“marginally significant”

The difference in FEV 1 /FVC decline was marginally significant (−0.001 units/year; 95% CI, −0.003 to 2.77 × 10 −4 ; P = .101).

Treatment had a marginally significant effect on sequence similarity for M. tepaneca ( H = 128.172, p = .102), but post‐hoc Dunn's tests did not show any significant differences between treatments after Holm correction for multiple comparisons.

There was a marginally significant difference between the levels of freezing to the tone CS and that to the context [paired t -test, t (7) = 1.883, p = 0.102].

Children with lower cognitive (Chao1 P = 0.024) and language scores (Chao1 P = 0.018) had lower alpha diversity; beta diversity showed marginally significant dissimilarities (Jaccard P = 0.102 and P = 0.051, respectively).

However, this difference was marginally significant ( F (2, 41) = 2.41, p = 0.103).

When compared between females/males, singleton/twin birth, full‐term/preterm, and with/without maternal disorders, significant differences were observed between term–preterm (P/F, p = .039) and singleton–twin birth (T/S, p = .018), while marginally significant differences were observed between children with and without maternal disorder diagnosis (D/nD, p = .103, Figure 1a , middle panel), suggesting that twin status, preterm birth, and maternal disorder diagnosis can be viewed as potential risk factors for lower IQ.

The p -value also became marginally significant ( p = 0.103).

The omnibus MANOVA for oscillatory activity (across frequency-specific responses) was marginally significant [Wilks’ Lambda = 0.773, F (8,100) = 1.719, P = 0.103]; however, subsequent one-way ANOVAs for each response showed that the visual theta response differed between groups [ F (2,53) = 5.45, P = 0.007, BF 10 = 6.74; Fig. 3 ].

Moreover, we found a marginally significant interaction between CO 2 and N in total and belowground biomass of mixtures (χ 2 = 2.640, p = 0.104; χ 2 = 3.607 1 , p = 0.058) ( Table S1 ).

Moreover, we found an interaction between the image set and time point, F (1, 38) = 4.93, p = 0.032, η p 2 = 0.12, a marginally significant interaction between image set and washing condition, F (1, 38) = 2.78, p = 0.104, η p 2 = 0.07, as well as a three-way interaction, F (1, 38) = 4.21, p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.10.

However, the main effect of Task Difficulty was marginally significant, F (1, 57) = 2.718, p = 0.105.

A monolingual advantage for mixing costs in the switching task might be considered marginally significant ( p = 0.105), as might the bilingual advantage in the flanker effect ( p = 0.090).

Neutral stimuli The global signal correlation model has an accuracy of 60% with Binomial test being marginally significant ( p = 0.105) compared to null-hypothesis where no model exists.

However, PJD was a marginally significant predictor of higher perceived stress only for the revised JCQ scale ( p = 0.106 and p = 0.061 for the original and revised JCQ, respectively).

In the GBM model 3 with 5 stem cell associated gene expressions, a marginally significant improvement was seen in the prognosis model (R 2 = 11.2%, P = 0.106).

Nevertheless, additional exploratory analyses, for each experimental block separately, showed results that are similar, although not significant, to our main analysis: the main effect of phonotactics was marginally significant in both blocks for the French group (1st block: p = 0.108, 2nd block: p = 0.088), while it was not significant for the German group.

DM showed to be a marginally significant factor affecting the dependent variables, with p = 0.108 (Table 3 ).

36.6±1.9 species, p =0.023) and a marginally significant higher species richness in Fescue- than Tor Grass meadows (35.4±1.8 vs. 30.8±1.9 species [means ±1 SE ], p =0.109) (ANOVA, F [14,113,0.05] =9.53, p model <0.001).

There could be some reduction in reported waste level even in the absence of any messaging focused on food waste, but we only observed close to marginally significant week-over-week reduction among those receiving the placebo message ( Table 5 , p = 0.109).

The IVSN fIOR model showed lower performance than the IVSN model but this difference was not significant or marginally significant (Experiment 1: p = 0.11; Experiment 2: p = 0.02; Experiment 3: p = 0.07).

Additionally, associations of common femoral IMT with the 4‐m walk score were marginally significant; participants in tertiles 2 (0.68–0.82 mm) and 3 (>0.82 mm) had approximately half the odds of a perfect 4‐m walk score (Table 3 ), P =0.11, P =0.08, respectively.

PWID who lived in counties with greater percentages of unaffordable rental housing units among low-income households were less likely to report homelessness in the past year; this association was marginally significant (OR=0.97; 95% CI=0.94 to 1.01; p=0.110).

Treatment by soil depth interaction was significant (p < 0.05) at Balducchi and La Blanca, while main effects of treatment (p = 0.05) and soil depth (p < 0.05) were significant at La Hansa, and only soil depth resulted in a marginally significant effect (p = 0.11) at San Alfredo (Fig. 3 ) (Supplementary material 1 , Appendix A).

The only consistent effect observed on error rate was a marginally significant increase associated with more PCR cycles ( p =0.11 - see Fig. 5 a ).

With clone pair 4607/4608 (Figure 1 c), after 3-days of water deficit there was greater tillering of E+ plants, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.110 based on t max , p = 0.019 based on t values).