“marginally significant”

Unless otherwise noted, statistical analyses were performed using the program SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), and differences were deemed significant when P < 0.05, and marginally significant when P < 0.10.

Furthermore, marginally significant associations (p < 0.10) were found between residential density and safety from crime and AT to and from school.

For a post-hoc analysis, significant variables (p < 0.05) and marginally significant variables (p < 0.10) were tested using Tukey’s multiple comparison test at the p < 0.10 threshold.

Mediation by improved food security was marginally significant in women for both immediate recall (0.018 and 2.8%; P < 0.10) and delayed recall (0.021 and 2.3%; P < 0.10) ( 34 ).

In the next step, a multidimensional predictive model was developed based on these 6 variables, which demonstrated either a significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) association with transfusion occurrence in the univariate analysis.

Second, the accuracy scores appeared to be slightly better for reference number 16 than for reference number 32, as indicated by the marginally significant Wilcoxon Tests in the math group, z = −1.33, p = .1 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .84, SD = .05; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .83, SD = .06), and in the control group, z = −1.76, p = .07 (Reference Number 16 Mdn = .83, SD = .06; Reference Number 32 Mdn = .84, SD = .05).

Variables that were marginally significant with P<0.10 in univariate analysis were selected for multivariable analysis.

We selected marginally significant variables for each model ( P < 0.1) using backwards step-wise regression using the R package vegan ( Zelenı, 2011 ; Oksanen et al., 2015 ).

Significant ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant ( p < 0.1) predictors are summarized in Table 5 .

They observed linear inverse associations between AD and vegetable fat ( p = 0.002), and, after further adjustment for other types of fat, marginally significant associations with intake of omega-6 polyunsaturated fat ( p = 0.10 for trend) and monounsaturated fat ( p = 0.10 for trend).

In contrast, a marginally significant interaction between type and ambiguity was observed in medial parietal cortex, F 1,14 = 3.03, P < 0.10, d = 0.47, such that the region responded more during unambiguous than ambiguous inferences about beliefs but more during ambiguous than unambiguous inferences about preferences; however, neither the main effect of ambiguity ( P > 0.45) nor the main effect of content ( P > 0.76) approached significance in this region.

Significant ( p < .05) and marginally significant ( p < .10) interactions were probed by testing the conditional effects of the predictor at three levels of the moderator (mean and ± 1 SD ).

Comparing plant species, we found a marginally significant plant species effect with Dogbane showing longer SRL compared Ironweed (Figure S2 ; F 3,4.56 = 3.935, p = .1). 3.3 Mycorrhizal growth response Overall, plants grew significantly larger with AMF than in the sterile treatment, both in terms of aboveground (rank: p < .0001, F 1,175 = 312.98; permutation: p < .0001) and belowground (rank: p < .0001, F 1,178 = 201.16; permutation: p < .0001) biomass.

Path analysis employing the structural equations method As shown in Tables 3 and 4 , the Chi-squared tests show that the rGE correlation between carrying ADRB2 minor alleles and negative emotion cannot be ruled out (the estimates are marginally significant, p <0.1).

In Model (2.2): home + daily visit point buffer , park ratio showed a significant positive association with tie formation ( β = 0.127, p < 0.05), and green space ratio was marginally significant ( β = 0.180, p < 0.10).

However, it does suggest a marginally significant trend at the 10% level (p < 0.10).

Marginally significant variables, those considered clinically relevant, and all major interactions were included in the univariate analysis (p <0.10).

For younger participants, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between the number of fixations made during encoding and subsequent recognition (Pearson's r = 0.18, n = 84, p = 0.10), and a significant positive correlation between the number of transitions and subsequent recognition ( r = 0.41, n = 84, p < 0.001).

Genes were categorized into highly significant ( p < 0.001 and log 2 FC > 2), very significant ( p < 0.01 and log 2 FC > 1.5), significant up ( p < 0.05 and log 2 FC > 1.0), significant down (p < 0.05 and log 2 FC < -1.0), marginally significant ( p < 0.1 ) and not significant ( p ≥ 0.1 ).

Additional interesting results from the SEM analysis include a positive and marginally significant effect of physical abuse (CTQ_phyab) on dissociative symptoms (DES_tot, β = .19, p < 0.10), and a significant effect of sexual abuse (CTQ_sexab) on borderline symptomatology (BSL_tot, β = .17, p < 0.05). 3.2.

Additionally, the use of public transportation was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Results show that when we entered proactive personality, career adaptability and their interaction item into the regression model, proactive personality had a significant positive effect on performance ( B = 0.32, p < 0.001), whereas the effect of career adaptability on performance is marginally significant ( B = 0.122, p = 0.10).

However, the difference in estimates between White and Latinx people was marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the estimates for the other two races did not differ significantly from that of White people.

The final model was obtained by retaining those with P <0.05 and some marginally significant clinical variables with P <0.10.

3 , 19 , 22 Overall, the combined pericardiectomy rate was 65% (95% CI: 43–82%) and the between-study variability in pericardiectomy rates was marginally significant ( p = 0.10; I 2 = 56%).