Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

? l 376: “where the response variable was” l 397: “showed that the main effects of the probability and the value of the risky options were significant (...) as well as those of the species (...) (please make a similar change also on ll 445-7 and 485-7) ll 399 & 402: Actually, p = 0.051 or 0.052 are marginally significant, please rephrase on ll 399 and 402 l 413: please erase “that” before “the trend estimates” l 447: “When investigating the effect of session on subjects’ choices” l 456: “there was no difference” (please erase “specific”) l 472: “left location” (please erase “most”) l 486: please replace “the value
No difference in weight pattern category was seen by age, education, diabetes duration and control, chronic disease (diabetes‐related variables, hypertension or CVD), depression, smoking status, fitness or self‐reported pain at baseline for either gender, although marginally significant group differences in baseline hypertension and depression, and total length of hospital stays prior to the ancillary visit were seen in men.
Timing of antibiotic administration more than 30 min before incision and longer surgery duration were also identified as relevant risk factors for SSI, with older age and higher ASA score marginally significant at the 5% level (Table 3 ).
We also did not detect significant (or trend-level) relationships between maternal sensitivity and child DRD4 genotype in the total sample or the European-ancestry sub-sample; a marginally significant difference in maternal sensitivity between the 7-allele carriers and non-carriers was seen in the African-American sub-sample only (N = 21), and thus future studies with larger sample sizes should further examine this trend.
Within the EXP-M domain, the Goals subscale exhibited a marginally significant negative effect (β=-0.04, t=-1.84), consistent with the criterion that p-values between .05 and .10 indicate marginal significance (Olsson-Collentine et al. , 2019 ), suggesting a trend whereby greater agreement on therapeutic goals was associated with slightly lower average experiential depth.