Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Although we did not observe any significant association between the presence of CVC and either of the events in the multivariable analysis ( Table 4B ), we detected a marginally significant interaction between eGFR and the CVC status for the association with cardiovascular events ( P for interactio n = 0.058).
Effects of Mindfulness Practice with a Brain-Sensing Device on Executive Functions and Resting-State Brain Activity In our first statistical model, there was only one significant difference in pre- to posttest change in the mindfulness group relative to the control group, reflected by a marginally significant time × group interaction regarding the RT during the mixed block of the hearts and flowers test (see Table S3 ).
We have amended the result to show 3 decimal places and to state that it is only borderline significant: “For “outcome expectations”, those aged 60-75 seemed more likely to have low motivations as compared to those aged 40-59, with borderline significance (adjusted OR 1.569, 95% CI 1.004-2.453, p=0.048).” We have also removed the outcome expectations from the discussion section given the marginally significant result.
The results indicated that AUC-positive and AUC-negative showed significant or marginally significant effects on multiple aspects of mental health (see in Fig. 3 ; summarized in Table S1), including general mental well-being (AUC-positive: β = 0. 284, 95 % CI = [0.147, 0.421], p < .001; AUC-negative: β = −0.133, 95 % CI = [−0.27, 0.004], p = .057), depression proneness (AUC-positive: β = −0.131, 95
All other moderators were not statistically significant Influential analysis and publication bias The influential analysis suggested the instability of the pooled effect estimate from post-tDCS evaluation because the significant effect became marginally significant each time one of four studies was removed ( Boggio et al., 2009 ; Cespón et al., 2019 ; Cotelli et al., 2014 ; Gangemi & Fabio, 2020 ).