“marginally significant”

The indirect effect (ACME) was −0.007 (95% CI: −0.009, −0.004), suggesting that grip strength still plays a marginally significant mediating role.

Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent directional effects: the weighted median method showed a similar trend (OR = 0.9713, p = 0.0997), albeit marginally significant, while the weighted mode method indicated a non-significant protective effect (OR = 0.9723, p = 0.1563).

For the quadratic effects, the square of reaction time showed clear curvature with a p value of 0.0005, whereas the square of DES dosage was marginally significant and the square of temperature was not significant.

However, BMI and sex show significant or marginally significant associations with the weighted UniFrac, which is more sensitive to abundant lineages, indicating that some abundant bacterial lineages may also be affected by these factors.

This difference was marginally significant for the Intervention Coherence domain and significant for all other domains.

In the almost whole subgroup of Asian population, a marginally significant association was explored between urinary system cancer and IL-6 −174G>C polymorphism rather than −597G>A, which also validates that chronic inflammation may be a potential risk factor in urinary system cancer.

Although incorporating ΔFAA increased the model’s predictive performance, the coefficient for this metric remained marginally significant, supporting its exploratory predictive value.

The H E level of the HAT sample was approximately 19% higher than CAT sample, with the difference being marginally significant (Tables 2 and 3 ).

Tests resulting in p-value < 0.05 are reported as significant and 0.05 < p-value < 0.10 are reported as marginally significant.

A marginally significant association was found for the mean percentage of BOP or periodontal disease status.

Imitation at T1, however, was only significantly correlated with word reading, although the correlation with SSL phonological awareness was also marginally significant.

When predicting ToM at Time 3, the additional variance explained by this second model was marginally significant, Δ R 2 = 0.02, F (1,109) = 3.30, p = 0.07. 2 This suggests that ToM performance at Time 1 has some predictive value at later time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS Given the aforementioned limitations, we have found evidence indicating a marginally significant positive association between high-fat dairy consumption and the risk of stroke.

Second, the sample size is relatively small, which may limit the statistical power to detect smaller differences in complication rates and strengthens the need for cautious interpretation of marginally significant p-values.

We found a longer incubation period for the 173 fatal cases with a mean of 3.7 days (95% credibility interval, CrI: 3.4–4.1), compared to a mean of 3.3 days (95% CrI: 2.9–3.6) for the 222 non-fatal cases, and the difference in means was marginally significant at 0.47 days (95% CrI: -0.04, 0.99).

The control group only showed marginally significant correlation results in each network ( Supplementary Figure S1 ).

The results revealed a statistically significant mean difference in the Illness Cognition dimension at T2 and T3, with a marginally significant difference at T1.

Subsequent models evaluated sensitivity of main results to inclusion of covariates identified as marginally significant in univariate tests (sex, duration).

RAVDESS task performance There was a small marginally significant effect of group on accuracy for the RAVDESS task between the active tRNS ( M = 71.60, SD = 8.09) and sham tRNS group ( M = 67.90, SD = 8.50), t (45.94) = −1.56, P = .06, d = −0.45, 95% CI [−Inf, 0.29]; see Fig. 4 .

Light intensity had a marginally significant influence on the cortisol content of the POCIS samples, with cortisol content in the POCIS sample shown to increase as light intensity increased (Fig. 1 ).

After correcting for multiple comparisons, differences in reaction norm slopes were significant or marginally significant between Sambro and all other populations except Bonavista, for which the difference was significant before the correction (Table 3 ).

However, when we tested for the origin by offspring environment interaction within each parental environment, the interaction was significant when parents were grown in 0mM NaCl ( Fig 1C ), and marginally significant when parents were grown in 100mM NaCl ( Fig 1D ).

Table 5 showed a marginally significant interaction of EC and CC when comparing current versus never smoking (95% CI: 0.20–1.07).

Consistent with the multivariable linear regression results, statistically significant or marginally significant associations consistent with the a priori assumption were observed only in the negative index models, specifically between the mixture and both the adaptive behavior subtest and composite scores (Fig. 2 A).

In all the analyses, a p ‐value less than 0.050 was assumed to be significant while a p ‐value between 0.050 and 0.100 was considered as marginally significant.