“marginally significant”

Predictors were retained when marginally significant ( p < 0.1), in case the significance changed in final, more complete models.

Although the main effect of the channel was not significant ( F [1, 26] = 0.15, p = .70, η 2 p = .01), the main effect of emotional valence was marginally significant ( F [1, 26] = 3.93, p < .10, η 2 p = .13).

Fear of COVID-19 had a significant positive correlation ( rs = 0.36-0.42, ps < 0.01) with the three subscales of the DASS (depression, anxiety, stress), and a marginally significant negative correlation with future life satisfaction ( r = -.07, p < .10).

The marginally significant ( p < .1) three‐way interaction (Population‐by‐Boundary‐by‐Survivorship interaction; F 1,111 = 3.376, p = .069; Figure S4 a) suggests that mortality was associated with lower relative growth (i.e., lower abiotic stress‐tolerance) just across the low elevation range boundary for plants from the low elevation Black Hills population.

In Model (2.2): home + daily visit point buffer , park ratio showed a significant positive association with tie formation ( β = 0.127, p < 0.05), and green space ratio was marginally significant ( β = 0.180, p < 0.10).

Four additional variables had marginally significant ( p < .10) associations with PTSD: education, unit cohesion, positive deployment experiences, and total number of career combat deployments.

However, root dry weights (Rdw) in four of the inoculation treatments were significantly lower ( P ≤ 0.01) than in the control treatment, and only the inoculation with Micromonospora ALFb5 produced an increase marginally significant ( P ≤ 0.1).

Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05 and marginally significant if 0.05 < P < 0.10.

The light grey shading on Figure 3b indicates that treatment differences in Q-TWiST were either significant ( P⩽ 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05< P <0.1) for most utility combinations, with the exception of the left-bottom corner with TOX and REL utilities both <0.2.

Three types of models were run for each age group: 1) bivariate models with potential associated factors, 2) multivariable model 1 included the variables available for the whole sample that showed at least marginally significant associations ( p < .10) and were adjusted for age and sex and 3) multivariable model 2 included the food consumption and program participation variables that had p -values <.10 in the bivariate analyses and were conducted as a sub-analysis with a smaller sample size.

The moderating effects were statistically significant if the standardized coefficients of the interaction terms were significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Among the 10 genes in PTENPATHWAY, the association of PTK2 copy numbers with cigarette smoking was highly significant; the association of MAPK1 , SOS1 , and PIK3R1 were marginally significant ( P < 0.1).

On the between-level, EE is positively related to trait EL, but not to (aggregated) state EL (only having a marginally significant relationship, p < 0.10).

In TMT‐B, the Type C group (201.69 ± 87.24) showed a significant decrease compared to the Type A group (194.80 ± 98.82) ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant decrease compared to the Type B group (283.14 ± 109.07) ( p < 0.10).

We removed the effect of age from the model if it not at least marginally significant (i.e., p > 0.1).

In MDD, we found significant correlations between AD values derived from free-water corrected data and scores from the PSWQ and PDSS (findings for the PSS were marginally significant at 0.05 < p < 0.10) such that, as scores on these stress measures increased, free-water corrected AD decreased (see Fig. 3 for scatter plots depicting these results).

We found that internet use had a significant effect on depressive symptoms (β=–.56; conditional R 2 =0.58) while only a marginally significant effect ( P <.10) was found for social relationships (β=2.91; conditional R 2 =0.58) and cultural activities (β=0.28; conditional R 2 =0.68).

These differences are statistically significant or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) for all species except D. ananassae , D. mojavensis , and D. virilis.

After normalizing the GU‐bloc weight to the corresponding body weight, the middle-aged and aged Pten adcre+ mice showed a marginally significant increased GU‐bloc/BW ratio compared to the young Pten adcre+ mice ( p < 0.10), while there was no significant difference between middle-aged and aged Pten adcre+ mice ( Figure 4B ).

The differences in seasonal net lateral flow between the EC and SC location were significant ( p < .05) in 2017, and marginally significant ( p < .1) between the EC and SBC location in 2018.

We also detected one, 4, 3, and 9 marginally significant SDR (0.05 < P < 0.10) in Castorimorpha, Ctenohystrica, the squirrel-related clade and in Myomorpha respectively.

Although the difference decreased in magnitude and significance, it remained marginally significant (−0.374, p < .10).

SNPs with marginally significant (P ≤ 0.10) interaction terms in the GENOA cohort were tested in the FHS cohort.

Simultaneously, openness to experience demonstrated a marginally significant positive relationship with job-seeking behavior (β = 0.08, p < 0.10), consistent with this personality trait’s association with exploration and novelty-seeking.

Regression analyses, which incorporated variables in the bivariate comparisons that were at least marginally significant at p < 0.10, were used to examine adjusted least-square means for HRQoL by level of presenteeism.