Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Although the primary trial did not yield a significant benefit for the PTSD Coach app, secondary analyses revealed a 7‐point lower PC score among PTSD Coach participants compared to those in the control group, and Black participants with high levels of PTSS at baseline reported marginally significant but robust improvements in post‐injury PTSS and significant improvement in PTSS coping self‐efficacy (Pacella‐LaBarbara et al. 2020 ).
Marginally significant lower risk of bowel resection was observed with healthy (HR=0.86, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.04) and intermediate (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.03) sleep pattern, with 22% lower risk associated with never/rarely insomnia symptoms (HR=0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94).
Correlation of PCoA Axis and Body Length The correlation test showed that body length is statistically significant, moderately correlated to PCoA1 ( R 2 : 0.5227; p ‐value: 0.005234) but not PCoA2 ( R 2 : 0.0115; p ‐value: 0.7273), while forewing length showed only a weak and marginally significant relationship with PCoA1 ( R 2 : 0.3501; p ‐value: 0.03316) and no significant association with PCoA2 ( R 2 : 0.1016; p ‐value: 0.2884). 4.
Results The results indicate that function-oriented aesthetics show a clear positive association with psychological capital, whereas responsibility-oriented aesthetics are positively related to psychological capital primarily through group identification, despite their direct effect being marginally significant.
After controlling for confounders (Table 2 , Part C), there is a marginally significant association between caregiver depressive symptoms and a positive bias ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta$$\end{document} = 0.26, 95% CI [− 0.02, 0.54], p = 0.064).
No significant association was observed between storage symptoms and WBC count in univariable analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94–1.77), though this relationship became marginally significant after adjustment for potential confounders (multivariate-adjusted OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.04–2.03).