“marginally significant”

Following pre- and post-assessments of the intervention group, Item 7 of Table 8 was found to be marginally significant.

Note that when removing the non-significant interaction term from the models, the marginally significant effects of screen time on physical health and wellbeing, and on emotional maturity changed to statistical significance (physical health and wellbeing: OR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.23 - 2.04); p < 0.001; emotional maturity: OR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.12 - 1.73); p = 0.003.

We found that behavioral accuracy was slightly higher during stim trials compared with null trials, and this difference was marginally significant, but only when using a parametric statistical test [stim trial, 77.0% ± 11.6; null trial, 73.85 ± 15.9 (mean ± SD), average difference = 3.554%, t (40) = 2.134, p = 0.039, 95% CI [0.195 6.914], paired t test; Z = 1.64, p = 0.101, 95% BCa.CI [−1.839, 6.441], Wilcoxon signed-rank test].

Clusters from the third quadrant (new or falling topics) were marked as less central and less dense; that is, less advanced, gradually emerging, as well as marginally significant, with “surgery”, “biopsy”, “lymphadenectomy”, “dissection” and “gastrectomy” as major themes.

Significant changes defined by a Beta coefficient change of ≥ 10% were observed on the BSSS-4 when adjusting for positive and negative affect scores in all significant or marginally significant unadjusted models.

Controlling for the data source, this interaction became marginally significant.

Comparison of gingival microleakage revealed a marginally significant difference between the nanocomposite (Filtek Z350 XT; 3M ESPE) and the ormocer (Admira Fusion), with the nanocomposite showing marginally less leakage.

For the attentive subsample, we found a marginally significant mediation effect (std. b = .027, CI[-0.005, 0.061]) indicating that there is a tendency for individuals’ cue-thought habit to partially mediate the relationship between conscientiousness and self-control ( Fig 1 , right panel, Fig 2 bottom panel).

We consider results with p < 0.05 as significant and 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1 as marginally significant. 3.

For example, our results showed a marginally significant interaction of stress with age suggesting that this effect might change with age.

P -values of < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant, and P -values of < 0.1 were considered as marginally significant.

In the ADNI cohort, this pairwise interaction between SH3BP4 and APOE was marginally significant but did not pass Bonferroni correction.

LC-MS results of USP25 at 60 min were ambiguous and statistical evaluation provided marginally significant values.

Influential analysis showed that the exclusion of three studies [ 19 , 20 , 22 ] weakened the strength of the effect of Brazil nuts on GPx such that the result was marginally significant ( Table 4 ).

Species assignment revealed marginally significant ANI values (94% < ANI < 96%) for the cluster encompassing strains MR-7, MR-4, BC20, SA70, NCTC12093, JAB-1, ANA-3, and Shew256 ( Supplementary Table 2 , Figures 1 , and Supplementary Figure 2 , Cluster B, marked with a star [*]).

The significance level was set at α = 0.05; meanwhile, α levels between 0.05 and 0.10 are considered marginally significant.

Furthermore, intervention significantly reduced post-treatment unconstructive rumination, and there was a marginally significant trend towards an increase in post-treatment constructive rumination.

Another important observation from our study was that the malnourished cholera children reported a greater frequency of a history of cough within the last seven days, though in logistic regression analysis it was marginally significant.

Both cohorts comprised similar proportions of women and men and showed only minor—albeit marginally significant—age differences.

In addition, a marginally significant correlation was found between the difficult child subscale, which refers to parents’ perception of how easy or hard it is for them to control their children depending on their behavioral traits [ 15 ], and the Teaching dimension (r(90) = −0.20, p = 0.058).

The test for heterogeneity was marginally significant for the education level ( Figure B ).

The analyses also detected marginally significant relation between MPF Aβ burdens with WMHs in IFOF ( p ‐value .074) (Figure 2b ).

Although the P value was greater than 0.05, it was less than 0.1, indicating a marginally significant result.

SDNN increased significantly after recovery from the vigilance task and there was a marginally significant increase of RMSSD (Table 2 ).

Respondents were more likely to attend NHHM gatherings if they were younger (18–34 years) compared with respondents who were 35 or older (aPR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12–1.86), or if they had a relative or close friend experience severe COVID-19 compared with respondents with other COVID-19 experience (aPR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00–1.87), though this was marginally significant.