“marginally significant”

However, there is a marginally significant positive correlation between ease of performing and age (p = 0.048).

The P -value for the pharmacogenetic effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.048).

The main effect of genotype was marginally significant at p =0.048.

However, a marginally significant difference in cylinder at 6 months was observed ( p = 0.048).

Further subgroup regression analysis of the NTA group showed that age ≥50 years was a marginally significant risk factor for the deterioration of renal function (hazard ratio 11.14, 95 % CI 1.02–121.65 P = 0.048).

Specifically, participants who were satisfied with their social support showed marginally significant better MoCA scores compared to those without applicable social support (β = 5.8, 95% CI [0.05, 12], p = 0.048).

When the coagulation sub-score was removed from the regression model, the liver sub-score became marginally significant as a predictor of hospital mortality (p = 0.048).

There were marginally significant differences between populations in the changes of luminance JND displayed by the interaction between population and time (LMM: F (9,228) = 1.936, p = 0.0480).

However, further adjustment for health risk factors and COVID‐19 concerns attenuated the effects of frequent stress co‐occurrence on all three symptoms (Table 3 , Model 3), with the strongest effect remaining for difficulty initiating sleep (OR = 1.51, p = 0.010), followed by nonrestorative sleep (OR = 1.38, p = 0.042), while frequent nocturnal awakening became marginally significant (OR = 1.38; p = 0.048).

The band and sleep/wake state treated as within-person repeated factors explained a significant band effect ( F = 10.81, p < 0.0001) and marginally significant effect of the sleep/wake state ( F = 4.34, p = 0.048) on mean coherence.

Similar findings were observed for the relative abundance of the dominant genus Wolbachia (Wilcoxon test, all p > 0.05; Figures 5C , D ), except there was a marginally significant difference between intermediate and low levels of developed land cover (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.048; Figure 5D ).

By contrast, only 3.0% of patients in the ‘off label’ group compared with 18.1% in the exclusively licensed group had a history of psychosis, this difference being marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

Differences between CO in the supine and prone positions were found marginally significant ( P =0.048), with CO in the supine position being 0.2±0.1 L/min (95% CI, 0.0–0.4 L/min; P =0.048) higher than CO in the prone position.

Whereas inflation time had marginally significant association with the development of AKI, with OR of 1.24 per 30 min increment, 95% CI 1.01–1.58, p = 0.048 (Table 4 ).

Paying class was marginally significant (p = 0.048) with private patients having lower mean scores.

A marginally significant effect of treatment on mosquito feeding rate was observed (LRT X 2 2 = 6.0, P = 0.048, Fig. 4 A), with slightly lower feeding success with blood samples from the control group.

Survival analysis showed that level IV/V neck lymph node involvement was a marginally significant risk factor for DSS ( P = 0.048) and a significant adverse prognostic factor for DFS ( P = 0.018) ( Fig 2 ).

The only difference was that the associations of age with serum glucose and lipid levels became significant, whereas the positive association of extrinsic time pressure with total cholesterol became marginally significant ( p =0.048, but insignificant after applying the Bonferroni correction), and the association of noxious exposures and total cholesterol became insignificant.

We also found a marginally significant reduction in the LF/HF ratio in depressed individuals ( p = .048), which can be a statistical effect influenced by extreme values.

Cueing also had a marginally significant effect on FAR ( F [1, 18] = 4.488, p = 0.048, η 2 = 0.2) with more false alarms when the target appeared at uncued positions.

82.34±9.61 mmHg, respectively; p<0.001) were also significantly lower at follow-up than at the first visit, whereas systolic pressure showed a marginally significant reduction (123.5±16.57 mmHg vs. 126.83±19.97 mmHg, p=0.048).

Also a highly significant effect of time on participant’s weight (F (2, 68) = 36.32, P < 0 0.01, ηp 2 = 0.51)was shown and a marginally significant within group effect of supplementation on participant’s weight (F (2, 68) = 3.180, P = 0 0.048, ηp 2 = 0.086).

Moreover, there was a marginally significant unadjusted effect of AXIN1 rs1805105 variant in the recessive gene model ( p = 0.048, OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.25–1.01) and after adjusting for maternal age group, AXIN1 rs1805105 gene variant was significantly associated with increased odds of ASD ( p = 0.041, adjusted OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24–0.99).

In a sensitivity analysis, analysis of the change scores did find this effect to be marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

Prolific raters, in contrast, on average accurately predicted relative vaccination rates across our megastudy’s conditions ( n = 23, r = 0.60, and P = 0.003)—a marginally significant difference (Dunn and Clark’s z-test: P = 0.048; Steiger’s z-test: P = 0.051; and Meng et al.’s z-test: P = 0.055) ( 25 – 27 ).