes of CDAs for the conditions with distractors (2T2D condition: t = −2.792, p = .042 for 300–900 ms, t = −2.007, p = .059 for 1300–1900 ms; 2T2Dretrocue condition: t = −2.051, p = .059 for 300–900 ms, t = −2.525, p = .042 for 1300–1900 ms), but not for the conditions without distractors (all p s > .05).

There was also a marginally significant main effect of Face Ethnicity, F (1, 78) = 4.29, p = 0.042 η 2 p = 0.01; the European Face’s Eyes and Nose were examined for a greater percent of time (mean dwell time = 28.0%) than those of the African Face (mean dwell time = 25.5%).

Our Mantel tests showed a marginally significant result ( r = 0.074; p = 0.042), indicating Hyacinth macaws follow an IBD model (Figure S5 ). 4.

While this effect was not significant within groups ( glm for dark/light: z = 1.608, p = 0.108; and narrow/wide: z = 0.946, p = 0.344), it was marginally significant when data from both weak preference trials were pooled ( lme: z = 2.034, p = 0.042).

Similarly, the sensitivity analysis of the factors affecting resistance rates also confirmed that there was no significant temporal changes for all Acinetobacter isolates and when considering ACB isolates only (the temporal trend was marginally significant for ACB with P = 0.042; Additional file 1 : Table S1), and that the North East region had higher rates on average than other regions (resistance rates in the sensitivity analyses ranging from 1.0 to 11.1 and 0 to 24.0% for ACB isolates).

1 This study achieved the first proof of concept of epigenetic cancer risk diagnosis in any type of cancer but, due to the short follow-up period, a relatively small number of events were observed, resulting in a marginally significant difference (p=0.042).

An analysis by cancer site found at most a marginally significant association between X mosaicism and lung cancer risk (OR=1.89, 95% CI=1.02–3.50, P value=0.042; 26 lung cancer cases with mosaicism).

At a more local scale, the IBD pattern was marginally significant in only one out of three sites analysed (Vauclin, P = 0.042), supporting the effect of genetic drift acting on mosquito populations.

Specifically, maternal depression ( p = .001) and SSRIs ( p = .001) were significantly associated with cognitive scores (note, cocaine was marginally significant at p = .042).

The slope of the psychometric function (Model 1b, see Methods), did show a main effect of test moment (F 1,80 = 30.09, p < 0.0001), and stimulus type (F 2,80 = 44.79, p < 0.0001), and a marginally significant interaction effect (F 2,80 = 3.31, p = 0.042).

While stimulus direction alone did not predict displacement ( F 3,152 = 1.12, p = 0.34), the interaction between stimulus direction and condition was marginally significant ( F 3,152 = 2.80, p = 0.042).

However, only two of these associations were marginally significant: in high grade (pG3) tumors (OR, 0.54; 95% c.i., 0.29–1.00; p = 0.042), and in PR negative tumors (OR, 0.58; 95% c.i., 0.33–1.01; p < 0.05; Figure 2 ). 2.5.

Treatment adherence showed a marginally significant association with asthma control ( p = 0.042) ( Figure 2 ).

In terms of making the correct decision when comparing the parental stress scores for subgroups of parents, the adjustments for DIF in both cases meant that the strongly significant difference between the mean scores of parents from each of the two samples was reduced to being marginally significant ( p = .042), while the strongly significant difference between the mean scores of parents with secondary or less education and parents with tertiary education disappeared.

Genotypes and their influence on B-NHL risk For the IL6 (rs1800796) SNPs we observed a marginally significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control group (p = 0.042, not corrected for multiple testing).

Among the 255 children suppressed at enrollment, more FCCM versus SOC children (98.0% versus 95.3%) were suppressed at 12-months, but this was not statistically significant in mITT or weighted mITT analyses, with a marginally significant difference using imputed mITT analysis (p = 0.042).