“marginally significant”

In contrast, in patients without active bleeding, multivariate analysis revealed that direct clipping was associated with significantly lower rates of early and late rebleeding (both p < 0.05) and marginally significant lower rates of blood transfusion requirement and IVR need during hospitalization (both p < 0.1).

Since the effect of cultivar was significant ( p -value < 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 ≤ p -value < 0.1) on most of the constituents, further multiple means comparison was completed using the lsmeans statement of Proc Mixed (equivalent to Fisher’s least significant difference [LSD]) at 5% level of significance and letter groupings were generated.

As described previously, we confirmed the influence of seasonality on the results of the question items of “Frequently purchased goods.” The results indicate that consumer electronics, medicine, and cosmetics showed marginally significant increases or statistically significant increases ( p < 0.10 or 0.05, respectively).

Public religiousness had a marginally significant effect on recovering addicts’ after-treatment abstinence (β = 0.199, p < 0.1), with the increased odds of 22%.

Correlations between L3 vertebra and distal radius were marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Two models were marginally significant, p < 0.10.

Variables that had a marginally significant relationship with PNC utilisation ( p < 0.1) were considered for the final model.

(2018) find that left-hand 2D:4D is statistically significantly negatively related to men’s self-employment ( p < .01), whereas for women they report a “marginally significant” negative relation ( p < .10).

Other marginally significant ( p < 0.1) pairwise comparisons were also evidenced for Co-Production.

After constructing the full model containing all the predictors listed above and their interactions, we simplified the model utilizing a stepwise backwards elimination procedure based on the significance level ( p < 0.050) of the predictors, in each step dropping the predictor with the highest p value, until reaching the minimal adequate model containing only significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.100) effects.

While the association in the unadjusted model (Model 1) was marginally significant for the continuous variable (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.52; P = 0.100), it became statistically significant in Model 2 (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03–1.67; P = 0.028) and reached its strongest significance in the fully adjusted Model 3 (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.14–2.04; P = 0.005).

For younger participants, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between the number of fixations made during encoding and subsequent recognition (Pearson's r = 0.18, n = 84, p = 0.10), and a significant positive correlation between the number of transitions and subsequent recognition ( r = 0.41, n = 84, p < 0.001).

5d,g,h ), with TSSp::FRO6–GFP allele 1 significantly different ( P < 0.05) and allele 2 marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1).

In two-species conditions, it was marginally significant ( P < 0.1) for both species.

With regards to disclosure, women who fully disclosed ring use and study participation to their partners had higher PS and lower PR scores, with marginally significant differences in mean scores (at p<0.1).

Our IV OLS results in Table 8 suggest a negative, though statistically insignificant, association between retirement and alcohol consumption (β = −0.347; p < 0.01), while retirement has a marginally significant positive effect on participation in physical activity (β = 33.22; p < 0.10).

3.3 Candidate genes and adaptive loci within QTL regions 3.3.1 Cranial height: Parallel QTL in both lakes Cranial height was the only trait with statistically significant or marginally significant QTL in both lakes (Figure 4 , p < .1).

The two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of stage (F (1, 18) = 3.24, p < 0.1) and a significant marginally interaction between group and stage (F (1, 18) = 3.04, p < 0.1).

Marginally significant improvements were also observed in the subscales of self-kindness (t(132) = 1.66, p = 0.10, d = 0.14) and overidentification (t(132) = 1.88, p = 0.06, d = 0.16).

Mammoth PTM inoculation plus fertilizer was not significantly different from the fertilizer treatment for jalapeño and basil while marginally significant for tomato ( p < 0.1).

For the two-tailed t-test, a p-value of 0.0797 indicated that the difference in means was marginally significant (p<0.1).

The correlations with maternal negativity were in the expected direction —risk was uncorrelated with negativity for the 7-absent mothers and higher risk was correlated with stronger negativity for the 7-present mothers—but this was only a marginally significant effect ( p <.10).

Results were considered marginally significant for 0.05 < P ≤ 0.1.

Differences in the levels of ifnβ transcripts ( P = 0.062) and stx11 ( P = 0.056) between the double mutants were marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1).

Subjects in the highest PM 2.5 quartile for entire pregnancy had significantly higher PSS scores (p-value < 0.05), whereas those in the highest quartile for NO 2 exposure during the first trimester showed only a marginally significant association (p-value < 0.1) (Supplementary Table S3 ).