Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Clocks trained on genes involved in respiration/mitochondrial translation, oxidative phosphorylation/TCA cycle and cholesterol metabolism/mTOR signalling showed significantly increased tAge in both tissues, whereas NRF2 signalling/proteasome module clocks showed significant and marginally significant tAge acceleration in kidney and muscle, respectively.
Marginally significant effects of education (higher retention among college-educated respondents) and age (higher retention among younger respondents) are noted; Wave 2 retention ranged from 17.8% among respondents with no college education to 36.4% among those with a graduate degree, and from 30.6% in the youngest age quartile to 23.6% in the oldest quartile.
As shown in Table 4 , the mindfulness level in the training group showed a marginally significant increase starting from the first week and continued to increase significantly thereafter, while no significant changes were observed in the wait-list control group.
However, the extent of the hyperactivity of these mice models differs between studies and ranges from a mild and marginally significant increase to an almost doubling of activity in KO mice relative to control littermates (for example, compare studies by Cogram et al., 2019 and Kooy et al., 1996 ).
Mouse models of fragile X-related disorders.
Dis Model Mech · 2023 · PMC9903145
Inferential statistics were performed using paired t tests to determine significant differences, with P values interpreted as follows: P values less than 0.05 (significant), P values less than 0.01 (highly significant), P values between 0.05 and 0.10 (marginally significant), and P values of 0.10 or higher (not significant).
For significant and marginally significant treatment effects, E ‐value sensitivity analyses revealed that at the point estimate level, surgery costs and perioperative costs (before reimbursement) showed treatment effect E ‐values exceeding those of the strongest known baseline variable associations (surgery cost: 2.19 vs. 2.04; perioperative costs (before reimbursement): 2.12 vs. 1.90).
“Although the age variance was marginally significant, with a difference of approximately six months, post hoc analysis indicated a weak power of 0.33.” Should read: • “Although the age variance was marginally significant, with a difference of approximately six months, post hoc analysis indicated a weak power of 0.51.” 2. “During the 12 weeks data collection period, a response rate of 94.1% was achieved.