“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant quadratic time effect, suggesting that RMR peaked in early afternoon (Time: F 1,51 = 4.09, P = 0.048; Time 2 : F 1,51 = 4.03, P = 0.0499).

Further subgroup regression analysis of the NTA group showed that age ≥50 years was a marginally significant risk factor for the deterioration of renal function (hazard ratio 11.14, 95 % CI 1.02–121.65 P = 0.048).

A marginally significant difference in favor of OCR on time to disability progression (34% risk reduction, P = .048) was also observed compared with patients on a NTZ treatment pathway ( Table 3 ).

The only difference was that the associations of age with serum glucose and lipid levels became significant, whereas the positive association of extrinsic time pressure with total cholesterol became marginally significant ( p =0.048, but insignificant after applying the Bonferroni correction), and the association of noxious exposures and total cholesterol became insignificant.

Indeed, we did find a marginally significant age difference ( p = 0.048) when investigating the absolute decrease in tapping speed instead of the relative decrease.

The c-index improved by 1.11% which was marginally significant ( p = 0.048) when added to the baseline model.

When stratified by tumor type, the analysis of three cohorts focusing on hepatobiliary cancers showed a marginally significant association between viral status and SAEs (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39–1.00, P = 0.048, N = 3).

Inclusion of anti-PfSE antibody data in the pooled regression analysis resulted in a marginally significant rate of decline equivalent to a half-life of 6.4 years (95% CI = 3.22, 650.48; p = 0.048 ).

First, we found marginally significant main effects of intervention under both sufficient ( F (2, 114) = 3.12, p = .048, partial η 2 = 0.052) and insufficient ( F (2, 122) = 2.66, p = .07, partial η 2 = 0.042) pension manipulations.

By contrast, only 3.0% of patients in the ‘off label’ group compared with 18.1% in the exclusively licensed group had a history of psychosis, this difference being marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

When FSH was treated as a continuous variable, a marginally significant inverse association was observed in the unadjusted model (OR: 0.994, 95% CI: 0.989–0.999; p = 0.048), though this association was not maintained after full adjustment (fully adjusted OR: 0.995, 95% CI: 0.989–1.001; p = 0.46) (Table 2 ). 3.2 Association Between Baseline FSH Levels and Incidence of HTN and Elevated BP For elevated BP, a total of 134 elevated BP cases, who were free of outcome at baseline, were documented over 2034 person‐years of follow‐up.

The P -value for the pharmacogenetic effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.048).

Results Experiment 1 Recall performance on trivia questions A 2 × 2 ANOVA on free recall rates with the factors age (young, older) and state EC (high, low) revealed no main effect of age (F(1,52) = 1.05, p = 0.31, η 2 p = 0.02), but a significant main effect of state EC (F(1,52) = 165.18, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.76), and a marginally significant interaction of age × state EC (F(1,52) = 4.11, p = 0.048, η 2 p = 0.07).

Based on post hoc test, the increase of CYP2C6 metabolic activity was marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

The most important factors for deciding to use biosimilars by specialty were: for hematologists, comparative clinical trials (86%; p = 0.002); for rheumatologists, comparative immunogenicity data (59%; p = 0.027); and for oncologists, cost of treatment (46%; p = 0.048; marginally significant). 3.5.

Specifically, participants who were satisfied with their social support showed marginally significant better MoCA scores compared to those without applicable social support (β = 5.8, 95% CI [0.05, 12], p = 0.048).

Concerning FFM, just old rats in the ST25 group had a larger – tough marginally significant – percent increase from baseline compared with the old ST12 group (diet effect, same age, p = 0.048), and also tended to have a greater increase of FFM than adult ST25 rats (age effect, same diet, p = 0.061), see Figure 1E .

Overall, when compared by two-tailed, equal variance student t-test, there was a marginally significant difference between column extractions and HotShot ( p = 0.048) and significant difference for column and water ( p = 0.01), whilst water extractions were also significantly slower than Xtract, XT ( p = 0.02) and QuickExtract, QE ( p = 0.04).

plutonius was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression ( Figure 3 ), we observed a marginally significant decrease in the survival of larvae exposed to THI and PROP compared to infected controls ( Figure 3 d; p = 0.048, Hazard Ratio = 1.85, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.00 to 3.42; Table S1 ).

For the SI group, the model was: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:logit\left(P\right(Y=1\left)\right)=-0.46+0.10X$$\end{document} showing a marginally significant positive slope ( p =.048), while the intercept was not significant ( p =.13).

No significant differentiation was found in EORTC QLQ-BR45 domains except for a marginally significant p -value for body image ( p = 0.048). 4.

We observed a marginally significant effect in studies conducted with 1–2 whole grain products (MD = -0.144 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.287 to -0.001; I 2 = 80.60%, P = 0.048), but no significant effect was observed in studies conducted with wheat (MD = 0.019 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.130 to 0.168; I 2 = 68.27%, P = 0.80) and other whole grain types (MD = -0.164 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.434 to 0.106; I 2 = 59.92%, P = 0.23).

A marginally significant correlation was found between SBP evaluated 6 months after transplant and Cys-eGFR (ρ=0.42, p=0.048) and between SBP evaluated 12 months after transplant and Cr-eGFR (ρ=0.46, p=0.046).

There was a marginally significant interaction between group and type of anticipated reward factors in the thalamus (right: P = 0.048).

There were marginally significant differences between populations in the changes of luminance JND displayed by the interaction between population and time (LMM: F (9,228) = 1.936, p = 0.0480).