Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

The mediation of financial knowledge and objective numeracy on getting scammed via financial scam susceptibility was marginally significant ( p ’s in the range .04–.07, depending on the starting seed), with the effects aligning with the hypothesis that higher financial knowledge and numeracy indirectly reduce scam susceptibility, thereby decreasing the risk of being scammed.
Respondents aged 25 to 34 (OR = 0.34, P < 0.01), those aged 35 to 54 (OR = 0.39, P < 0.01), and those aged 55 and over (OR = 0.40, P = 0.01) were significantly less likely than 18 to 24 year old marijuana users to agree or strongly agree with the statement “In certain situations, I might drive high.” The age groups of 35 to 54 (OR = 0.55, P = 0.08) and 55 and over (OR = 0.51, P = 0.07) were associated with marginally significant decreases in the odds of agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement “I might drive high even though I know I shouldn’t.” Openness to driving while high was also associated with race/ethnicity.
For green tea, consumption of 120–360 mL/day was significantly associated with a decreased risk of GBC (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.97), and the association between consumption of >720 mL/day and a decreased risk of GBC was marginally significant (HR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32–1.01); additionally, there was a non‐significant trend of decreased EHBDC risk associated with increased volume of consumption ( P ‐trend = 0.160).
Similarly, we observed that the effect of Emotion on PSE varied depending on individual scores of delusional ideation (assessed with the PDI), and that splitting the sample into high and low delusional ideation (instead of high and low schizotypal traits) resulted in a marginally significant interaction between emotion and PDI group, with data visualisation also showing a pattern of larger PSE for happy-to-ambiguous faces in the high than low PDI group.
Statistical power considerations Given the uncertainty regarding the diagnostic interaction between switch probability, switch cost and RCI in the error analyses in Experiment 1 (it was marginally significant in the ANOVA, but only “anectodal” in the Bayesian test), we sought to augment the statistical power by increasing the number of participants.
Voxels reported as significant in all group-level results were those that survived an initial height threshold of p < 0.001, uncorrected at voxel level ( Z > 3.09) to isolate clusters, and p < 0.05, family wise error (FWE)-corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster level, excepting the marginally significant correlation between the right angular gyrus and STAI total score in the ASD group ( p FWE = 0.057; see “ Results ” section).