Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Supplementary Analysis As two main paths are “marginally significant” (i.e., the coefficient of the interactive term and the relationship between perceived image cost and feedback seeking behavior), we conducted the supplementary analysis without control variables to detect the effects more powerfully.
The predictive value of the CD4 cell count as a marker of non-reaching a robust/above-average response with the OCOnAbs endpoint at T3 was marginally significant, with an aOR = 1.34 (95%CI 0.96, 1.85) ( Table 2 ) The ability to predict the T5 sub-response using VE90% and OCOnAbs endpoints, according to the baseline (T1) markers, was smaller and not statistically significant for both the CD4 cell count ( Table 2 ) and the CD4/CD8 ratio ( Table 3 ).
The chi-square test was marginally significant and showed that when mixed-gain outcomes were presented close to (vs distant from) one another, a higher proportion of participants underestimated the small loss (31/106, 29.2% vs 21/113, 18.6%) and a lower proportion of participants exactly recalled or overestimated the small loss (75/106, 70.8% vs 92/113, 81.4%; χ 2 1 =3.4, P =.06).
Relationship of damage to preventive measures There were marginally significant differences in the percentage of damaged area between plots with and without all tested preventive measures considering all estimates performed (7.3% ± 12.6%, n = 87 in plots with preventive measures, and 9.3% ± 15.2%, n = 60 in plots without preventive measures; Table 3 ).
Regarding the HbF levels following transduction with GGHI and GGHI-mB-3D LVs ( Figure 3 C, right panel), both exhibited a marginally significant increase, reaching a mean of 55 ± 17% and 57 ± 20% (mean difference between GGHI and Ctrl of 4.40 ± 3.82, and GGHI-mB-3D and Ctrl of 5.93 ± 4.84, Figure S3B ), compared to 51 ± 18% in mock-transduced cells ( p = 0.062 and p = 0.052, respectively, n = 5).