“marginally significant”

However, the marginally significant interaction between weight and temperature (estimate = 0.021, p = 0.049786) suggests that while increases in weight may decrease rate of hissing, this effect is reduced as temperature increases.

Male mate choice Male reproductive history did not affect the total distance swum by males (χ2 2 = 4.141; P = 0.126) ( Figure 3 ), but it had a marginally significant effect on the total time spent inspecting females (χ2 2 = 6.001; P = 0.0498), and the proportion of time spent with the solitary female (χ2 2 = 6.017; P = 0.0494) ( Figure 4 ). “Naïve” males spent more time than “mating and ejaculation” males with females (Tukey’s test, P = 0.045), but neither diff

Furthermore, participants with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) demonstrated a tendency to have higher cognitive functioning with increased GNRI, which was marginally significant ( p -value = 0.0498).

Patients receiving laquinimod 0.3 mg/day displayed a marginally significant 44% reduction of the mean cumulative number of GdE MRI lesions compared with placebo ( P =0.0498).

Notably, the protective association between skeletal muscle-tissue instrumented BMI and eBMD remained marginally significant and attenuated slightly when adjusting for visceral adipose-tissue instrumented BMI ( β IVW = 0.14, 95%CIs = 0.00 ~ 0.28, P value = 4.98 × 10 −2 , Fig. 4 ).

There are significant differences between ITC in the two groups in the delta band (statistic = 3.4, p = 0.0007, Cohen’s d = 1) and marginally significant differences in the theta band (statistic = 1.65, p = 0.0498, Cohen’s d = 0.5) as seen in Fig. 3e .

The direct effect of psychological distress on emotion-focused coping was negative and marginally significant (β = −0.0154, p-value = 0.0498).

Saplings Variation Test Bartlett's test of homogeneity of variances resulted in a p ‐value close to 0.05, suggesting marginally significant evidence that the variances of saplings between different felling years are not homogeneous ( K ‐squared = 2.3742, p ‐value = 0.04984 [i.e., < 0.05] at a 5% significance level).

Comparing the model fit between the model containing only clinical features and the model containing all three ratios in addition to the clinical features showed a marginally significant improvement (Likelihood ratio test, p = 0.04986).

Similar results were obtained in the CIMA-CUN cohort ( n = 95 cases); however, in this case, a tendency toward significance ( p = 0.12) for RFS and a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0499) for OS were observed ( Figure S1A,B, Supplementary Materials ).

Intraoperatively, there was marginally significant use of irrigation in multi-incision (multi-incision 45 [42.9%], single-incision 31 [29.8%], p = 0.0499) and no difference in Firefly, perforation, or intraoperative cholangiogram use.

Sphingomyelin (d34:2) levels were marginally significant (OR = 1.1016, 95% CI: 1.0000–1.2135, P = .0499).

However, the interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.04996), possibly reflecting an increase in mean distance in non-native holobionts during the last timepoint (Fig. 5F , Table S3G , Fig.

The mediation analysis highlighted a marginally significant indirect effect from T1 exposure to community violence as a witness to T3 bullying perpetration through T2 CDs, β = 0.02, t = 1.96, p = 0.05, 95% C.I.

We observed a significant effect of meaning modulation [ F 1(2, 167) = 12.23, p < 0.001; F 2(2, 327) = 24.97, p < 0.001], as well as a significant effect of set type in the by item analysis and marginally significant in the by subject analysis [ F 1(2, 167) = 2.95, p = 0.05; F 2(2, 327) = 9.46, p < 0.001].

When data were averaged across the three seasons, a marginally significant Genotype × Environment interaction was observed for live (p = 0.05) and dead (p = 0.03) fine root biomass (Fig. 2g,h ).

A marginally significant inverse relationship was also noted between fasting glucose and total BAT activity (r = −0.40, p = 0.05).

Poisson GLMMs with added zero-inflation parameters displayed group and time interaction as marginally significant (χ 2 (2) = 5.97, p = 0.05), showing some difference among groups in performance-change over time.

Higher intakes of yogurt were associated with reduced risk of breast cancer (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.82) and higher intakes of American, cheddar, and cream cheeses were associated with a marginally significant increased risk (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.34; P = 0.05).

Interestingly, there was a marginally significant difference on the measure of environmental health t (76) = −2.041, p = .05.

Neutral images were more recognized by healthy participants but were marginally significant than the schizophrenia group ( t = 1.66, p = .05).

Each marker within a genetic region (including 1kb upstream and downstream regions) was evaluated for its association with the corresponding gene expression, yielding 722 genes with marginally significant cis-eQTL ( p -value < 0.05).

A 2 × 8 mixed ANOVA showed a significant main Treatment effect ( F (1,9) = 9.46; p = 0.013), Session effect ( F (7,63) = 13.21; p = 2.4e-10) and a marginally significant Treatment × Session interaction ( F (7,63) = 2.15; p = 0.05) on the proportion of perfect trials ( Figure 3(a) ), suggesting a better performance for the rats injected with L-733,060.

The time effect was significant at T2 ( β =−2.19 , t 107.5 =−3.18; P <.001) and marginally significant at T3 ( β =−1.33, t 101.0 =−1.95; P =.05).

At maintenance (6 weeks posttreatment), the dyads showed a marginally significant effect compared to controls, ß = 3.12, SE = 1.58, t (203.54) = 1.97, p = .05.